HawkeyeJet

Hockenson is a stud. There is not two ways about it. I'm not saying I would take him above all else, but there would be worse picks for the Jets, especially at 15. Everyone complains about lack of a true #1 receiver. Having two very good TEs creates just as much stress on a defense.

Can't wait for the article by someone who insists that all these "isolated" incidents the Patriots have don't have anything to do with their success. The Patriots are a disgusting franchise that cheats and corrupts at a deeper level than I think most people can even imagine. I have no doubt in my mind. The random things that happen to them don't just happen to orhinizations that aren't corrupt as hell.

Have to sign him now. I don't even care how he performs. These cannot go to waste.

Le'Veon Bull. Print the shirts. Print 'em

Apparently I'll be the only one to point out how comically ripped to shreds that bull is.

People joke about the "can't have too many safeties" stuff, but I legitimately believe there will soon be an NFL team whose base defense is a 4-2-5 with 3 safeties. Its becoming more prevelant in college, and as those offensive trends keep bleeding into the NFL, the defense's eventually will too. It won't happen, and I'm not saying it should, but a trio of Adams, Collins and Maye would be the type of trio to do it with.

No. They've actually been part of the NFL for quite sometime. They even won Super Bowl 3.

I didn't put "neither" as an option because I know most would answer that. I made the poll because I thought for sure, all things equal(hypothetically) more people would want the elite receiver over the elite RB. appears I was wrong. I tend to think Bell(or an elite all around RB) is becoming more valuable than an elite WR but was interested in other opinions. This was a fail on my end. I've accepted that. 😀

So maybe I should have phrased it differently. Who as an individual player would greater benefit the Jets. I posed the question as I did because I don't find it interesting to see who says "neither" because I know that's the overwhelming sentiment. I also don't find it interesting to read people postulate about the cost of draft picks. Its quite simply a question about what who would help the on field product more. I would find that more interesting of a discussion then whether anyone thinks they are a primmadonna or over the hill or too steep of price.

Exactly. Why bother? What did you respond twice for?

So far the first two responders are terrific at the hypothetical game.

The Jets are going to be tied to both players moving forward. For fun, just assume that the resources needed to obtain either will have the same exact impact on the Jets future as the other. So quite simply, if you can only have 1 or the other and all other things equal who is your choice?

Good Kickers are good until the moment they aren't. Good luck predicting when that moment is.

I like to think if I was a pro athlete, I'd try to model my attitude towards things exactly like Mr. Cutler. Average NFL QB. HOF level persona.

It's almost as puzzling at the startling amount of people who "don't care" who keep posting in a thread about it.