HessStation Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 To me 75 will always be Winston Hill.. Wasn't Bruce Smith 75? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 Wasn't Bruce Smith 75? No I think he was 78?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 No I think he was 78?? Correct, good call!That's a weird number too. I think the 90's always looks better on DL but really, who cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I don't like the 62 on him but if he plays like he's supposed to, I couldn't careless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southparkcpa Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I don't like the 62 on him but if he plays like he's supposed to, I couldn't careless. VLAD has IMO ruined that number....... We need a 5 years rest on 62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Third Down Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 He had 62 at practice. That's an O-lineman number! He needs to get 99, or better still, 00. That's what QBs will be seeing after he hits them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted May 10, 2015 Share Posted May 10, 2015 62? Caman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet9 Posted May 10, 2015 Share Posted May 10, 2015 Maybe he sets a new trend. NHL rosters are full of jersey numbers that were considered 99% obnoxious/ridiculous to wear about 10 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.