Jump to content

Edgy

Members
  • Content Count

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Edgy

  1. I think the theory is that while Kellen would be the Depth chart #2, Smith would be listed as the game day #2, which means that Kellen couldn't come in for a series until the fourth, it would have to be Smith. Again, theory being, that if Penny is out for more than a series or two, he's not coming back, and we have more to worry about than if we can have a trick play from Smith. With Smith as the official #2, he can play anywhere, including QB, WR and Special teams. I still think it's far fetched, and would suck for Kellen.
  2. Sorry, you're right... he had to dig up something that another reporter had written about a player unimportant to both teams.... much different...
  3. No - Ball is def... a jag and wittle kittly cat, as you say. My point is, Cimni has to find this guy who briefly, uh 'played' with Mangini, and dig up what he has to say about having been in multiple systems over three years, twist it a bit (to leave out the 'made me mentally stronger side'), all to try and keep up his "This Mangini hard-line is going to fail" campaign he's got going ever since his gravy train left for greener-bbqs.
  4. Cimni's negative nelly strikes again... check out this in the comments:
  5. Just curious - do you get one for each game, or a single one that is good for the season? Thinking about getting a single game or two (still waiting on the list) and wondering if I can try and get tickets with the pass.
  6. This is what stinks about this.... the guy gets to take our playbook to a division rival? And he finds out what we've been working on, and how we block on the line, etc...? Or do we just not coach our O line when Ken-doll is around? Yuck.
  7. I haven't seen specifics of the restructure actually ever released, but I'm pretty sure there were some significant playing time clauses in it that would allow Chad to make back all of the money he was expected to make in '06. Forget '07, this was 'if you last the whole season, then we'll pay you like you were worth' money. To add insult to injury, now that he's performed, he'll get paid that way again this year - but his actual cap for this year will be as if it's the original 06 AND 07 numbers all in 07. A worthwhile way to go - but as far as 07 is concerned, it's a bit of a dou
  8. I know you don't believe me... but Chad's incentives were NLTBE, so you've got between 3m and 6m more coming off.
  9. I don't think that there is a distinction between injury or second string. How would the league office determine if a coach didn't play a guy in a certain game because he wasn't healthy yet, or because his replacement looked better? Here's a page from the atlanta falcons site that goes into it, and doesn't mention anything about injury http://www.atlantafalcons.com/team/article.jsp?id=2699 - as a matter of fact, I've never seen any site that clarifys anythingn other than previous season performance. No big deal - but I highly suspect that we're losing a substantial am
  10. Actually, I think this isn't true. (Apologies from a long time lurker to a long time poster.. LTBE calculations are, to my knowledge, simply made based on the previous year of the player. Since Chad only started 3 games in 2005( see http://www.newyorkjets.com/players/stats/chad-pennington ) than if the games started number was greater than 3, it would not be LTBE, and as such, would not count toward the cap number. The exception, of course, is if the renegotiation occurs after the start of the season. IF this occurs, all are considered LTBE.
  11. Brutal, horrible. Darn Houston.
  12. Dilfer wanted to go home, as far as I know...
  13. He did do all teams - if you look at the PPT link at the bottom, it shows the actual players names. I think this is great stuff - one question I would have is how he came up with the criteria for the QB (there's both starting and a QB rating requirement to not be a bust) whearas other positions can start (but stink) and still be a starter. Take that as a question - certainly not a criticism - as I think this is amazing good stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...