Jump to content

riggy001

Members
  • Content Count

    361
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by riggy001

  1. Beautiful day, made the mistake of wasting 2 plus hours on this garbage. Won’t make that mistake again. We will be 2-15.
  2. The less posted about Darnold, the better, its the last thread i plan to read on him. He is just another guy , playing for a different team, i truly , could not care less about him.
  3. I agree , i don’t think we will have an 80-85 catch wr this yr, but several will have 50 plus..
  4. Mike tomlin d coach, Ben R
  5. Seattle is not going to win less than 9-10 games with Russell Wilson. Pick will likely be 15-20 range, ours likely top 10.
  6. Yes, cut both smiths, or put on practice squad
  7. And another 80 mill in cap space next yr
  8. Really?.. maybe they should just stop the draft after 3 rds... . Because no picks after the 3rd rd ever make an impact... i dont think he makes all 6 , probably uses to move up a few spots..
  9. Relax, i am ok if we keep him, just not sure JD is gonna spend 10 mill on 4th receiver....
  10. Absolutely not, for rest of night, sign sherman, and see what you can get for Crowder, if nothing, cut him and use 10 mill on another fa cb, etc
  11. Agree, and i think he will drive a much stronger trade, than most on this board are proposing..i am confident of that..
  12. Absolutely. 3 1s and 2 2s, in a reported stronger draft.. one caveat, i would not make the trade with a team like kc or tampa, since pick will likely be around 30, not great value considering its next yrs pick..
  13. They definitely use the charts as a baseline, but there are many exceptions, its pure supply and demand, and i disagree about this pick, there are 3 or 4 guys that were predicted to go in the 1st, and are in high demand. Even rappaport reported that Joe may be able to trade it for a 1st next yr
  14. No, even if we drop 5-6 spots, a third is minimum...and better be a high one...
  15. Per the pts system, the pick is worth 560 pts, that would be something like chicagos 52 and 83, to me, not nearly enough to move down...i would take 52, and a two next yr.. for example..
  16. Exactly, as i said earlier today, this is not a time to trade for chart value, this is a very valuable pick, and i want to significantly exceed the point system number
  17. Yep, i don’t ever see Darnold being a top 20 qb. If jenkins is there, take him, otherwise, take a strong offer to trade down... line will have been remade...
  18. Yes, this team is in early stage rebuild. Its a 5 win team at best. Goal is to set up foundation with Ol, establish new qb, and get new offensive and defensive systems in place. Next yrs draft and free agency will be all about adding top play makers..
  19. Actually he Should do better than that, its the second pick in 2nd rd, high value, at minimum mid two this yr, and 2 next yr, or make the pick. This a place where you should get more than regular pts value..
  20. Listen, giving up the 2 3rds is tough, but they clearly got the guy, at a need position, that they had targeted all along.. can,t be disappointed with that. Unless they love a player at 34, its a great spot for a trade down, likely for a late second in this draft, as well as another 2nd next yr...imagine 2 1’s and 3 2’s next year to continue the rebuild..
  21. Gilmore is not even healthy, and with his salary, they would get a 4th rd pick at best..
×
×
  • Create New...