Jump to content

Is Bollinger better then Pennington?


GlennFoley

Recommended Posts

whoa.. thats bold

well im a pretty big fan of bolly he does have a good arm his deep thows are just a beauty compared to those wobbly things that penny throws. his athleticism really helped the jets 6 sacks on him. if penny was there there would have been less thats because he would be injured. but penny wins brooks is 1-6 i think thats not so good, it all comes down to wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Bollinger better?

Than a healthy Chad Pennington: NO

Than a Chad Pennington with a torn rotator cuff: NO

Please Barton, tell me how Chad is better with a torn shoulder.

If CHad plays today, he's out by the 2nd quarter.

(btw, I nominate this for post of the week)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMAGINE CHAD behind that OL without BROOKS mobility, we would have lost by many more points! Put BROOKS behind an Ol that can pass block and we win! How much time diod the kid have? last year so many CHAD supporters cried about the great one not having enough time to throw accurately! Imagine hiom behind this OL! LOL WHEN WAS Sir CHADS last great game? Was it prior to getting killed in OAKLAND in 2002 or when? It will take awhile to figure out! LOL CHAD did show promise in 2002 in 5 very good games! What has he really shown since then that is way above average? [-X

And yet, he couldn't make the throws to win the game... go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMAGINE CHAD behind that OL without BROOKS mobility, we would have lost by many more points! Put BROOKS behind an Ol that can pass block and we win! How much time diod the kid have? last year so many CHAD supporters cried about the great one not having enough time to throw accurately! Imagine hiom behind this OL! LOL [-X

Ok... going out on a limb, I'd say Chad is probably a smarter QB than Brooks, and can read a defense. Then he'd go to his "hot" reads. And, the defense would probably respect Chad more, thus playing off more. And that would open up more room for Houston to run.

Though, I must say, it was nice to see receivers actually catch the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok... going out on a limb, I'd say Chad is probably a smarter QB than Brooks, and can read a defense. Then he'd go to his "hot" reads. And, the defense would probably respect Chad more, thus playing off more. And that would open up more room for Houston to run.

Though, I must say, it was nice to see receivers actually catch the ball.

DEFENSES do not respect a weak armed QB who has lost a lot of accuracy over the span of 3 years! especially one who is immobile! With more experience and a better OL BROOKS would be dynamite! Better WRs would help too! Got to love HOUSTON though! CHAD would be a great #3 if he restructures!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DEFENSES do not respect a weak armed QB who has lost a lot of accuracy over the span of 3 years! especially one who is immobile! With more experience and a better OL BROOKS would be dynamite! Better WRs would help too! Got to love HOUSTON though! CHAD would be a great #3 if he restructures!

A great number three? Holy crap... the entire Jet Nation has gone coocoo for cocca puffs. :shock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...