Bugg Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 Not saying I agree. the Jints have had the NFL allow everything from the schedule to the extra home game to get 1 NY team deep into the playoffs. The photo in the post does show that Barber's head-now bald-has physically changed. Yet, I remember that since Ken Caminiti was available and quotable that nobody looked the other way when he suddenly became an NL MVP candidate. It's easy to ask hard questions about a jerk like Bonds. When it's a nice guy like Barber, those questions might not come get asked at all. In fairness, there's always an element that hates anyone who's a success and looks to pull them down. I think Barber is having a great season and deserves a world of credit. But who really knows? http://thehaternation.blogspot.com/2005/12/from-desk-of-lil-hater_20.html Tuesday, December 20, 2005 From the Desk Of: Lil' Hater Someone Hand This Man a Cup To Pee In. The shelf life for running backs in the NFL is, at best, brief. The longevity of a runner listed at 5-foot-10, 200 pounds is, well, shorter. So how is it that [Tiki] Barber, in his ninth season at the age of 30, is getting better and better? -- Greg Garber ESPN.com, after Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 that comment about the NFL re-scheduling the game to the Meadowlands because of rain in Seattle is a ******* slap in the face of everybody who died in New Orleans does this douchbag not realize what the **** happened to the entire city? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 tiki would pass any test since the league doesn't test for HGH. It's very hard to detect since it uses chemicals similar to that produced by the pituitary. The bottom line here is that the entire NFL is on some sort of performance enhancing drug but no one talks about it. tiki isn't alone. You are telling me that OL who were 250 pounds in the 1970s are 350 pounds now and it's just due to better nutrition - yeah ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.