Jump to content

gang_green03

Members
  • Content Count

    1,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,091 Neutral

About gang_green03

  • Rank
    2nd Year Veteran
  • Birthday 10/19/1985
  1. Sooo excited even though he'll hold out for an insane deal in 3 years. Also mad props to incarcerated bob! That's my new boy sorry for doubting you.
  2. Cimini also seems to have a huge problem himself with Francessa lately. I was looking at one of his espn chats a week or 2 ago and he went out of his way to bash Francessa for his portrayal of the Revis situation and having a Jets bias in general. Something to the effect of "Fatcessa is a giants fan...etc" so this has been going on for a while. Not sure what he did to Cimini specifically or if he's just bothered by extreme bias and misleading comments.
  3. Of course they'll resign him barring anything ridiculous like an injury or severe dropoff in play. Teams don't just let their best players go. How many times has a CB of his caliber and age become an UFA? Potentially they could consider trading him I guess if Wilson turned into an all-pro Cromartie reached his potential but those are highly unlikely scenarios. Of all the players coming up the one I'm most concerned about losing is Harris.
  4. By that definition every USC player Carroll passed on won't succeed in the NFL. You know that doen't make sense. I think this kid should be able to approximate what Leon gave us. Probably not quite as good but his skills translate favorably to the situations he'll be put in.
  5. Its a unique theory but it doesn't make all that much sense to me since pretty much all reports on him look at him as a guard or RT. It seems much more likely that they view him similarly and see him as a future replacement for Woody and i that doesn't work out he can stay at guard. Brick is a borderline elite young LT. If they were looking to replace him I'm pretty sure they wouldn't hedge their bets on a kid that at best is a questionable fit at the position. Again, especially when they're old at other positions on the line that Ducasse fits ideally.
  6. Some of his points are fair although I disagree. I also think its fair to say people in the media are going to overrate Faneca but replacing him with an uproven commodity does come with some risk. Basically since we're getting rid of relatively big name and proven players many casual fans/media will question the moves.
  7. I like the draft overall so I'll give it a solid B. Liked the Wilson pick initially but after thinking about it I really love the flexibility it gives us. Ducasse is a good pick and good value. He looks like he can be a nice guard long term. Again, really like the McKnight pick and I think he can approximate what Leon gives us. The only pick I'm not a fan of is the Conner selection since I don't see the point in taking a FB that high with our other needs and other players left on the board. The main thing about this draft is I think there's some players that they missed that they could'v
  8. I saw an interesting point made on another board that the Jets are drafting more so with the future in mind compared to what the did in the offseason with all the other moves made for the present. I like that they seem to be drafting with the BPA philosophy but the Conner pick makes little sense to me. There had to be some dline/pass rushing prospects that graded out similar on their board.
  9. I don't have a problem with the trade so much as who we picked. Considering all the other players that garnered similar compensation I don't know how you could've expected much more.
  10. Terrible pick and the only one I've hated so far. Was he really the highest on their board. I can see trading Leon but taking a FB? Seriously?!
  11. This move has me a little concerened because I know little about Slauson and Ducasse is so raw but I'm ok with it since Fanaca's game was clearly slipping along with his large salary. People overreacting to this are doing so mostly because of the name rather than actual play on the field. He fails both the statistical and eyeball tests so I'm not overly worried about a huge dropoff unless they've seriously miscalculated the skills of both Slauson and Ducasse. At worst I think either can approximate what Fanaca gave us last year. Also, I guess there's a chance he resigns for less money.
  12. Pretty ridiculous value. He'll probably get suspended for 4 games or something but still a great trade. Tannenbaum is putting in work. Not complaining but I really can't understand this from the steelers at all. I know they're tired of his nonsense but to just dump him for a late 5th rounder is just stupid considering he's one of their best young players and was just the superbowl MVP.
  13. That's why I would pass as well. They're games are to similar. I guess you could argue he'd be good value and also insurance if Braylon leaves but I think there will be other good players their who can contribute more. Not worth the risk for us.
  14. He would be amazing value at that spot but the chances of that happening are pretty astronomical IMO. I could see him falling to the late teens, maybe early 20s, though so I guess they could potentially trade up if they really wanted him. Still that's doubtful as well.
  15. I would much rather have Odrick. While I like Odrick better, I can hear the arguement that they provide similar value at the end of the 1st, but we are pretty old and thin on the defensive line and I think slot receivers can be found easier. If we took Odrick he would be a candidate to be a starter where if it was Tate we'd be grooming him as a slot WR or just a weapon in general, but probably not the starter, and that becomes a lock if we keep Edwards. Tate would then become potentially the 4th option after Braylon, Cotch, and Keller and that's to much of a luxury to spend a 1st rounder on wh
×
×
  • Create New...