Jump to content

ATTENTION:: Mock Draft discussion thread


Green Jets & Ham

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 750
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nice pick by TX.

Texans could look at a few other areas too but Spears makes sense from a 3-4 prospective.

Texans are really confusing me lately. They are trying to deal both their inside linebackers in Sharper and Foreman and they overpaid big time for Morlon Greenwood. Who is a poor mans Bobby Houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice pick by TX.

Texans could look at a few other areas too but Spears makes sense from a 3-4 prospective.

Texans are really confusing me lately. They are trying to deal both their inside linebackers in Sharper and Foreman and they overpaid big time for Morlon Greenwood. Who is a poor mans Bobby Houston.

Right on YJF. Spears versatility make him a good fit for the Texans who need big help on the D-line.

I have no idea what they are thinking about Sharper and Foreman. :shock:

I'd love to see the Pats make a run at Sharper. The guy has always impressed me watching him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to say the same thing. Parcells would stand him up in the 3-4, where I think he's best suited anyway.

That's what I was thinking too. I don't want to go too much into detail about my thoughts and reasoning because I don't want to give away my second pick. I will explain it all when I'm done with my second pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my pick of Benson: I STRONGLY considered Merriman but IMO Benson was the BPA.

You can't go too far wrong with BPA and there have been whispers that Mike Bennett's on the block.

If Bennett's sent packing for something it's justifiable. In reality I'd like to trade down but that's not an option and I'm NOT passing on a top 4 talent for one of the position of need players who are 10-20 caliber talents.

RB was not a need at all, but the ONLY position you pass on a clearcut BPA for is QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RS, don't worry about the Vikings stable of mediocre RB's

I have a theory about RB's {and all positions} ... unless you already have a FRANCHISE RB, you never have to apologize for selecting what you believe is a franchise RB in the draft

IMO the Vikings have a bunch of RB's, but they are also a bunch of JAG's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wanted to go defense there......but the loss of Mushin, and Steve Smith coming back from injury made the pick a no brainer

This was good pick in a position it was needed by Panthers- Carolina needed a wide receiver to replace Mohammad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wanted to go defense there......but the loss of Mushin, and Steve Smith coming back from injury made the pick a no brainer

Good choice. The Panther defense is set, considering the conference, and division, they play in. Give Delhomme another weapon, and you can pencil the Panthers in as the NFC South champs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good choice. The Panther defense is set, considering the conference, and division, they play in. Give Delhomme another weapon, and you can pencil the Panthers in as the NFC South champs.

Don't count out Michael Vick!!!

Just kidding, always wanted to say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

''Pac Man'' 16th. Most scouts and gurus seem to think he will end up going top 10, but I think that we got it right; he will end up in the 12-18 range because he simply is not a better FOOTBALL PLAYER than Antrel Rolle (or at least GM's will decide on this).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...