TheMo

Yes. He's been an OC for quite some time. He was the Jacksonville coordinator when bortles looked great that one year. He also was Derek Carrs OC during his first year starting. Also coordinated for Freeman the one year he looked great. Was on the Rams last year but hard to know how much was him and how much was McVay. Have to think he had done decent input since he's not some green coach and has done it a bunch. And now under Gruden in Oakland. Again hard to know how much he's had input this year, but nice to see that Gruden wanted him on board.

I honestly don't think he should be behind Toub. I feel like he's just less of the new flavor this year and so he falls behind. His credentials are actually better if you ask me.

A name I haven't seen talked about but has a ton of experience. Has been an assistant HC like Toub. He's worked with a bunch of young QBs and seems to have has good success. Some of the QBs have actually not been that talented and he's gotten a lot out of them. Bottles and Freeman are the most stark examples. With more talented QBs like Goff last year and the two times he has coached Carr he's produced pretty good results.

I'm a physician and have a background in science. You say you're trying to be neutral. That's commendable. So let's stay neutral. What you are proposing to me is that I make an important decision based off of a 4 game sample size rather than a 60 game sample size. The 60 game sample size has an similar diversity to my 4 games and Is actually more similar to future 16 game samples aka seasons. So from a neutral science basis your argument does not seem to hold any merit. How do you defend your point from a neutral standpoint?

Why does no one mention defillipo I think that guy would be great for darnold and has been around a bunch of different stops. Think he's primed to make the jump.

Jeff Fischer didn't ruin Goff. I am pretty certain the GM and coach need to go. Hopefully they bring an OC in as the new HC for him to flourish under. I'm thinking John DeFillipo from Minnesota

Why? I mean it would be akin to a cousins situation. Imagine he puts up 25tds and 7 picks. You gonna franchise him or just say oh what the heck and let him hit FA. If I am the FO I tag him before letting that happen

You could always franchise him if he truly lights it up.

I would agree. Typically we would think some sort of genetic inborn issue. If it's steroids that's actually better for the young man, in that he wouldn't have to worry about it once he stopped. Hard to know without the whole story.

A maximum of two years is typically the duration of warfarin therapy for a patient with a first time unprovoked PE. Again I don't know his history so obviously his doctor who has access to that info thought he could be off the blood thinners sooner. And yes I understand that a PE is more significant than a DVT. However, the treatment protocols we use as physicians only change in duration and are no longer an immediate cause for lifelong warfarin.

Obviously don't know his full medical history. But as a physician I can say that for unprovoked blood clots patients typically get 6 months of anticoagulation. After that point they don't get anything. Unprovoked is just another way of saying there was no known inciting cause.