Popular Post operaguy Posted May 2, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted May 2, 2015 Just dumb. What is Smith's ceiling? Let's be kind and say slightly better than Decker. Now a lot of people say trade Decker for a 2nd. Okay, let's say that can be done, we trade in and get who? Someone who was available at 37, and options are more limited than what they would be if we picked at 37 since players are coming off the board. Different Scenario you keep Smith and Decker. You run a spread? What do you do with Kerley? How much better is this receiving core than our West Coast Offense? Still yet to be seen if that would work out with Decker, Marshall, Smith, and Kerley, who are all basically wide receivers. Plus two years down the road let's say you re-sign Decker. You then have to pay Amaro, and then you have to Smith. Only way this trade makes sense, is if you swing Decker and some pick for Rivers. If that happens, I'll shut up and celebrate. But, I'll believe that when I see it. You obviously can't blindly pick by need in the draft, but this notion that you have to take the best player available no matter what isn't right either, as proven by this pick. 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I support this message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I understand the pick, just don't agree with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adb280z Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Just dumb. What is Smith's ceiling? Let's be kind and say slightly better than Decker. Now a lot of people say trade Decker for a 2nd. Okay, let's say that can be done, we trade in and get who? Someone who was available at 37, and options are more limited than what they would be if we picked at 37 since players are coming off the board. Different Scenario you keep Smith and Decker. You run a spread? What do you do with Kerley? How much better is this receiving core than our West Coast Offense? Still yet to be seen if that would work out with Decker, Marshall, Smith, and Kerley, who are all basically wide receivers. Plus two years down the road let's say you re-sign Decker. You then have to pay Amaro, and then you have to Smith. Only way this trade makes sense, is if you swing Decker and some pick for Rivers. If that happens, I'll shut up and celebrate. But, I'll believe that when I see it. You obviously can't blindly pick by need in the draft, but this notion that you have to take the best player available no matter what isn't right either, as proven by this pick. Who cares about Kerley, he's JAG. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Just dumb. What is Smith's ceiling? Let's be kind and say slightly better than Decker. Now a lot of people say trade Decker for a 2nd. Okay, let's say that can be done, we trade in and get who? Someone who was available at 37, and options are more limited than what they would be if we picked at 37 since players are coming off the board. Different Scenario you keep Smith and Decker. You run a spread? What do you do with Kerley? How much better is this receiving core than our West Coast Offense? Still yet to be seen if that would work out with Decker, Marshall, Smith, and Kerley, who are all basically wide receivers. Plus two years down the road let's say you re-sign Decker. You then have to pay Amaro, and then you have to Smith. Only way this trade makes sense, is if you swing Decker and some pick for Rivers. If that happens, I'll shut up and celebrate. But, I'll believe that when I see it. You obviously can't blindly pick by need in the draft, but this notion that you have to take the best player available no matter what isn't right either, as proven by this pick. lol 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 LOL...well done 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shuler82 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 slow golf clap 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I don't get this post at all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Oh I think I get it now, and see what you did there, I hope. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
operaguy Posted May 2, 2015 Author Share Posted May 2, 2015 No one is trading Decker. He's an excellent #2, his salary makes sense. Smith is the exact type of guy we don't have in our WR corps. Fills it out perfectly. Stop crying Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Problem is Devin Smith isn't Desean Jackson, he's at best Marquis Lee and you're talking about getting rid of Decker with this pick so lateral move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
operaguy Posted May 2, 2015 Author Share Posted May 2, 2015 Who cares about Kerley, he's JAG. Our Offense doesn't get better when you get rid of Kerley, I'll say again Lateral. Move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Who cares about Kerley, he's JAG. Thank you for presenting the harsh truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 what can I say I just really wanted more defense 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Problem is Devin Smith isn't Desean Jackson, he's at best Marquis Lee and you're talking about getting rid of Decker with this pick so lateral move. Marqise Lee is my comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keysersoze Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Thank you for presenting the harsh truth. LOL bullsh*t. Kerley is NOT a JAG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxman Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 hee hee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aec4 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 LOL bullsh*t. Kerley is NOT a JAG. You are right, that's an insult to JAGs everywhere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 LOL bullsh*t. Kerley is NOT a JAG. Then what is he? You're telling me that Kerley isnt easily replaceable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shuler82 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Then what is he? You're telling me that Kerley isnt easily replaceable? you think 5th round picks grow on trees?!?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRL Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 What nonsense, shut up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 you think 5th round picks grow on trees?!?!? lol That totally answers my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetBlue Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 THIS ENTIRE POST IS Just dumb. What is Smith's ceiling? Let's be kind and say slightly better than Decker. Now a lot of people say trade Decker for a 2nd. Okay, let's say that can be done, we trade in and get who? Someone who was available at 37, and options are more limited than what they would be if we picked at 37 since players are coming off the board. Different Scenario you keep Smith and Decker. You run a spread? What do you do with Kerley? How much better is this receiving core than our West Coast Offense? Still yet to be seen if that would work out with Decker, Marshall, Smith, and Kerley, who are all basically wide receivers. Plus two years down the road let's say you re-sign Decker. You then have to pay Amaro, and then you have to Smith. Only way this trade makes sense, is if you swing Decker and some pick for Rivers. If that happens, I'll shut up and celebrate. But, I'll believe that when I see it. You obviously can't blindly pick by need in the draft, but this notion that you have to take the best player available no matter what isn't right either, as proven by this pick. FIXED. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooklynJetFan Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Lol very well played sir. I think. I hope, anyhow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Would have preferred DGB but you have to give Smith a shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
predator_05 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 some of you need to pay closer attention 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Mostro Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 WHOS TALKING ABOUT GETTING RID OF DECKER????? It makes no sense. Smith is an addition to a much improved WR group. That's all. No reason Marshall, Decker or Kerley have to be moved. He's the perfect fit becuase he is totally different than the 3 aforementioned players. Now our group is dynamic. Slight upgrade from Hill, Ford, Salas and Nelson LMAO! Read this yobo's other posts and you will quickly find that there is no "there" there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 This thread delivers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LouisvilleSlugger25 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Lol very well played sir. I think. I hope, anyhow. This. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Lol very well played sir. I think. I hope, anyhow. Seems a fair few folks not in on the joke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 some of you need to pay closer attention This 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Has very good game speed, hand eye coordination doesn't get lost in plays, good hands. Yeah I wanted DGB but we needed a receiver and I can't see anything bad about him. He is way faster than marquise lee what ru guys talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooklynJetFan Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 It's a mock thread taking a shot at the thread started about Williams after he was taken. Very well done, if I may add. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I don't get how some people don't get this thread at all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I don't get how some people don't get this thread at all. Oh, I can COMPLETELY get why some people don't get it at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Problem is Devin Smith isn't Desean Jackson, he's at best Marquis Lee and you're talking about getting rid of Decker with this pick so lateral move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.