Ruby2

I don't mind dumping all our 3-4 players because they aren't very good in the 3-4. The 3-4 does have a higher ceiling than the 4-3, just it's floor is much much lower. We havent been able to pull it off for a long time. It's time to try something easier, even if the ceiling isn't as high. I also beieve Anderson is a FA? But could be mistaken.

Of course it is a problem. We've ran a 3-4 for 15 years without a competent OLB. The whole key to a good 3-4. Either get one or ditch the scheme. You can't have both.

Anything that gets rid of the 3-4 should be viewed as an extreme positive.

A select few here were telling everyone the whole time how reidiculously over rated McCarthy was on the board. Its ok, thats what being a fan of this clownshow franchise can do to decent people. They see a name, a super bowl and want to believe the other 14 years of mediocrity and awful play calling and decision making didn't exist. Gase isn't a perfect hire either but he sure brings a lot more to the table than McCarthy.

Its well past time to switch to 4-3 A great 3-4 is better than a 4-3 but it is way harder to make the 3-4 work imo.

We are already ****ed because we still have Mac. Nothing matters until he is gone. Franchise can not get out of its own way.

They really didn't though but ok. That team in the past would have blown it.

Meh, They gave up some scores late when they were allready up big. That happens all the time in todays NFL with prevent and what not. They manhandled the Ravens.

This really was the start of the downfall. Much worse pick than Kyle Wilson. Wilson's draft completely sucked, that one was forgivable. This was the one that laid the framework for ineptitude.

The Chargers are much more talented than the Pats. The Chargers under Lynn have seemed to shed their choking persona, so I think they have a really good shot to get the win.

This is what constitutes media in 2019

The point was someone compared McCarthy to Reid in terms of someone who could have success with another team after being fired. I just thought that wasn't the best comparison because in my opinion Reid achieved more success in ratio to the actual talent of qbs he had to work with. Im so-so on McCarthy. I think he is a bad in game manager, bad with challenges, and at times hasn't shown willingness to change his philosophy. That being said I think he would help restore a level of normalcy to the franchise. If we are going retread, he is definitely the best available, although i'd be skeptical of it really working out in the long run.

The whole thing started when I was responding to a post saying that McCarthy and Reid were in similar situations after getting fired by their first teams.

Ayee ok Mike McCarthy is better than Andy Reid. You people are bonkers.

They are not Brooks Bolinger, but they are also not even the same league of talent as Rodgers, and all their best seasons came under Reid. Reid did more with less. And Donovan McNaabb shouldnt even sniff the hof