deucebag Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 Seeing how poorly Cleveland and Indy have performed this year, yes perhaps the two wins we have earned were flukes. Fitz is a terrible QB, he is a shorter/weaker armed Boomer Essiason. He hasn't made as many outright dumb plays as we would expect from Geno...but let me put it this way - Geno's highs are higher than Fitz, but his lows are lower - so why should Geno start - Because the threat for a deep ball is greater with Geno in - therefore it takes a defender out of the box giving the rb's (and geno for that matter) a better shot at running the ball. I think we have seen enough to tell us - with Fitz at QB - we will get destroyed by the teams with better defenses. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 Not totally certain, but i think this may have been covered in one of the 47 Fitz/Geno threads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 Sorry boys he's starting next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 Boomer Esiason had the lead in the super bowl against Montana with 30 seconds left They would have won if Krumrie didn't break his leg. Wyche likes to blame Stanley Wilson's coke habit, but it was watching first time all-pro Krumrie's leg snap that was the killer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.