Jump to content

Enough on not going for the FGs, I think not going for 2 down 22-9 was bigger


aec4

Recommended Posts

so based on this you would gain 25 points in 333 years ?

1000 TD's = 25 points gained

teams score on average 30 TD's a year

1000 TD's / 30 = 333 years

you can see why coaches don't do it I guess

even if you move the XP to 90% rate for the new rules, its 74 points gained  and then its 74 points gained in 333 years

I suck at math so I'm probably wrong but I think if it's that close you can't use the %ages to make your case for any specific game and teams just don't score enough TD's for such a small difference to make a radical change in strategery

Pittsburgh goes for 2 arbitrarily.  I think you'll start seeing more do it especially those with top notch offenses 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...