Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

26 Neutral

About jcass10

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  1. I agree from a Jax standpoint, but if I was the Jets this is what I'd be pushing since he is on the tag and cant be re-signed until the end of the year. Very similar to the Leonard Williams trade this past year. I dont think I'd offer a third and future second for a one year rental. But like you said, I dont think Jacksonville would go for it.
  2. I think I'd throw Jacksonville a 3rd rounder this year, and a 2nd or 3rd rounder next year contingent on him signing a long term contract. That would allow the Jets to use their 1st rounders on WR and OL (Jamar Chase and Alex Leatherwood?). And then use their 2nd and 3rd rounders on RB and CB. I would sign up for that in a heartbeat.
  3. Well than I guess that's worst case scenario. My point was, if Sam doesn't show any improvement and the Jets are near the top of the draft (thinking top 3-5), I'd be shocked if the Jets weren't interested in Trevor Lawrence, even if it requires a trade.
  4. Thankfully, the decision will more than be made for us. If the Jets are in position to legitimately draft Lawrence, than Sam probably had a poor year, and the Jets will look to move on. If Sam has a great year, the team wont be in position to take Lawrence.
  5. I think its fairly crazy. Looking through, its not as crazy as I thought it would be though. Bills- The Jets are probably the worse team, but I dont think its crazy the Jets win 49ers- Don't see the Jets winning this. I could easily see Bosa dismantle the OL. I think the defense can slow down Garrapolo, but I dont know how they'd do against that 49er D Colts- Jets always seem to play them well. I would be disappointed if they lost. Broncos- A very winnable game that would probably disappoint me if they lost. Cardinals- Jets wouldnt be the favorite by any stretch, but I dont think a win here is all that farfetched. Chargers- Rookie QB, could definitely see a win here. Bills- Same as above. They'll probably split Chiefs- Jets lose. Patriots- I have no clue. If Cam is good, NE is probably the favorite. Dolphins- Usually play the Jets hard. Probably a worse team, but wouldnt be shocked if the Jets dropped one. Dolphins- See above Raiders- Always seem to play the Jets well, but the Jets have a shot since its at home Seahawks- Road game in Seattle against a better team. This looks like a loss. Rams- Road game against an OK team. If Goff is as bad as he looked last year, Jets can win. But I wouldnt be comfortable betting on it. Browns- They're good, but I think the Jets could potentially win. Depends on what Baker is. Patriots- See above. I can see anywhere from 6 to 10 wins.
  6. I'd be shocked if he started. They paid decent money to just about every spot on the line. Maybe he could sneak into the RT spot, but according to everything I've read he'll probably be a guard He is in an excellent position to step in when someone gets hurt and earn the job that way, though.
  7. If someone is offering a 1st and a 2nd, I trade him. It would offer too much flexibility in the draft. You could draft a blue chip OT and WR in the first, then package a 2nd and a 3rd to get back into the first to grab a C. That gives you another second and third to address CB/Pass Rusher. I like Jamal, but it would be tough to turn that down. If someone is offering a 1st and a 3rd, I think about it long and hard,then I probably take him. It still offers immense draft flexibility and allows the Jets to rebuild the offense in one draft. If the best the Jets can get is a 1st, I would probably keep Jamal. He's still the teams best player, and he is a joy to watch.
  8. I wrote this elsewhere, but according to reports the Jets turned down an offer of a first and third rounder earlier this season. I'm not sure what that means the Jets are demanding, but for the purpose of this post, I'll assume they receive first and third in this draft. An additional first and third would allow for so much flexibility in what the Jets are able to do on Thursday. Hypothetically, lets say they can get a first and a third from Oakland. This would let them to address both OT and WR at 11 and 12, hitting their two biggest needs immediately. This trade would also give them the flexibility to package a second and a third to get back into the first to further solidify the OL, or grab a CB/Pass Rusher. This would still leave them with two third round picks to further improve WRs. I'm a big Jamal fan, but if the Jets could turn him into the scenario I laid out above, I think you need to consider it.
  9. Round 1- OT Round 2- OL/WR Round 3- OL/WR Round 3- OL/WR Basically, I want two of each in the first four picks, with OT in R1. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  10. Sign Peters and draft someone to play RT this year. When Peters retires, the RT can either move to LT, or the Jets can draft an LT That's what I'd do Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  11. I think I'd probably try and trade down and acquire additional draft capital. If I couldn't do that, I'd be fine going WR in round 1 and OT in round 2. I'd bring in Jason Peter's or Trent William's for a couple years while the second round pick starts at RT. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  12. I'd be cool if they signed this guy, and drafted someone at 11 to play RT. Then in a couple years, you can move him when Peters retires. Take a C in round 2, and try to find some decent guards in FA (maybe Edoga?) Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  13. For me it really depends on the return. If the Jets could get a first rounder and a mid round pick, I'd almost consider it a no brainer. It would give the Jets the opportunity to take two offensive linemen in the first round, opening up the rest of the draft to load up on WR/CB/Edge/OL I love Jamal, but I think I would deal him if it mean getting a first and a mid round pick(s)
  14. If he finished top 15 in most major categories I think I would consider that successful. Top 15 in yards/TDs/Completion%. I dont expect him to be top 15 in INTs this year, he just doesnt seem like that kind of player. He'll definitely try to do too much and turn the ball over.
  15. Idzik had a plan you could very easily see. A plan that I think most fans would appreciate. He stockpiled pics, didnt want to overspend on free agents. Unfortunately, he executed his plan so horribly, it doesnt matter how many picks you stockpile if you dont hit. Macacagnan seemed like a smart guy, but didnt have a great plan. He didnt seem like he recognized how positional value worked in the NFL. He didnt seem to value the OL, and that killed the Jets last year. Overall, I'm gonna go with Mac being better. He drafted Darnold. If Darnold becomes the franchise QB we think he can, Mac deserves that credit.

Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
  • Create New...