Ignatius del Sol
-
Posts
202 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Articles
Posts posted by Ignatius del Sol
-
-
To say I took someone else’s work and put my name on it is insulting and false.
Of course it's insulting and false. The underlying information isn't work, yours, his, or otherwise, because facts aren't proprietary, and I think the conclusion that this record is one of a 'draft genius' is sufficiently insane as to rule out the possibility that it actually came from somewhere.
-
You know what sucks? That I really don't smoke weed anymore.
But I'll bet you carry change.
-
I’ve worked hard compiling the Tannenbaum records for weeks and have done extensive research.
It took you weeks to pore over seven Wikipedia entries?
-
-
Chandler's at .330 now with the Bucks game in the books. 17 on 4 FGA will do that.
Walker's still sh*tty.
-
Mangold plays center. He's great, but he's a center. Further, Tannenbaum doesn't get genius status for selecting the highest rated center and having it pay off. Same goes for Revis...
The problem with Mangold is using the second pick of a total rebuild on a premium center. Yeah, there's one every year and they always go in that range, but Mangold is better than the other dudes and he was taken later so there's at least some sort of surplus value there. Tannenbaum gets zero credit for Revis because he didn't ****ing do anything. Revis was Mangini's pick. All Tannenbaum had to do was pay chart value to move up and then ink a slot deal. Check and...sh*t.
-
I love that we've officially reached the point
And 'we' certainly took our time reaching said point, didn't 'we?'
-
But I think he hasn't been as beastly on D or the boards this year as he was last year.
Statistically he's been almost exactly the same overall this year (.308 WP48) as he was last year (.311 WP48). Anecdotal beastliness is irrelevant.
-
Why cant Chandler play like a possessed 7 footer all the time
He does play like this all the time. I don't care how off Felton was, it just should not be possible for the Knicks to lose a game in which Chandler takes 13 shots.
-
I'm not disputing the metric matters, but I'll always be haunted by the thought of what could have been if Earl Sinclair hadn't been in charge of his development.
If you're not disputing that the metric matters, then why do you need to construct a dumb narrative implying that the success of the model in projecting Sanchez's performance has less to do with its own efficacy than with intervening acts of bad coaching? Sanchez started sixteen games for a program with an unparalleled track record for turning blue chip skill players into NFL busts and is just generally a musical-watching, hot dog-eating, belly shirt-wearing friend of Morrissey. He sucks because he was never no way no how not going to suck.
-
2
-
-
I'm not a proponent of revising history. He was a good QB prospect, even with 16 starts.
This is revising history. He was a bad QB prospect because he had 16 starts.
-
2
-
-
I can say with complete confidence that there's not a so-called "Sanchez hater" on this board who hasn't had more than a few unkind words to say about everything from every one of the LBs to Shonn Greene and everything in between, most of all Tanny for putting this mess together.
This is because everything we did was completely stupid for reasons that were entirely obvious even at the time. It really doesn't take a genius to foresee that a roster created through moves like drafting a quarterback with sixteen college starts, putting a first round grade on a big ten running back, giving a tackle-compiling linebacker a second contract, and giving away draft picks for the privilege of paying veteran talent free agent prices is headed for disaster. Even with Rex the issue of his getting passed over multiple times in Baltimore was just totally glossed over. The product the Jets are marketing is custom-built to extract maximum profits from an uncritical fan base.
-
His Korean's worse than his English.
-
Robin Williams?
-
The ilk is a conglomerate formed from the masses. Your faction tries to employ the use of fancy language and abnormal mathmatetics to try and sway people towards your side.
That's not what the language and math is for. If we want to sway the masses we have to use pictures.
-
If they didn't, the Jets may not have the one Super Bowl that they have. Unitas missed a wide open Jimmy Orr and threw an Int. Without that, The Jets and Namath may not win.
I agree. Sanchez is just like Johnny Unitas.
-
3
-
-
And I'm hardly the ringleader.
Glad we got that cleared up.
-
Why couldn't they have just lost this game outright from the very beginning just like we all expected and not waste our ****ing times?
They lost this game outright about three and a half years ago.
-
2
-
-
Jeff Triplette, ladies and gentlemen!
Triplette is an idiot but that call was a no-brainer. And again, we lost this game because we needed mediocre quarterback play to win going away and couldn't get it.
-
No-one has blamed the defense at all.
Um, scroll up.
-
LOL. Sanchez did the second worst thing he could do in that position.
And now that we've lost it's all on Hill and the defense. sh*t is Penningtological.
-
1
-
-
If our defense had any goddamn pride at all somebody would have speared the sh*t out of Sanchez on his way back to the sideline right there.
-
I still have no issue with the Jets taking him.
I wouldn't really expect the administrator of a Bills/Dolphins/Patriots salary cap site to have an issue with the Jets taking Sanchez.
-
1
-
-
They all gave him a 1st round grade.I never never argued unanimity. I'd say multiple teams, perhaps even a majority.
Anybody not see where this is going?
Content Partnership
Site Sponsor
NY Jets Podcast
Tannenbaum; Draft Genius, Salary Cap Novice
in NY Jets Forum
Posted
If you're going to be in the content business you're just going to have to grow up and put this ridiculous notion that anybody cares about your hard work right out of your mind. I'm being constructive here. The level of detail you went into on the individual transactions doesn't really bolster your argument in any way. This isn't research you had to do. It's time you wasted Googling. What you think is your process is really just a distraction. Next time just sit down, close the browser, and make your point. And knock it off with the quotation marks.