Beerfish Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. If this ever came to real litigation in a court of law with people required to testify under oath you would get your answers. In the meantime Roger Goodell and the NFL set a precedent in the New Orleans ruling that cannot be over looked so even if you and the pat brethren cling to that last string of hope you are still going to get slapped by the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Remember when Brady said he didn't know anything about this? In a press conference with that smirk and punchable face... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghost_in_pads02 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 old Jets insider forums have been so overly generous to pats fans who behave like asses and troll borders on silly. Go to a pats fan site, say one wrong word about the team and your but is banned in seconds What is above is untrue. I been on both boards and jets insider would ban opposing fans in a min. If its members just didnt want you there. And i been on pats boards n seen jets fans get a fair shake. Here for me, and i have said this numerous times. Has been nothing but respectable n fair to all its users. Its one of the best sites out. I Respect the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. LOL. You might want to put some clothes on before you parade around your nonsense while stark naked. Pats are cheaters in every respect. Brady is a lying scumbag. * * * * Have a nice day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. I feel bad for you. You are a good fan. You deserve better than this. You are welcome to come be a fan of the Jets. I just checked. "JetsFan Tx" is still available. Give me the word and it's done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Those text messages holy cow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 What is above is untrue. I been on both boards and jets insider would ban opposing fans in a min. If its members just didnt want you there. And i been on pats boards n seen jets fans get a fair shake. Here for me, and i have said this numerous times. Has been nothing but respectable n fair to all its users. Its one of the best sites out. I Respect the site. 100% totally incorrect. Have been on? I was on jets insider for about 5 years and the same lame ass trolls were allowed to dip into each thread and toss in their obvious comments. Once a year one would get suspended for a week maybe. This forum us exactly the same. If this forum was like a pats forum you certainly wpuld not be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Well, this thread isn't going predictably at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 What is above is untrue. I been on both boards and jets insider would ban opposing fans in a min. If its members just didnt want you there. And i been on pats boards n seen jets fans get a fair shake. Here for me, and i have said this numerous times. Has been nothing but respectable n fair to all its users. Its one of the best sites out. I Respect the site. Thank you. We do try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Well, this thread isn't going predictably at all. This is catnip to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphtrilogy Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Those text messages holy cow they seem so fake to be true, unreal... wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComfortablyNumb Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. This is not a homicide investigation you clueless homer. The amount of circumstantial evidence on Brady alone is ridiculous. You have to be one serious homer with his head buried in the sand not to see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 they seem so fake to be true, unreal... wow What makes them seem fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 From page 18 of the report, this certainly appears to be Brady orchestrating a cover up: Additional evidence of Brady‟s awareness includes a material increase in the frequency of telephone and text communications between Brady and Jastremski shortly after suspicions of ball tampering became public on January 19. After not communicating by telephone or text message for more than six months (based on data retrieved from Jastremski‟s cell phone), Brady and Jastremski spoke by telephone at least twice on January 19 (calls lasting a total of 25 minutes and 2 seconds), twice on January 20 (calls lasting a total of 9 minutes and 55 seconds) and twice on January 21 (calls lasting a total of 20 minutes and 52 seconds) before Jastremski surrendered his cell phone to the Patriots later that day for forensic imaging. These calls included conversations relatively early during the mornings of January 19 (7:26 a.m. for 13 minutes and 4 seconds), January 20 (8:22 a.m. for 6 minutes and 21 seconds) and January 21 (7:38 a.m. for 13 minutes and 47 seconds). Brady also took the unprecedented step of inviting Jastremski to the QB room (essentially Brady‟s office) in Gillette Stadium on January 19 for the first and only time that Jastremski can recall during his twenty-year career with the Patriots, and Brady sent Jastremski text messages seemingly designed to calm Jastremski (“You good Jonny boy?”; “You doing good?”). For his part, Jastremski sent Brady text messages confirming that he was okay (“Still nervous; so far so good though”) and cautioning Brady about questioning (“FYI...Dave will be picking your brain later about it. He‟s not accusing me, or anyone...trying to get to bottom of it. He knows it‟s unrealistic you did it yourself...”). Wow, Brady is not only a cheater, but stupid too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 This is not a homicide investigation you clueless homer. The amount of circumstantial evidence on Brady alone is ridiculous. You have to be one serious homer with his head buried in the sand not to see that. Go easy on him. It's not easy for a man of his age to continue to spin as long as he has. An now with this extensive report, which is tantamount to a guilty verdict against the Pats and Tom Brady, he has to take spinning to another level. Hope he doesn't have a coronary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjets782 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. Except for all the texts between your team's employees. McNally did not say he "could be" the "deflator" or "probably was" the "deflator"... he IS the "deflator". You mad, bro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphtrilogy Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 What makes them seem fake? not fake, just outrageous. I mean the way TB is portrayed right? its almost too juicy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 This thread has vastly improved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghost_in_pads02 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 100% totally incorrect. Have been on? I was on jets insider for about 5 years and the same lame ass trolls were allowed to dip into each thread and toss in their obvious comments. Once a year one would get suspended for a week maybe. This forum us exactly the same. If this forum was like a pats forum you certainly wpuld not be here. I physically seen it with jet insider and the patriots rendition to scout.com I seen some pats posters on insider get banned just cause jet fans didnt like the poster. On the pats version of scout..i seen a pats poster n a jet poster get into it and the moderator just told both of them to chill out. No one was banned. And the mod asked everyone to treat each other w respect. Similar to what i have seen moderators do here. I dont have any reason to lie. its the Internet. i dont take none of this seriously. So no need to lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Except for all the texts between your team's employees. McNally did not say he "could be" the "deflator" or "probably was" the "deflator"... he IS the "deflator". You mad, bro? I don't think mad begins to describe it. Pats fans thought they'd witnessed that elusive legitimate championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Guilt has clearly been established as well as a franchise wide attempt at a cover-up.... Only question now is what will be penalties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 not fake, just outrageous. I mean the way TB is portrayed right? its almost too juicy Its hardly surprising. I've always thought he was an entitled dickhead. This just proves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Guilt has clearly been established as well as a franchise wide attempt at a cover-up.... Only question now is what will be penalties? 7th rounder next year, then award Pats an extra 6th rd comp pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghost_in_pads02 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Guilt has clearly been established as well as a franchise wide attempt at a cover-up.... Only question now is what will be penalties? Franchise wide!? Really? You got text messages from a equipment manager n probably the QB and that means the whole franchise was in on it? Emmm..ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 7th rounder next year, then award Pats an extra 6th rd comp pick. Honestly that report is pretty damning. I think the penalties are going to be relatively strong. My guess is both Brady and BB get suspensions (short ones but suspensions nonetheless) and at least a 3rd rounder. With that report those have to be the minimums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Franchise wide!? Really? You got text messages from a equipment manager n probably the QB and that means the whole franchise was in on it? Emmm..ok. Goodell set the precedent in the Saints Bountygate case. Ignorance is not an excuse. If one member of the organization is guilty, the whole organization is guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Franchise wide!? Really? You got text messages from a equipment manager n probably the QB and that means the whole franchise was in on it? Emmm..ok. before Jastremski surrendered his cell phone to the Patriots later that day for forensic imaging Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Guilt has clearly been established as well as a franchise wide attempt at a cover-up.... Only question now is what will be penalties? An extra spank from Goodell during buttsex with Kraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Goodell set the precedent in the Saints Bountygate case. Ignorance is not an excuse. If one member of the organization is guilty, the whole organization is guilty. Yeah but thats the Saints. Not his darling team with his boo owner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRL Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Continuous history of getting caught cheating should be factored into NE penalty. Brady should get suspended for a couple of games in addition to a huge fine and losing their 2016 #1 pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetster Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Well, well. I guess NOBODIES going to be apologizing to Mr. Kraft, LMAO! So now take your stupid 80s dress shirts & GTFOH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Goodell set the precedent in the Saints Bountygate case. Ignorance is not an excuse. If one member of the organization is guilty, the whole organization is guilty. ^^ Not buying it. One set of rules for the league and another set for the Pats. You watch. Penalties will be very mild. Wish it wasn't true but Goodell is Krafts bitch. Only reason anything came out is because they brought in an independent to investigate. If Goodell did the investigation the result would have been an apology to Kraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 An extra spank from Goodell during buttsex with Kraft. Candle wax! Use the candle wax! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yea, damning evidence consists of alot of "possibly, probably, maybe, and could be's". Not one bit of concrete evidence whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.