GlennFoley Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 PLEASE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Yeah, because our offense is so awesome, let's draft a ******* linebacker with a top five pick. I feel dumber after every GlennFoley post I read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 im not agreeing with him at ALL...b/c i think LB is the last position we need to use a 1st round pick on really once barton comes back...but in a way i see his logic...although i disagree with d'brick or trading down for more O-line help later in the draft. But our defense is a lot more serviceable than our offense....and its proven you can win with a GREAT defense...great offenses can lose...so why not build around vilma, barton, abe, and coleman(yes i know...but he'll be better next year, only a sophmore slump i promise)--cut the garbage on the defense, get some guys in the draft and FA...and try to be a defensive minded--smash mouth football team. And pray that a miracle happens within the right shoulder of penny lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 im not agreeing with him at ALL...b/c i think LB is the last position we need to use a 1st round pick on really once barton comes back...but in a way i see his logic...although i disagree with d'brick or trading down for more O-line help later in the draft. But our defense is a lot more serviceable than our offense....and its proven you can win with a GREAT defense...great offenses can lose...so why not build around vilma, barton, abe, and coleman(yes i know...but he'll be better next year, only a sophmore slump i promise)--cut the garbage on the defense, get some guys in the draft and FA...and try to be a defensive minded--smash mouth football team. And pray that a miracle happens within the right shoulder of penny lol Bingo.. Hawk is another Urlacher IMO... If you have a great defense you are going to make a run sooner or later.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 I would be all for drafting Hawk but then the JEts would need to trade D Fat and bring in a NT (which I would also like to see happen) then run a 3-4. It would be one helluva unit if it was Abe - Vilma - Hawk - Barton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 I would be all for drafting Hawk but then the JEts would need to trade D Fat and bring in a NT (which I would also like to see happen) then run a 3-4. It would be one helluva unit if it was Abe - Vilma - Hawk - Barton. Yea! Think about it.. After that we are just a Richard Seymour, Rodney Harrison, Ty Law, Tom Brady, and Bill Bellicheck away from a dynasty :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigJermaineFromQnz Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 I COMPLETELY AGREE. DRAFT AJ.HAWK!!! can you imagine how solid our LB unit would be with Hawk, Vilma, and Barton out there? He would be the most value for our draft pick. Lets face it, grabbing a QB will be another huge contract, a TERRIBLE, and i mean TERRIBLE QB controversy situation in which Chad and Fiedler will be involved. we can get a running back later if we even really need one. D-Brick i just dont know about... i'll have a HUGE smile on my face draft day if we grab hawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Yeah because this will drastically improve the offensive line problems the Jets are having. Trade the pick and address needs to fill the numerous holes the Jets have. This team is not one player away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.