Jump to content

RA Dickey great story


faba

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 2 weeks later...

So I know I'm being a homer and all with this, but if he can go into the break with 13, I'd say 25 wins is pretty feasible at this point. Particularly if it's a tight race down the stretch, since he's a knuckleballer, I could see Collins using him on shorter rest a couple times to lock up one of the wild cards. And that's not even counting what the divisional possibilities could be if Washington really does stay true to their word and shuts Strasburg down.

Regardless, I was 4 when Doc won 24 and the Cy. This is pretty ****ing awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I know I'm being a homer and all with this, but if he can go into the break with 13, I'd say 25 wins is pretty feasible at this point. Particularly if it's a tight race down the stretch, since he's a knuckleballer, I could see Collins using him on shorter rest a couple times to lock up one of the wild cards. And that's not even counting what the divisional possibilities could be if Washington really does stay true to their word and shuts Strasburg down.

Regardless, I was 4 when Doc won 24 and the Cy. This is pretty ****ing awesome.

Jesus man, calm down. I'm excited about R.A. too, but as EY always says, "numbers always regress to the mean." Also, "symbolic penis."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus man, calm down. I'm excited about R.A. too, but as EY always says, "numbers always regress to the mean." Also, "symbolic penis."

Wakefield had a similar first half in 95, needless to say, regression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus man, calm down. I'm excited about R.A. too, but as EY always says, "numbers always regress to the mean." Also, "symbolic penis."

I have no clue if this is serious or not, but if it is then I don't think you know what a mean is within the context of a regression equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no clue if this is serious or not, but if it is then I don't think you know what a mean is within the context of a regression equation.

I think you're just experiencing cognitive dissonance.

Also, I'm worried about you getting your hopes up for a player on your favorite sh*tty team. Personally, it worries me that so much of the Mets' success is dependent on a knuckleballer, which is such a volatile role to begin with. I don't expect him to win the Cy Young when all is said and done, and wouldn't be surprised if he ends up 4th or 5th in the running. Meanwhile, the Mets will end up around .500, not in the division or wild card running as you so hopefully suggest.

The fact that R.A. has 13 wins and Cliff Lee has 0 kind of sums up my argument here. Its too long of a season and we've been burned far too many times as Mets fans to let our hopes get this high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're just experiencing cognitive dissonance.

Oh shut up. If you want to argue I'm acting like a homer that's fine considering I started off the post with it. Dickey doesn't even have a mean to base the argument you're trying to make off of and hinting that statistical regression takes precedent regardless of indirect effects is not only stupid but outright clueless from an equation standpoint. Especially considering every factor that's gone into Dickey's season. I'm not bitonti, don't give me the 'you didn't think about what you said before you said it' treatment. You know me better than that. Regression doesn't happen in a vacuum with stochastic data; this isn't 'Nam, there are rules.

Also, I'm worried about you getting your hopes up for a player on your favorite sh*tty team. Personally, it worries me that so much of the Mets' success is dependent on a knuckleballer, which is such a volatile role to begin with. I don't expect him to win the Cy Young when all is said and done, and wouldn't be surprised if he ends up 4th or 5th in the running. Meanwhile, the Mets will end up around .500, not in the division or wild card running as you so hopefully suggest.

The fact that R.A. has 13 wins and Cliff Lee has 0 kind of sums up my argument here. Its too long of a season and we've been burned far too many times as Mets fans to let our hopes get this high.

Of course I'm getting my hopes up, I'm a ****ing fan and I like enjoying sports. If they crash I'll be cool with it not only because it certainly wouldn't be a first for me, but also because I had zero hopes for this season to begin with and I have a ton of faith in Sandy for the long run.

That said, the Lee and Wakefield references are so falsely equivalent from a syllogistic standpoint. Just stop it. None have anything to do with the other. You don't get to try to use the concept of correlation to support one thing and then just ignore it from another. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I just looked at his stats. Everyone knows it is an amazing year for him.

Just crazy that he is 11 games over .500 this year and that puts him at 2 over for his career. If that ever happened to a 37 year old pitcher before, I would be surprised.

Great story though, I am rooting for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Entirely plausible that he can keep going for another 7-8 years, like the Niekros, Charlie Hough, Wakefield-effective well into his 40s. A great story, and seems to be a good guy who's lived through some difficult times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entirely plausible that he can keep going for another 7-8 years, like the Niekros, Charlie Hough, Wakefield-effective well into his 40s. A great story, and seems to be a good guy who's lived through some difficult times.

Define effective. ;)

He had one 'decent' year in his last six (39yo to 44yo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Define effective. ;)

He had one 'decent' year in his last six (39yo to 44yo).

nd

Historically knuckleballers mature late and then milk out a solid career. Dickey is a sharp guy and stays in great shape. The money is a heck of an incentive. . There's no reason he canon be Tim Wakefield, if way more effective, for the better part of a decade.As awful ask Wakefileld may have been, he ate innings.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically knuckleballers mature late and then milk out a solid career. Dickey is a sharp guy and stays in great shape. The money is a heck of an incentive. . There's no reason he canon be Tim Wakefield, if way more effective, for the better part of a decade.As awful ask Wakefileld may have been, he ate innings.

Probably so...I doubt Wake ever approached 80 with his fastball much less his knuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I love the smell of regression in the morning.

Yeah so I was wrong. Not about the Mets coming back to earth but certainly about Dickey.

Dickey is now two wins shy in his attempt to become the Mets' first 20-game winner since Frank Viola in 1990. He is expected to get five more starts in September to try and attain that goal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Dickey for Cy Young!

I really hope they don't hand the award to Clayton Kershaw, Gio Gonzalez or Johnny Cueto. Cain and Bumgarner have been getting roughed up a bit lately so they seem to be out of the running.

At this point in the season, Dickey has won 18 of the Mets' 65 games (28 %). That's phenomenal. Here's how Dickey looks compared to the rest of MLB's pitchers in that category:

R.A. Dickey: 28 % (18/65)

Lucas Harrell: 24 % (10/42)

Jered Weaver: 22 % (16/74)

Gio Gonzalez: 21 % (18/84)

Cole Hamels: 21 % (14/66)

Jason Vargas: 21 % (14/67)

Yovani Gallardo: 21 % (14/67)

Wade Miley: 21 % (14/68)

AJ Burnett: 21 % (15/72)

Max Scherzer: 21 % (15/73)

Johnny Cueto: 20 % (17/83)

Chris Sale: 20 % (15/74)

Mark Beuhrle: 20 % (12/60)

Scott Diamond: 20 % (11/56)

Felix Hernandez: 19 % (13/67)

Kyle Lohse: 19 % (14/74)

Matt Harrison: 19 % (15/81)

Clayton Richard: 19 % (12/64)

Justin Verlander: 18 % (13/73)

Zack Greinke: 18 % (13/74)

Lance Lynn: 18 % (13/74)

Jake Westbrook: 18 % (13/74)

Madison Bumgarner: 18 % (14/77)

Stephen Strasburg: 18 % (15/84)

Adam Wainwright: 18 % (13/74)

Ian Kennedy: 18 % (12/68)

James Shields: 17 % (13/75)

Yu Darvish: 17 % (14/81)

Matt Cain: 17 % (13/77)

Tim Hudson: 17 % (13/77)

C.C. Sabathia: 17 % (13/77)

Hiroki Kuroda: 17 %: (13/77)

Phil Hughes: 17 % (13/77)

James McDonald: 17 % (12/72)

Clayton Kershaw: 16 % (12/73)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Dickey won hsi 20th this afternoon. In a sea of suckitude that is the Mets, he has done a remarkable job. Figure he gets rewarded by the WIlpons by first being lowballed on a contract, treated like day-old meat and then dealt for someone else's 5th and 8th best pitching prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dickey won hsi 20th this afternoon. In a sea of suckitude that is the Mets, he has done a remarkable job. Figure he gets rewarded by the WIlpons by first being lowballed on a contract, treated like day-old meat and then dealt for someone else's 5th and 8th best pitching prospects.

Yeah they have already said no interest in pursuing any of the FA outfielders and that they intend to fill the outfield via trades...lol.

Not sure who other than their pitching, Wright and Ike are attractive to anyone.

IMO they have to keep their pitching, Ike and Wright. Unless they make a FA splash next year will be a repeat of this one.

Congrats to Dickey though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...