Popular Post RutgersJetFan Posted December 27, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted December 27, 2015 Per post-game right now. It wasn't Slater. Makes it all the more delicious. Such an arrogant clown. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RutgersJetFan Posted December 27, 2015 Author Popular Post Share Posted December 27, 2015 And of course, New England post-game is defending the decision as brilliant coaching as well. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Per post-game right now. It wasn't Slater. Makes it all the more delicious. Such an arrogant clown. If that's the case, then Slater's screw up was saying kick, as opposed to choosing the direction. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesr Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 And of course, New England post-game is defending the decision as brilliant coaching as well. Well, what dumbass would put the ball in Tom Brady's hands with the game on the line??? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyjet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 dumb, just dumb. Thanks tho 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUM-KNEE Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Per post-game right now. It wasn't Slater. Makes it all the more delicious. Such an arrogant clown. Same ol Rats 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYs Stepchild Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 (edited) Per post-game right now. It wasn't Slater. Makes it all the more delicious. Such an arrogant clown. It was obvious. The clowns we have as announcers have no clue. They were upset because they thought they got to choose the direction if they deffer but they didn't deffer they chose He said we want to kick that way. Edited December 27, 2015 by NYs Stepchild 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Why was Slater so animated then? It wasn't what Belicheck wanted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted December 27, 2015 Author Share Posted December 27, 2015 Well, what dumbass would put the ball in Tom Brady's hands with the game on the line??? You have got Tom Brady and are facing a guy that has been absolute money on game-winning drives the past month. So yeah, let's keep the ball out of the latter and put it in the hands of the former. Love it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Haha. Bellicheat is such an arrogant tool. Why in the world would anybody elect to kick in OT when a TD wins the game? How can this decision be defended? What a fool. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Curious how many holding calls on Pats today? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesr Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Haha. Bellicheat is such an arrogant tool. Why in the world would anybody elect to kick in OT when a TD wins the game? How can this decision be defended? What a fool. He clearly trusted his defense to get the stop. Fitz had other ideas. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesr Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Curious how many holding calls on Pats today? About as many as they had victories. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Genuinely think he's just protecting him. Slater was visibly confused, you could almost see him realise that he f*cked up. I'll take it either way. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYs Stepchild Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 He clearly trusted his defense to get the stop. Fitz had other ideas. He expected us to play safe for a field goal if we did move the ball. He didn't expect us to go for the kill. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 I thought the dumber decision was going for it on 4th and a few down 4 points inside the 40. I didn't know the wind conditions, but their kicker should make more times than they get the first. They got a big play, and eventually scored the TD, so it is of course the better decision in hind sight. Kick in overtime, get a stop, and give them momentum and field position. Especially since the pats offense was stifled today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Curious how many holding calls penalties on Pats today? Fixed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJ Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 The Coin Toss Fumble 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted December 27, 2015 Author Share Posted December 27, 2015 Genuinely think he's just protecting him. Slater was visibly confused, you could almost see him realise that he f*cked up. I'll take it either way. There's a clip of him talking in detail to them before the flip. For much longer than it seems a coach would have to if you're reminding your players you're receiving. Makes it believable when you see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Genuinely think he's just protecting him. Slater was visibly confused, you could almost see him realise that he f*cked up. I'll take it either way. i think the confusion was over choosing the direction of the kick. he thought they got to choose, but the winner chooses kick or receive and the loser chooses direction i guess 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Couldn't stop a nose bleed! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Does anybody know if any other head coach has elected to kick in OT besides the great Bellicheat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Belly Morninweg. The 'Butt toss' play. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Belichick was playing his SOJ card and he lost. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Jet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 i think the confusion was over choosing the direction of the kick. he thought they got to choose, but the winner chooses kick or receive and the loser chooses direction i guess you choose either kick or receive OR which direction to defend. So he was supposed to pick the goal to defend not kick or receive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Spoot-Face Posted December 27, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted December 27, 2015 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 If that was really Bill's decision, then we better ****in' see the football world tear him a new a$$hole for being dumb. No one should be exempt from ignominy in the face of stupidity. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYs Stepchild Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 (edited) i think the confusion was over choosing the direction of the kick. he thought they got to choose, but the winner chooses kick or receive and the loser chooses direction i guess He could have given the choice to the Jets in which case we would have chosen to receive. Then he would choose the direction. Instead he chose to kick. Edited December 27, 2015 by NYs Stepchild Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 you choose either kick or receive OR which direction to defend. So he was supposed to pick the goal to defend not kick or receive what?? they won the toss. they get to choose kick or receive, which they chose to kick. The pats were not supposed to choose which goal to defend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Coin-Fumble.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 i think the confusion was over choosing the direction of the kick. he thought they got to choose, but the winner chooses kick or receive and the loser chooses direction i guess that was my impression after watching it over a few times. they wanted to kick, but didn't get the direction they wanted, the refs let the jets choose the direction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Jet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 you choose one or the other the wind or who gets the ball. Not both. Can't say we wanna kick and defend the north goal Here’s the rule: Rule 4, Section 2, Article 2: Not more than three minutes before the kickoff of the first half, the Referee, in the presence of both team’s captains (limit of six per team, all of whom must be uniformed members of the Active List) shall toss a coin at the center of the field. Prior to the Referee’s toss, the call of “heads” or “tails” must be made by the captain of the visiting team, or by the captain designated by the Referee if there is no home team. Unless the winner of the toss defers his choice to the second half, he must choose one of two privileges, and the loser is given the other. The two privileges are: (a) The opportunity to receive the kickoff, or to kick off; or (b) The choice of goal his team will defend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 The biggest winner in all of this has gotta be Matt Hasselback. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Jet Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 He could have given the choice to the Jets in which case we would have chosen to receive. Then he would choose the direction. Instead he chose to kick. he could've choose direction and the choice of who gets the ball would've been the jets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sourceworx Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Just shows how overrated Belichick's "brilliance" is. If it weren't for Brady, he'd be Norv Turner. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.