Jump to content

jcass10

Members
  • Content Count

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jcass10

  1. Every single rep for Wilson. This is shaping up to be both the best group of WRs and the best OL the Jets have had in a while. I'm not sure its worth waiting for the support system to get even better.
  2. 1. Pass Rusher 2. Center 3. WR 4. CB But I'd also work extremely hard to move back and pick up a 1st Round (or later rounds) pick in 2023.
  3. I'd be very happy if the first five picks played out this way. The rest of the players I kind of just went by position, I didnt really know them. 2. Zach Wilson 23. Alijah Vera-Tucker 34. Caleb Farley 66. Landon Dickerson 86. Brevin Jordan 128. Andre Cisco 140.Seth Williams 146. Khalil Herbert 154. Victor Dimukeje 186. Sage Suratt 226. Erroll Thompson
  4. We might not know who is going to be better of those QBs. I certainly don't. The thing is, Joe Douglas thinks he knows who the best is. Cant trade back and risk losing the guy you think is going to be the best.
  5. Got mine last week. Got the J&J from the Stop & Shop in Long Beach. In and out in about 15 minutes. I had super mild symptoms (tired, dehydrated), and they lasted about two days. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  6. Kiper's argument this whole time has been "Darnold was a better QB prospect than Wilson and Fields, so they should stick with him." For argument's sake, we'll say Kiper is correct. He's literally ignoring three years of pretty bad NFL QB play. At some point, Darnold needs to be judged on his NFL play, rather than college potential. I'm one of those people that thinks the Jets absolutely failed Darnold. They surrounded him with nothing, and he never got better. It sucks, but it is what it is. Now you get a chance to reset the cap and try again with a cheap, blue chip QB prospect. The
  7. Its tough to argue with stats. In addition, the best ability is availability. I dont think I'd give anyone flak if they thought Wirfs was better. Having said that: 1. Wirfs is playing RT. Its a little easier for the QBs to avoid sacks if they can see where the pressure is coming from. 2. His QB is Tom Brady, He makes all linemen look really really good. His ability to read defenses and get rid of the ball really helps the OL The moral of the story is, I'm happy with Becton. I wouldnt be confident in saying Wirfs would be better at LT on the Jets than Becton would be.
  8. This. I do think it will effectively be a three team trade, There is a good chance that whatever the Jets get Darnold will basically be forwarded to Houston.
  9. To me, a big question is, what is more valuable: 1. Darnold and the second pick 2. Tua and the third pick If Houston likes Tua, they have no reason to trade with the Jets. They get the QB they like and a blue chip draft pick. Can probably draft a premier WR for Tua to grow with, giving them a blue chip QB, WR, and LT. If Houston doesn't like Tua, they probably need to trade with the Jets. If you trade with the Dolphins you are behind two teams that are probably taking QBs. If you have a strong preference between Fields and Wilson, you cant really risk trading to three. The Jets can t
  10. For a TE, probably. I certainly wouldn't hesitate to take him with Seattle's pick, but he'll probably be a top 10 pick or so. I'm pretty much all in taking an OL with Seattle's pick. Wherever the value on the OL is, is where I'm going. I've recently been warming on a RT. The amount of times pass rushers have just moved to the other side to avoid Becton has been brutal. This would hopefully eliminate that. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  11. OL and WR If Douglas can manage to pick up another second rounder somewhere (Darnold or potential tradeback), I'd take a CB or pass rusher. I think both OL and WR need to be addressed in both free agency and the draft. With the amount of times that I've seen pass rushers avoid Becton, there's a lot of value in a RT if one falls. If the Jets are going to get Lawrence, they owe it to him to put him in the best situation to succeed. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  12. I think they'll get a mid to late second round pick for Darnold. Probably a fourth or fifth as well. I also think either Seattle's first or the Jets second is going to be traded back, and will net them an additional third. That will give them two first rounders (QB/OL), two second rounders (WR/CB), and three third rounders (RB/Defense/OL)
  13. I don't think it matters what people label him. The fact of the matter is, he's regressed during a year when the Jets are in position to take one of the best college football prospects ever. Not only are they getting a better prospect, they're getting one on a rookie deal. That can't be undersold. This will give them the ability to sign and draft OL and WR. Combining that with a new coach, taking Lawrence is a no brainer. For what its worth, I absolutely think the Jets ruined Darnold. I generally dont blame the team for a player being bad, but I've seen too much good from Darnold to belie
  14. I'm thinking Center or Guard in the first. If we trade Darnold for a second rounder, I'd address WR and Defense in the second. Then Defense and RB in the 3rd. Having said that, I definitely think the Seattle first or the Jets second are going to be traded back.
  15. I don't know enough about the specific players, so the positions I want may not match up realistically to the field of players. Everything is built around Trevor Lawrence for me. For Free Agency, I'm bringing in either the best G or C available (Thuney?). Becton is an animal, and Fant looks to be a more than good enough RT. My goal is to bring in the best OG in the class, and draft the top C with the Seattle pick. Move McGovern to G, and there is your starting OL. 1A- Trevor Lawrence. I loved Darnold, but Lawrence is a significantly better prospect on a rookie deal. Can't pass that up.
  16. I'd have no issues taking him in the first round if QB isnt an option. Move Becton to RT and not worry about the OT position for a long ass time. Take a WR with the Seattle pick. I'd also be fine taking an elite WR (Chase) and addressing OL with the Seattle pick. With the second round pick, I'd go with edge rusher or CB. Whomever is the better player (although I wouldnt be surprised to see this pick traded) With the third rounders, I'd take the defensive position that wasnt addressed in the second round and WR.
  17. Its a bit of a toss up for me. The logic behind the Jets move was sound. They packaged picks to get a franchise QB, the most important position in the game. I cant fault them too much for that. It remains to be seen if its going to work out (but its looking like it wont). Its tough to part with draft picks, but the one time its OK, is when its for a franchise QB The Giants took a super unvaluable position with an extremely valuable pick. It was not a logical move from my perspective. Giants presumably could have traded back, or taken Quentin Nelson. Both would probably have them in a bett
  18. I agree from a Jax standpoint, but if I was the Jets this is what I'd be pushing since he is on the tag and cant be re-signed until the end of the year. Very similar to the Leonard Williams trade this past year. I dont think I'd offer a third and future second for a one year rental. But like you said, I dont think Jacksonville would go for it.
  19. I think I'd throw Jacksonville a 3rd rounder this year, and a 2nd or 3rd rounder next year contingent on him signing a long term contract. That would allow the Jets to use their 1st rounders on WR and OL (Jamar Chase and Alex Leatherwood?). And then use their 2nd and 3rd rounders on RB and CB. I would sign up for that in a heartbeat.
  20. Well than I guess that's worst case scenario. My point was, if Sam doesn't show any improvement and the Jets are near the top of the draft (thinking top 3-5), I'd be shocked if the Jets weren't interested in Trevor Lawrence, even if it requires a trade.
  21. Thankfully, the decision will more than be made for us. If the Jets are in position to legitimately draft Lawrence, than Sam probably had a poor year, and the Jets will look to move on. If Sam has a great year, the team wont be in position to take Lawrence.
  22. I think its fairly crazy. Looking through, its not as crazy as I thought it would be though. Bills- The Jets are probably the worse team, but I dont think its crazy the Jets win 49ers- Don't see the Jets winning this. I could easily see Bosa dismantle the OL. I think the defense can slow down Garrapolo, but I dont know how they'd do against that 49er D Colts- Jets always seem to play them well. I would be disappointed if they lost. Broncos- A very winnable game that would probably disappoint me if they lost. Cardinals- Jets wouldnt be the favorite by any stretch, but I
  23. I'd be shocked if he started. They paid decent money to just about every spot on the line. Maybe he could sneak into the RT spot, but according to everything I've read he'll probably be a guard He is in an excellent position to step in when someone gets hurt and earn the job that way, though.
  24. If someone is offering a 1st and a 2nd, I trade him. It would offer too much flexibility in the draft. You could draft a blue chip OT and WR in the first, then package a 2nd and a 3rd to get back into the first to grab a C. That gives you another second and third to address CB/Pass Rusher. I like Jamal, but it would be tough to turn that down. If someone is offering a 1st and a 3rd, I think about it long and hard,then I probably take him. It still offers immense draft flexibility and allows the Jets to rebuild the offense in one draft. If the best the Jets can get is a 1st, I would p
  25. I wrote this elsewhere, but according to reports the Jets turned down an offer of a first and third rounder earlier this season. I'm not sure what that means the Jets are demanding, but for the purpose of this post, I'll assume they receive first and third in this draft. An additional first and third would allow for so much flexibility in what the Jets are able to do on Thursday. Hypothetically, lets say they can get a first and a third from Oakland. This would let them to address both OT and WR at 11 and 12, hitting their two biggest needs immediately. This trade would also give the
×
×
  • Create New...