Jump to content

3 Reasons Why Jets Might Not Cut Sanchez After All


flgreen

Recommended Posts

3 reasons why Jets might not cut Sanchez after all

By Brian CostelloMarch 18, 2014 | 2:40pm

 

 

 

Are these the final days of Mark Sanchez as a Jet?

 

The quarterback remains on the team’s roster despite the expectation for months that he would be released. But it is coming down to decision time for general manager John Idzik and the Jets.

 

Sanchez is due a $2 million roster bonus next Tuesday, which is believed to be the deadline to make a decision. No one around the NFL believes the Jets will pay that. There are some people who believe the Jets may try to get Sanchez to agree to a pay cut to stay with the team. Sanchez is due to make $11 million this year. Would he stay for $6 million?

 

If Sanchez is released, the Raiders and Texans reportedly have interest.

 

Sanchez was spotted by TMZ over the weekend, and he acknowledged the Jets decision-makers have a big one coming up.

 

Here are three reasons why it makes sense for the Jets to just let Sanchez go and three why they should keep him:

 

Cut him

 

1. It’s time to move on. The Jets and Sanchez looked like a nice marriage during his first two years, but it has soured over the past three. Just the sight of him draws boos from Jets fans, who seem to forget the two runs to the AFC title game and focus only on his turnovers. A fresh start may be what both sides need.

 

2. It’s time to see what Geno Smith can do. There is a sentiment inside the Jets organization that they need to just hand the job to Smith this year and let him play to figure out exactly what they have after an inconsistent rookie season. To get Sanchez to agree to a pay cut, they are going to have to promise him a chance at being a starter. What if Sanchez outplays Smith in training camp? Then you go back to Sanchez? It feels like a step back.

 

3. He deserves the chance to find a new team. The Jets already have hurt Sanchez’s market by waiting this out. This, of course, is the Idzik way: Never do anything until you have to. But Sanchez has had to sit and watch quarterbacks start to take jobs for which he might have been considered while he waits to be released. You can knock Sanchez as a player, but he has been a good employee. Sanchez never has criticized the team publicly and he’s had plenty of opportunities (think: Tebow, the shoulder injury). The team should do right by him and let him hit the open market sooner rather than later. If the Jets decide to pay the roster bonus and hold on to him, then cut him later this spring or summer, it severely hurts his chance to find a good deal.

 

Keep him

 

1. What’s the alternative? The free-agent quarterback market is unimpressive. If Sanchez is released today, he is probably the second-best quarterback on the market. Michael Vick might be an upgrade, but that is debatable. Vick is injury-prone and a turnover machine. Plus, he’ll be 34 this summer. Josh Freeman? Ryan Fitzpatrick? Shaun Hill? Are any of these guys better options than Sanchez?

 

2. Sanchez and Marty Mornhinweg really seemed to click last spring and summer. After the disastrous 2012 with Tony Sparano as his offensive coordinator, Sanchez seemed reinvigorated by Mornhinweg’s arrival and his West Coast offense. But we never got to see Sanchez actually play in it after he injured his shoulder during the preseason. Sanchez has shown he has talent when he has good wide receivers and a system that plays to his strength.

 

3. If the Jets are truly about “competition,” Sanchez could push Smith. The two had a good battle last summer with Smith leading early, injuring his ankle and then Sanchez taking the lead before hurting his shoulder. If the idea here is truly to find the best player to man the position, Sanchez could win the job. Now, some will argue Idzik won’t want that because he drafted Smith in the second round last year. It would be egg on his face if Sanchez beats out Smith. It is true he would face criticism, but if the Jets win, who cares? Does John Schneider, Idzik’s old boss in Seattle, get ripped for signing Matt Flynn to a $20 million deal a month before drafting Russell Wilson? No, because it worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't hate Mark Sanchez but if he stays get ready for more of the circus type atmosphere here to continue.

With beat writers like Mehta no matter what they do there will be a circus.  Might as well see who is the better QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with cam having surgery, you never know when a team will need sanchez

 

not saying they trade for him, just that you don't cut him until you have to

 

sanchez won't accept a pay cut, he will force the jets to cut him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not keep him - two options: Compete for the job and/or trade him. What if he shows well post surgery - the Jets have a decent backup to Smith if he fails or they trade him for a draft pick.

+1

They will keep him, showcase him in the preseason games to show that he is not damaged goods and then trade him before the 1st game. With preseason injuries, there is bound to be a team desperate for his services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you guys feel if Sanchez wasn't cut next week, comes to training camp, and out plays all qbs on roster including Geno?

 

Do we still all want Sanchez gone?

Do we still keep faith in Geno regardless of Sanchez's play?

Or do you hop on the Sanchise train one more time? 

 

I say, stick w Geno bc Sanchez will suck ass sooner or later(again) and by that time Geno"s self esteem is broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reasons for keeping Sanchez are all bullsh**.

 

1.  No alternative?  Of course there are alternatives.  There are always alternatives.  Ryan Fitzpatrick is a better alternative.  Shaun Hill is a better alternative.  Matt Schaub, when he's cut, is a FAR better alternative.  I'd also consider Josh Freeman, Matt Flynn, Kevin Kolb or Seneca Wallace.  All better alternatives than the turnover machine that is Sanchez.  Any of those 7 guys would be better suited to win a spot start than Mark Sanchez.

 

2.  Sanchez and Mornhinweg's "chemistry"?  Yeah, ok.  You mean that same kind of QB/OC chemistry that got Brian Schottenheimer and Tony Sparano fired?  Mornhinweg has been on record saying that Geno is his guy.  Sanchez can't also be his guy, too.

 

3.  Competition for Geno?  The time for that is over.  This is Geno's show.  Sanchez's presence will just be one giant distraction for the team and a great source of vitriol from the fan base.  I'd say the upside to Sanchez "pushing" Geno to get better is completely nonexistent.  If we want competition, Schaub or Fitzpatrick would be far better alternatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reasons for keeping Sanchez are all bullsh**.

1. No alternative? Of course there are alternatives. There are always alternatives. Ryan Fitzpatrick is a better alternative. Shaun Hill is a better alternative. Matt Schaub, when he's cut, is a FAR better alternative. I'd also consider Josh Freeman, Matt Flynn, Kevin Kolb or Seneca Wallace. All better alternatives than the turnover machine that is Sanchez. Any of those 7 guys would be better suited to win a spot start than Mark Sanchez.

2. Sanchez and Mornhinweg's "chemistry"? Yeah, ok. You mean that same kind of QB/OC chemistry that got Brian Schottenheimer and Tony Sparano fired? Mornhinweg has been on record saying that Geno is his guy. Sanchez can't also be his guy, too.

3. Competition for Geno? The time for that is over. This is Geno's show. Sanchez's presence will just be one giant distraction for the team and a great source of vitriol from the fan base. I'd say the upside to Sanchez "pushing" Geno to get better is completely nonexistent. If we want competition, Schaub or Fitzpatrick would be far better alternatives.

Flynn was available last year for league min and they passed.

Hill is not a better alternative. Neither are Wallace or Kolb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...