Jump to content

Why not keep mo and trade our first + Leonard Williams


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SenorGato said:

How is that confusing? LOLZ

Maybe I write it in your language?

...Klecko Watt Brady Watt Brady Klecko Gastineau Klecko Brady.

I'm done playing with the petulant child/cat today have a nice weekend..:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Savage69 said:

What rule?? That's my opinion guess what check with Mac and Bowles you may find they share my view.. :) BTW Mo wouldn't play for the contract Snacks got..

And you know what Mo would or wouldn't play for because.....

Using your logic, why should he?  Hes better and does more than Snacks and Vernon.  

My point was they both make as much as what all but the highest paid QBs get.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh exquisite butthurt. This thread makes no sense. It's not like there's an option of trading up to 2 for either guy and OP is proposing that we choose to move Williams rather than Wilkerson. Wilkerson isn't going to get it done. Williams probably doesn't either, but if he did and we think whichever quarterback is there is our guy, then of course you make that deal. I mean it's not even a question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...