Jump to content

New York JETS are not that bad.


JetsFanInDenver
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would have loved a won but they did seem a lot better when the refs were not looking like they were out to take out the JETS.

 

Geno looked half way decent with having two targets on the field. His INT was a desperation play. Amaro showed he can decent target and even though he dropped a sitter he had 10 catches. Decker shows what happening a legit WR ont he field can do for a QB.

 

Lack of running game hurt us. Punt returning hurt us big time. Kyle WIlson was horrible.

 

The JETS are a WR, 2 CB's  and a punt returner away from being a good team.

 

I know its not what most JETS fans are looking for but i would still not be surprised if JETS end up 7-9, 8-8 this season.

 

I agree, there is some talent there. They are just a horribly coached football team, horribly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have loved a won but they did seem a lot better when the refs were not looking like they were out to take out the JETS.

 

Geno looked half way decent with having two targets on the field. His INT was a desperation play. Amaro showed he can decent target and even though he dropped a sitter he had 10 catches. Decker shows what happening a legit WR ont he field can do for a QB.

 

Lack of running game hurt us. Punt returning hurt us big time. Kyle WIlson was horrible.

 

The JETS are a WR, 2 CB's  and a punt returner away from being a good team.

 

I know its not what most JETS fans are looking for but i would still not be surprised if JETS end up 7-9, 8-8 this season.

 

 

actually the jets are a wr, cb, some o-linemen, a qb, a head coach, and an olb at least away from being a good team. in what world do you think punt returner is our problem? lol.

 

7-9 or 8-8? LMFHAO (laugh my mother****ing hairy ass off). we could possibly beat the titans but all the rest of the teams on our schedule are better than us. we might squeak out 2 wins. 3-13 is just about the best you could expect. I personally hope we don't win another game.

 

how much Prozac does it take to be this optimistic??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geno Smith is the worst QB in the league.

Their OL is mediocre at best.

Greg Salas is the big play receiving threat.

The best offensive player is a bruising big play RB who ran for 9 yards today

Walter Powell is the return man specialist.

They're starting a UDFA and a street FA they signed 2 weeks ago at corner.

They're 1-5 soon to be 1-6.

The Jets are a terrible Football team. One of the worst in the NFL.

Ok, but Idzik didn't overpay anyone. Doesn't that mean anything to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have loved a won but they did seem a lot better when the refs were not looking like they were out to take out the JETS.

 

Geno looked half way decent with having two targets on the field. His INT was a desperation play. Amaro showed he can decent target and even though he dropped a sitter he had 10 catches. Decker shows what happening a legit WR ont he field can do for a QB.

 

Lack of running game hurt us. Punt returning hurt us big time. Kyle WIlson was horrible.

 

The JETS are a WR, 2 CB's  and a punt returner away from being a good team.

 

I know its not what most JETS fans are looking for but i would still not be surprised if JETS end up 7-9, 8-8 this season.

Geno was not half way decent.  Denver was putting 9 freaking men in the box all day.  Challenging him to throw the football.  he has 0 pocket awareness.  Never steps up, and holds the ball forever.  He had several opportunities to make a play with his legs, and just didn't see  the plays.  He is not a good QB

 

Amaro had a very nice game.  Maybe he will develop into a decent TE.

 

Why was Wilson horrible?  he was 1-1 with Welker all game.  Think Welker had one catch.  Wilson had a good game.

 

One thing I'll say about the Jets today, they didn't quit.  They desperately need a QB who can make some plays.  Sadly he's not on the roster  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geno was not half way decent.  Denver was putting 9 freaking men in the box all day.  Challenging him to throw the football.  he has 0 pocket awareness.  Never steps up, and holds the ball forever.  He had several opportunities to make a play with his legs, and just didn't see  the plays.  He is not a good QB

 

Amaro had a very nice game.  Maybe he will develop into a decent TE.

 

Why was Wilson horrible?  he was 1-1 with Welker all game.  Think Welker had one catch.  Wilson had a good game.

 

One thing I'll say about the Jets today, they didn't quit.  They desperately need a QB who can make some plays.  Sadly he's not on the roster  

 

So the OL takes no blame.

 

I didnt say Geno was walking to Canton but he was solid.

 

Yeah allowing Welker 10 yard cushion when all he needed was 6 in the 4th quarter was someone playing great and with confidence. At best he held serve for the most part. Nothing spectacular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't they are the worst. and younger teams tend to get better as the season goes on. Lets see how they do in the next few months.

 

  What is this BS about young teams.  Every team is young in the NFL now.  The youngest team (Rams) is like 25 years old or something and the oldest is the Raiders at like 27.5 years avg age.    So the excuse that "young teams" will get better as the season goes on goes for every damn team in the NFL now, not just the Jets.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  What is this BS about young teams.  Every team is young in the NFL now.  The youngest team (Rams) is like 25 years old or something and the oldest is the Raiders at like 27.5 years avg age.    So the excuse that "young teams" will get better as the season goes on goes for every damn team in the NFL now, not just the Jets.   

Hahaha....you need to read this BS as well. Might enlighten you.

 

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/sports/eagles/Ranking-NFL-teams-by-age-Rams-youngest-team-in-the-NFL-Raiders-oldest.html

 

"The difference between the Rams and Raiders is only 1.91 years. Big whoop."

While 1.91 years may not be a big difference between two individual players, keep in mind that these are the average ages of 53 players per team.

1.91 years on average * 53 players = A difference of about 101 total years between the Rams and Raiders.

In other words, if you took the 20 oldest Raiders and shaved 5 years off each of their ages, their roster still wouldn't be as young as the Rams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the OL takes no blame.

 

I didnt say Geno was walking to Canton but he was solid.

 

Yeah allowing Welker 10 yard cushion when all he needed was 6 in the 4th quarter was someone playing great and with confidence. At best he held serve for the most part. Nothing spectacular.

The OL  is average.  Geno had time to throw today.  he just doesn't react well.  He runs in the wrong direction.  he is not a good QB.

 

Your going to pick on Wilson for one reception?  Welker is a guy who always kills the Jets.   One catch.

 

I admire your attempt to be a Sunshiner, I frequently play that role.  Just can't do it with this QB.  He sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OL  is average.  Geno had time to throw today.  he just doesn't react well.  He runs in the wrong direction.  he is not a good QB.

 

Your going to pick on Wilson for one reception?  Welker is a guy who always kills the Jets.   One catch.

 

I admire your attempt to be a Sunshiner, I frequently play that role.  Just can't do it with this QB.  He sucks

 

That one reception pretty much closed the game out for the Broncos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have loved a won but they did seem a lot better when the refs were not looking like they were out to take out the JETS.

 

Geno looked half way decent with having two targets on the field. His INT was a desperation play. Amaro showed he can decent target and even though he dropped a sitter he had 10 catches. Decker shows what happening a legit WR ont he field can do for a QB.

 

Lack of running game hurt us. Punt returning hurt us big time. Kyle WIlson was horrible.

 

The JETS are a WR, 2 CB's  and a punt returner away from being a good team.

 

I know its not what most JETS fans are looking for but i would still not be surprised if JETS end up 7-9, 8-8 this season.

 

So ... pot's legal in Colorado, huh?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha....you need to read this BS as well. Might enlighten you.

 

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/sports/eagles/Ranking-NFL-teams-by-age-Rams-youngest-team-in-the-NFL-Raiders-oldest.html

 

"The difference between the Rams and Raiders is only 1.91 years. Big whoop."

While 1.91 years may not be a big difference between two individual players, keep in mind that these are the average ages of 53 players per team.

1.91 years on average * 53 players = A difference of about 101 total years between the Rams and Raiders.

In other words, if you took the 20 oldest Raiders and shaved 5 years off each of their ages, their roster still wouldn't be as young as the Rams.

 

  it is BS because the Patriots and Broncos are both younger than the Jets and yet still have QBs close to 40 years old.   The Chargers and Colts are close to the Raiders in age and yet have QBs that are battling for the MVP. And the Chargers QB isn't young either.

And the Rams and Jags are the youngest teams in the NFL and stink while the Raiders are the oldest and still stink.  

 

 So yeah the Jets "youth" will get better as the season goes on, but somehow the Broncos, Pats, Chiefs, Browns, Bills, etc won't?  All those teams are younger than the Jets.

 

 The BS is the fact that age doesn't make a team win or lose, it's the players on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People forget the ONE lonely win this year is from the worst team in football the OAKLAND RAIDERS.

Even though they gave the Chargers a good run for their money today losing at the end 31-28.

WE only created 2 turnovers on Defense all year. Remarkable stat. The Missed INT by Kyle Wilson was notreally his fault. He turn suddenly into the ball and it jumped right on him.

Jets lose by 30 on Thursday? Great possibility.

1-15 baby!!!!!! Go for it!!

SUCK FOR LUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oops. Wrong year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  it is BS because the Patriots and Broncos are both younger than the Jets and yet still have QBs close to 40 years old.   The Chargers and Colts are close to the Raiders in age and yet have QBs that are battling for the MVP. And the Chargers QB isn't young either.

And the Rams and Jags are the youngest teams in the NFL and stink while the Raiders are the oldest and still stink.  

 

 So yeah the Jets "youth" will get better as the season goes on, but somehow the Broncos, Pats, Chiefs, Browns, Bills, etc won't?  All those teams are younger than the Jets.

 

 The BS is the fact that age doesn't make a team win or lose, it's the players on the team.

 

I am not a Broncos or Colts or Chargers fan. Those teams could drive themselves of the edge of a cliff and I wont care. I am JETS fan. I know its a young team. And I know as the season goes on it will get better. That's all i focus on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...