Beerfish Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 The NFL being the big copy cat league goes through these cycles and a lot of fans buy into it as well. A team wins the big one and then that is the big formula to winning it all. last year the Seahawks win it and people swear up and down that great D and ground and pound is the way to go and they proceed to site the Bears, Ravens etc. The fact that they crushed the juggernaught Broncos was proof positive to this. I've always dismissed these rather one sided 'formulas' for winning it all. In my opinion you have to be really good at what you have chosen to make your team. The Pats with their short passing game. Create turnovers on D. Each time a new coach or management team comes on board they seem to want to totally deviate from the teams past and thus spend a few years just rolling over personell. You need to do one thing really really well and just be competent in other phases. You for sure need an eye to have good depth on your team. In alot of super bowls some no name 3rd stringer comes up with the plays that make the difference. (The reason we lost to Indy in the AFC title game a few years back was simply because their 3rd best receiver killed our 3rd best cover guy.) One thing I will say that the much hated Idzik had right in his comments was building for 'sustained success'. That is how you win multiple super bowls. It's really hard to win 2 in a row or 2 out of 3 but if you are like the Pats and always in the playoffs and always contending you will win your share. What say you all? What is your magic formula? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaJet Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Short 2-5 yard passes for 60 mins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Well I think first of all, Robert Kraft must buy your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 That has been the formula for about ten years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 What is your magic formula? Draft a HOF QB in the 6th round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Draft a HOF QB in the 6th round. I think you can say GOAT now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I think you can say GOAT now You can say best of his era. But best of all time? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 long handoffs, crossing routes, repeat they have been doing this for years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 You can say best of his era. But best of all time? No. who better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 who better? Everyone has their own opinion. For me it's between Brady and Montana. Can't go wrong either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 who better? I would like to see Joe Montana's numbers had he played with this era's rules. Or Johnny Unitas. Or Dan Marino (whom I hate as much as Brady. ) It's really hard to compare QBs across generations. Can you imagine Namath playing in this era, where breathing on the QB draws a penalty and receivers can't be anally raped like they could in the 1960s? Montana was 4-0 in SBs and never threw a pick and beat two Hall of Famers in his and a third guy who belongs in the Hall in Ken Anderson and he played circles around them in those games. For all his accomplishments they threw out a stat in the first quarter last night that blew me away. Tom Brady is 1 for 22 on passes that travel 20 yards or more in Super Bowl play. Wilson completed at least four last night alone. I don't know what historical significance that has but it seems to me that the best of all time would be able to connect on more than one deep ball in six Super Bowl games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Everyone has their own opinion. For me it's between Brady and Montana. Can't go wrong either way. Montana actually had a good innovative coach Brady is saddled with career loser Belicheat Belicheat - (Brady+Cheating+Bevell) = Kotite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Tom Brady > Peyton Manning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I would like to see Joe Montana's numbers had he played with this era's rules. Or Johnny Unitas. Or Dan Marino (whom I hate as much as Brady. ) It's really hard to compare QBs across generations. Can you imagine Namath playing in this era, where breathing on the QB draws a penalty and receivers can't be anally raped like they could in the 1960s? Montana was 4-0 in SBs and never threw a pick and beat two Hall of Famers in his and a third guy who belongs in the Hall in Ken Anderson and he played circles around them in those games. For all his accomplishments they threw out a stat in the first quarter last night that blew me away. Tom Brady is 1 for 22 on passes that travel 20 yards or more in Super Bowl play. Wilson completed at least four last night alone. I don't know what historical significance that has but it seems to me that the best of all time would be able to connect on more than one deep ball in six Super Bowl games. I was going to mention Marino but I just couldn't. Hate that mother f'er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I would like to see Joe Montana's numbers had he played with this era's rules. Or Johnny Unitas. Or Dan Marino (whom I hate as much as Brady. ) It's really hard to compare QBs across generations. Can you imagine Namath playing in this era, where breathing on the QB draws a penalty and receivers can't be anally raped like they could in the 1960s? Montana was 4-0 in SBs and never threw a pick and beat two Hall of Famers in his and a third guy who belongs in the Hall in Ken Anderson and he played circles around them in those games. For all his accomplishments they threw out a stat in the first quarter last night that blew me away. Tom Brady is 1 for 22 on passes that travel 20 yards or more in Super Bowl play. Wilson completed at least four last night alone. I don't know what historical significance that has but it seems to me that the best of all time would be able to connect on more than one deep ball in six Super Bowl games. Montana was on loaded teams with an all time great at WR1 and they were running an innovative offense (for the time), the fact that there was no drop off going to young really says something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 There is no winning formula to championships. There is players who buy into the system, know their job, and execute when its time for them to execute. And coaches who know how to best use the personnel they have, teach the players what they need to know to be prepared for anything that can happen. Patriots are consistently good because they are the best prepared team week in and week out. They know what they have to do, and most of the time get it done. They dont accept mediocrity. They arent afraid to make changes when necessary. And having a few talented players doesnt hurt either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 The formula doesn't matter, the QB does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Montana was on loaded teams with an all time great at WR1 and they were running an innovative offense (for the time), the fact that there was no drop off going to young really says something Everybody forgets that Montana's first two Super Bowl wins came before anyone ever heard Jerry Rice's name. There was a drop off. They had just won back to back SBs and came damn close to going to a third straight and it took Young five years (longer than any of Montana's SB droughts) to finally go back and win one and he too was a Hall of Famer. It not like he passed the torch to Todd Blackledge and they continued to have the same success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 The formula doesn't matter, the QB does. And luck. Lots of luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I don't know what historical significance that has but it seems to me that the best of all time would be able to connect on more than one deep ball in six Super Bowl games. What kind of trophy do you win by completing a pass of over 20 yards? No other QB in the history of the Super Bowl has more wins, completions, TD passes and yards thrown than Brady. BTW, did you like his 20+yard pass to Gronk for a perfectly thrown TD pass last night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Everybody forgets that Montana's first two Super Bowl wins came before anyone ever heard Jerry Rice's name. There was a drop off. They had just won back to back SBs and came damn close to going to a third straight and it took Young five years (longer than any of Montana's SB droughts) to finally go back and win one and he too was a Hall of Famer. It not like he passed the torch to Todd Blackledge and they continued to have the same success. well now you are grading it on SB's a team accomplishment.. and brady's been to 6, whereas young was facing off with loaded cowboy teams When I said drop off, I meant individual statistics, and there was none. In fact, young was superior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Montana was on loaded teams with an all time great at WR1 and they were running an innovative offense (for the time), the fact that there was no drop off going to young really says something And if you're going to beat up Montana for winning two SBs with Jerry Rice, what is Brady's excuse for NOT winning any SBs with Randy Moss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 And if you're going to beat up Montana for winning two SBs with Jerry Rice, what is Brady's excuse for NOT winning any SBs with Randy Moss? They play that game 10 times and the giants win 1 of them, any given sunday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 well now you are grading it on SB's a team accomplishment.. and brady's been to 6, whereas young was facing off with loaded cowboy teams When I said drop off, I meant individual statistics, and there was none. In fact, young was superior Dude, I said Brady is the best of his era. You're a Jets fan. Stop acting like a ******* troll for once in your life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 They play that game 10 times and the giants win 1 of them, any given sunday Actually they played it twice and the Giants won them both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 You can only have sustained success in this league with a franchise QB. Get one and you'll have shots at Super Bowl runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 2, 2015 Author Share Posted February 2, 2015 There is no winning formula to championships. There is players who buy into the system, know their job, and execute when its time for them to execute. And coaches who know how to best use the personnel they have, teach the players what they need to know to be prepared for anything that can happen. Patriots are consistently good because they are the best prepared team week in and week out. They know what they have to do, and most of the time get it done. They dont accept mediocrity. They arent afraid to make changes when necessary. And having a few talented players doesnt hurt either. Agreed. A lot of fans and yes teams themselves buy into the winning formula by emulating the last team to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Actually they played it twice and the Giants won them both. Not with Randy Moss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 the formula is cheating and buying off the refs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Dude, I said Brady is the best of his era. You're a Jets fan. Stop acting like a ******* troll for once in your life. He's the GOAT, sorry it gets your oversized bloomers in a bunch.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I think for me in my lifetime it's, 1. Montana 2. Brady 3. Elway 4. Manning 5. Marino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 He's the GOAT, sorry it gets your oversized bloomers in a bunch.. Yeah. He's not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJ37/12 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I think you can say GOAT now The hell you can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJ37/12 Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 He's the GOAT, sorry it gets your oversized bloomers in a bunch.. Not even close. Brady lasts maybe five years in the NFL I grew up with. Could you imagine the yards Marino would have had with these rules? How many more titles for Montana? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Lol. Brady goat. Elway and Marino with the rules of today would go crazy. Like 7000 yards crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.