Jump to content

CTM

Members
  • Content Count

    48,936
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    97

Posts posted by CTM

  1. I don't get it. This seems like it's so obviously going to be a disaster. I wasn't a big Darnold guy but atleast there was some things you could point to with him in order to be optimistic. I don't see much with Wilson. Even his highlight videos are laced with under throws, atleast the ones I've seen.

    Kind of blows my mind that he's going #2

    • Upvote 1
  2. On 4/13/2021 at 3:13 PM, fullblast said:

    We will regret passing on Fields.

    I can't decide if this is more accurate than 

    We will regret drafting Zach Wilson

    close call

    • Haha 2
  3. 6 minutes ago, win4ever said:

    From my understanding, the cast comes from PFF ratings of supporting casts, but I don't have access to PFF.  The way it was explained to me was that it takes supporting cast vs defense (because there's no way anyone is touching Alabama in supporting cast) and uses that as the basis for the axis.  

    Got it. It reads like some.metric of projected draft positions of offensive teammates 

    • Upvote 1
  4. On 4/8/2021 at 3:31 PM, win4ever said:

    The X axis on the graph, rates supporting cast in line with competition.  For example, Alabama's supporting cast would blow the lid of anyone else, but it's compared to the defenses they faced in the SEC.  So the further right on the chart, the better cast you had to your competition.  The further left you go, the worse your cast vs. competition.  The further up you go, the better you did, and the further down you go, the worse you did. 

    It just says cast, I know QBase uses or used teammates who would be drafted early as supporting cast. They also adjust for defenses faced 2 different things. You are sayig this combines it and calls it supporting cast?

  5. 28 minutes ago, greenwichjetfan said:

    I mean, sure if someone woke up every day for 20 years and forced twinkies and burgers into someone else’s body via a machine which requires a chemical explosive to generate force; thereby causing obesity and its various comorbodities - then maybe I could see where you were going. But only if the story was covered in a thread on JN.  /shrug.

    ehh, not to get political but dc corruption  + and the food business kinda did that all these years. High fructose corn syrup is right up there with dirtsticks

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-diet-farm-subsidies/foods-from-subsidized-commodities-tied-to-obesity-idUSKCN0ZL2ER

  6. 5 minutes ago, Tranquilo said:

    That was one of about 6 videos. You should check out the rest.

    I saw a few of them. I don't think he's very high on him.

    Truthfully I don't know what his track record is and can give **** all but he certainly points out some sigificant issues

    • Upvote 1
  7. 30 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

    Really? Maybe im wrong, but it didn’t sound like that. I just listened to this interview w/ JT & when said what he likes most about Wilson. He said he liked a lot of things about him - but what he’s most jealous of as a former QB is the way he spins it. Said he has really clean and consistent upper body mechanics. Has the ability to make all the throws, inside the pocket, outside the pocket, anticipation throws, everything. 
     

    I don’t dispute he said anything of that other stuff but he sounds like he’s high on him.

    he has a video titled "zach wilson, what am i missing" and released an aprils fools video where he ranked Wilson #1

    At the end of the day these are kids so most decent folk are going to talk about positives for any of these guys

  8. 1 hour ago, Jetsfan80 said:

    This being debated doesn't make it an actual issue for QB prospects.  It just makes it....a debate.  Find me a negative correlation between QB's who came up in affluent families and those who failed in the pros and then there would be something worth looking at.  Scouts debate stupid sh*t all the time that just doesn't end up being a factor.  

    You are going to go full Paccagnan when/if/when WIlson busts, aren't you

  9. 34 minutes ago, win4ever said:

    I think I posted the chart here at some point in the QB thread, but I'll attach it here.  Wilson's supporting cast vs. level of competition was rated much higher than Fields' supporting cast vs. level of competition.  BYU won't be the same, because Wilson is a pro level QB and that's always going to be a downswing for a program.  Clemson had a down year after Watson left with Bryant.  So did NC after Tribusky too, but that doesn't really help him in the NFL.  BYU also won't be the same because they'll actually have real competition to face, and not fodder.  

    I don't like Tua, either.  Tua quite possibly had 5 first round WRs, and a first rd caliber RB with an amazing OL.  Tua's situation is completely off the charts because I'm not sure there has been a team THAT loaded for a QB.  

    image0.jpeg

    WHere is level of competition on here?

  10. 52 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

    I think Wilson & Darnold do a lot of the same things as far as being a gunslinger & off schedule playmaker, I just think Wilson’s mechanics and form are so much cleaner, I think he sees the fields better, I do think he can get a little bit too risky for my preference at times, but I really like that he dirts passes, throws ball away and lives to fight another down much more than Sam. He has a better understanding of limitations within the play. 

    I think thats fair but the flip side is the injury potential. Not only does he have a banged up shoulder but he looks a littlle slight for sundays

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...