IntoTheGreen

Just because you see player x is a FA and it's a known commodity, that doesnt automatically mean it's a good fit or that our coaches approve. Still important information in terms of allocation of funds. Maybe they see similar tape/roles for players costing way less? In any case, they're spending this time watching college film too. Sorry to disappoint you but they've got access to better quality film than your jpegs on the dark web. Nice try though.

All the coaches are catching up watching film on impending FAs. Remember they missed a week doing Senior Bowl. If they're present for interviews that seems like a much better use of resources and time.

NFL Network always streams

Our window moves up to immediately if we Feild an explosive offense. If he becomes the missing peice next to Moore and Davis, it's worth it.

He was already a college OC at Wagner on Staten Island. In theory it looks good that we hired a good staff but the reality is the Jets need at least one more year of stability around Zach. I also think if this coaching staff were to succeed, he'd be the prime candidate to be groomed for future OC if LeFleur were to get a HC job. Our coaches need to help him see the big picture and practice patience.

To some extent. If this next draft is just ok, but Zach seems to take the next step JD is safe. If JD has a great draft, the team improves, but Zach stinks then they are in position to add a vet qb for a run as the new NFL model.

You've been around long enough to see the results of picking the "best player" in the draft how many times now? It hasn't worked. While I agree to some extent that the talent is important...hence his inclination to draft high RAS, but wouldn't it be nice to have a well defined scheme that you can identify players for. There is a reason teams like Pitt, Bal, Pat's keep churning out good D into playoff runs. It starts with stability and scheme.

Dont see how Chark is under spending big. Cant deny the talent, but hes always injured. Not even banged up here and there injured...missing significant time in 2 of 3 seasons injured. Cant deny when hes played hes made an impact, but I can only see this going 1 of 2 ways: decent money for 1 year probe it deal OR small money on longer term.

My memory is that bad lol I thought Pennington was after leftwich. Geeze.

This. Really jumps out on full game film. I want to like him so much more. I'm desperate to vault a WR high enough for #10. But despite his height/weight/speed and doing things that translates well to this O, hes very raw and flawed as a prospect. I just don't see it.

Leftwich to Moss or was he after Moss?

He's never done it. Not even as an UDFA. He's all of a sudden going to do it now? Sorry, not happening.

At 9 mill I'm not taking either, but in no world is Anderson more valuable as a #4 when he doesnt play specials and Berrios is more than solid on specials.

I'm more concerned that Watson isn't this years Mims. Tall, fast, good 1v1 at the senior bowl that made me think he had better route running ability than what Baylor asked. He was my 5th overall WR that year...cant believe I was so wrong.

T-minus 4 days ago...

Baseball seems to be doing this a lot now. Will definitely be interesting to see if it can translate.

Wait...you claim not to know the psychology of people you never met - Watson - but then make a blanket psychological statement about the women - feeling powerless to act.

If it's a weak class I'd rather trade draft capital for players or to acquire extra capital for next year. What good is 9 picks if itll turn out to be '20s class?

Makes sense on both accounts. Late first would give them the 5th year of control still. Which for a player who wont start right away is needed. The cost/year is also much lower to offset the Darnold contract.

The flip arguement only works if you can increase a players value. Much harder to do when you're already using the 10 pick. Either way it's not happening.

I'd also say go with the strength of the draft. If its deep at a position dont just wait and take value. Stack one position and it becomes a strength and depth.

Not something I really considered but a very good point for resource allocation. Maybe it causes him to slide a bit if other teams have this thought process too. Of course all it takes is one.

10 to 13 gets a first and 45 but 6 to 24 only gets a first and 56? Weird. It's all fairly unrealistic to acquire those assets anyway so...

At the end of the day logic is good. Wouldn't love it personally, but I can live with it.

It's a different take on approach so I commend you for that. I just dont love the idea of investing a premium pick on a CB for this D. Id rather take the shot at EDGE and get whoever they like most. Also don't want to bank on Njoku so much that we wait that long for a TE. No complaints on the options there.