Jump to content

TheNuuFaaolaExperience

Members
  • Content Count

    698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TheNuuFaaolaExperience

  • Rank
    Head Gase

Profile Information

  • Location
    New Jersey

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Anything I said was in response to him. I'm totally cool with you.
  2. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    It's getting close. I was enjoying tooling on him, but it's getting old.
  3. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Dee Ford - 0 sacks, 0 tackles

    Dee Ford played like Dee Snuts.
  4. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    I started a positivity thread and this guy comes in with nothing but negative answers. There was no way in hell that this "debate" was going to be civil. I posted objectively positive things that ownership did, and it was generally well received. He took exception to my optimism. His first post ended with "There's no credit to be given here at all." You can't reason with someone like that.
  5. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Who are you that I have to answer any of your questions? I tend to not take "debates" with people who have contradictory opinions very seriously. I'm not even trying, but I'm still making you look foolish. Gase is not responsible for Peyton Manning's success, but is totally responsible for Tannehill's lack of success. How do I argue with something like that?
  6. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Would you support Replay on PI?

    I'd be ok with challenges on blatant screw ups like the missed PI in the Saints game.
  7. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Uh, no. You are getting destroyed. I agree. This is a massacre, and I see it.
  8. I'm not even sure Bowles adjusted his nuts, let alone the game plan.
  9. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    What are we doing at WR this offseason

    His numbers are comparable to Bell. An injury tends to slow someone down. I never said that we should have a productive back. Bell's price tag doesn't match his production, or value to the team. I'd gladly take Bell on a reasonable contract. The front end of his contract might be tolerable, but years 3 and 4 are going to wreck the cap if he falls off like most modern running backs do. See: Demarco Murray.
  10. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Dude. You are SPOT on! Bravo!
  11. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    For the folks at home, this is what started this "debate." Gase gets no credit for Peyton Manning because he was already Peyton Manning, and you know what, I don't disagree. Manning was going to be Manning no matter what. You don't get to turn around and then say that he couldn't help Tannehill. Nobody could help him. At his best, he is slightly above average. At his worst, he is Ryan Tannehill. I was trying to look at the positives of this upcoming year. It wasn't a coronation of a new dynasty. Bringing in a coach specifically to develop Darnold is a positive, at the moment, and you really will have a hard time convincing most people otherwise.
  12. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Your argument is awful, but yet you continue to defend it. I commend you for your preserverence, even though you are wrong. I did concede that you are losing this argument, but I guess you saw right past my obvious swerve. A real sharp one, aint ya? I was using your own words to mock you, but you didn't quite catch that one, so maybe you aren't the brightest bulb in the bunch. I'll gladly keep winning this argument if you want, but I'd rather just agree that this isn't going anywhere, especially when one of us (you) is wrong. Remember, I don't have to defend my stance on YOUR opinion. The honus is on your to convince other's that you are correct.
  13. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Gase didn't help Manning because he was Peyton Manning. Gase didn't help Tannehill, but it's his fault that he didn't turn a JAG into Peyton Manning. I understand your point, and it's awful.
  14. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    Exactly what I'm saying. Y our position is incorerct and people will see that. Thanks.
  15. TheNuuFaaolaExperience

    Giving credit where credit is due, regardless of past failures

    I made the mistake of reading your long winded comment and came out with the same thing as not reading it. I concede that you have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks.

Content Partnership

Yes Network

Websites, SEO & Social Media

Mile Social
×