NYJetsVets91

He should just be honest and say he'd rather sit and make $10 mil than play another down for the Jets.

TRADES TRADE PARTNER: TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS SENT: ROUND: 1 PICK: 8 RECEIVED: ROUND: 1 PICK: 17 ROUND: 2 PICK: 17 ROUND: 7 PICK: 17 ROUND: 7 PICK: 23 - 17: R1P17 S ANDRE CISCO SYRACUSE 27: R1P27 CB ISRAEL MUKUAMU SOUTH CAROLINA 40: R2P8 G WYATT DAVIS OHIO STATE 49: R2P17 WR TERRACE MARSHALL LSU 72: R3P8 WR TUTU ATWELL LOUISVILLE 90: R3P26 EDGE VICTOR DIMUKEJE DUKE 110: R4P8 RB POOKA WILLIAMS KANSAS 147: R5P6 OT ROBERT HAINSEY NOTRE DAME 149: R5P8 CB KARY VINCENT JR. LSU 187: R6P8 S TODD HARRIS JR. LSU 231: R7P8 PK RILEY PATTERSON MEMPHIS 240: R7P17 WR DEZ FITZPATRICK LOUISVILLE 246: R7P23 TE NOAH GRAY DUKE 250: R7P27

Pretty damn close. Two 1s and a 3 and a starting caliber safety.

Soooo yeahhh. About that...

TRADES TRADE PARTNER: JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS SENT: ROUND: 1 PICK: 11 RECEIVED: ROUND: 1 PICK: 20 ROUND: 3 PICK: 9 ROUND: 4 PICK: 10 TRADE PARTNER: BUFFALO BILLS SENT: ROUND: 3 PICK: 9 RECEIVED: ROUND: 3 PICK: 22 ROUND: 4 PICK: 22 ROUND: 6 PICK: 28 20: R1P20 WR HENRY RUGGS III ALABAMA 48: R2P16 OT ISAIAH WILSON GEORGIA 68: R3P4 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC 79: R3P15 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON 86: R3P22 C TYLER BIADASZ WISCONSIN 116: R4P10 CB CAMERON DANTZLER MISSISSIPPI STATE 120: R4P14 TE HUNTER BRYANT WASHINGTON 128: R4P22 RB ENO BENJAMIN ARIZONA STATE 158: R5P12 EDGE ALTON ROBINSON SYRACUSE 191: R6P12 S KYLE DUGGER LENOIR-RHYNE 207: R6P28 EDGE TREVIS GIPSON TULSA 211: R6P32 CB STANFORD SAMUELS III FLORIDA STATE

This is all hypothetical and assuming the reports are true.. If it isn't then there's no point in even discussing it. Last year it was said they offered a 1st and late round pick, now they're "circling back" to make another offer before the draft. Obviously a better offer. Apparently JD wants at least a 1 and two 2s, not an astronomical difference from two 1s and a 2. Also, I don't see how it would make them look bad. The Cowboys came to them, apparently more than once. I would draw a line in the sand and stick to it. If they really want him that bad, then they're going to have to overpay.

The first give away should be the exact #s 5k responses, 20k retweets, and 50k likes..

If I remember correctly, the scenario is Dallas making multiple offers for Jamal. I'm not looking to trade him.. I don't make that offer actually expecting them to do it. The idea is not to trade him unless it's an ridiculous deal that you can't refuse.

Definitely think he's the front runner to start opposite Desir, and he should be given first opportunity to win the starting job, but they need to bring in some competition. Either through F/A or even a mid round pick, although the depth for CB this year is pretty shallow.

I'd make that demand every day of the week if someone wanted to trade for Jamal.. Only way I could see justifying it. It'd be insane to trade him away for fair trade value, unless there was some underlying reason why they want to get rid of him.

Coming from someone who is more qualified to be a GM? I would never be a GM because I don't have a career in professional football.. You don't think there have been GMs who have made outrageous trade demands before? That's what happens when someone wants to trade for a player you consider "untouchable." It has to be a deal that is too good to refuse. I think two 1s and a 2 is in that category.

If this happened, I'd cream my pants..

If they want him, they're going to have to give up more than what he's worth. That's what I'd ask for if I was GM. Which is why he'd never get traded if I was GM.

If this happens, they better not take anything less than two 1s, and a 2nd or two 3s.

I'm definitely on board with stocking up on receivers, I just feel that after the big 4 OLS (Wirfs, Becton, Wills, Thomas) there's a significant drop off. If we trade back, likely mid to later 1st, we won't get any of those guys. But we can still grab one of the tops WRs. If we take a WR with our #1 we can still get Jackson, Cleveland, or Wilson with our 2nd. I'm fine with trading back either way, be it once or twice, I think it's the right move with the current roster. I'd just like to see us nab a WR with some superstar potential, and I think there's a better chance we'll get that guy if we take a WR earlier on. I do see your point though, We don't need a true #1 for Darnold to be successful.. But wouldn't it be nice to have a game changer for him to be able to rely on every week?