Jump to content
BroadwayJets

Judge Denies Brady's Appeal

Recommended Posts

Poor Tom Brady-everyone is against him and the Pats- whine on NE fans

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, greenwichjetfan said:

two three penis posts in a row.

awwwlrightttt

 

3 minutes ago, faba said:

Poor Tom Brady-everyone is against him and the Pats- whine on NE fans

 

F*ckin faba.  Ruined the streak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said:

I actually doubt RBG knows what a football is. 

Doesn't matter.  She definitely understands labor laws thoroughly.  And Brady's complaints have no place whatsoever in the Supreme Court.  "Got an issue?  Tell your NFLPA they should have thought about that when they agreed to the CBA."  That should be the only thing she has to write in her dismissal of the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said:

Gone-Girl-Ben-Affleck-Crying.jpg 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRgoy1fEaYZrveLhtX5rHX

 

Ben-Affleck-Cry.png 

What makes Ben sadder-Brady's upcoming suspension or his Batman ManBoobs being digitally  immortalized for eternity? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Klecko73isGod said:

Sick reference bro! You have the sickest references, everybody says so. 

Everyone always goes with Hitler or Stalin. Even a Mussolini reference slips in from time to time. But I like my references like I like my gymnasts.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He should have owned it from the start.  Low character guy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said:

Well this is just adorable.

I know right?

And I was only going for cute!  ☺

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said:

Everyone always goes with Hitler or Stalin. Even a Mussolini reference slips in from time to time. But I like my references like I like my gymnasts.  

How do you like your gymnastics? ((He asked... dreading the answer...)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Language of the court's order:

Quote

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.The Court further finds that as a matter of law Appellant Tom Brady is a huge douche.

 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thumb Down 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Integrity28 said:

Except nobody gives a **** about bike riding... 

Agreed, but he's still a cheating douche that refuses to take responsibility for anything. Much like Lance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Doesn't matter.  She definitely understands labor laws thoroughly.  And Brady's complaints have no place whatsoever in the Supreme Court.  "Got an issue?  Tell your NFLPA they should have thought about that when they agreed to the CBA."  That should be the only thing she has to write in her dismissal of the case.

Should be is right, but I think these judges have learned that they have the power of Sperms penis to delete any post and any reference to said post. The problem is that everyone that writes law, defends, law, enforces law, or judges law is a lawyer. None of them want to diminish each other's power. That's why law is written in legal ease so we can't defend ourselves. 

We should make it illegal for any executive branches to be lawyers, or from Harvard, or Yale. Enough already with the lawyers. Like that qualifies you to run a state or a country. Maybe we could mix in some business majors, economists, engineers, scientists...you know a little diversity with another perspective. Someone who's sole experience is not just in how to word things to cover your ass. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said:

Should be is right, but I think these judges have learned that they have the power of Sperms penis to delete any post and any reference to said post. The problem is that everyone that writes law, defends, law, enforces law, or judges law is a lawyer. None of them want to diminish each other's power. That's why law is written in legal ease so we can't defend ourselves. 

We should make it illegal for any executive branches to be lawyers, or from Harvard, or Yale. Enough already with the lawyers. Like that qualifies you to run a state or a country. Maybe we could mix in some business majors, economists, engineers, scientists...you know a little diversity with another perspective. Someone who's sole experience is not just in how to word things to cover your ass. 

This is hilarious if sarcastic. Bizarre if serious.

  • Thumb Down 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sperm Edwards said:

Not happening. I just deleted the post and the two who quoted it. 

It's a good thing @Jetsfan80 quoted my awesome response... hated to lose a great line like that... LOL

  • Thumb Down 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeesh... every time no psls posts an image he thinks is funny, it sucks the air right out of the thread... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Klecko73isGod said:

I'm at work. 

This is supposed to be a mother****ing, cocksucking family website you rotten sh*thead assholes!

dear klecko73.. hi !.. i note YOU r @ work.. ugggh, if,.. u r @ work.. why r u... oh,.. forget it  :rolleyes:  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't post politics or dumb obscene stuff that doesn't have anything at all to do with the topic.  If someone does try not to quote it. Easier to clean up that way.

 

 

Where the hell all the delusional Patriot trolls?  Astounding six pages troll free,  Did they change teams already?

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Crusher said:

Please don't post politics or dumb obscene stuff that doesn't have anything at all to do with the topic.  If someone does try not to quote it. Easier to clean up that way.

 

 

Where the hell all the delusional Patriot trolls?  Astounding six pages troll free,  Did they change teams already?

cool.

 

cheers ~ ~

:beer: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Crusher said:

Please don't post politics or dumb obscene stuff that doesn't have anything at all to do with the topic.  If someone does try not to quote it. Easier to clean up that way.

 

 

Where the hell all the delusional Patriot trolls?  Astounding six pages troll free,  Did they change teams already?

I have a feeling they are unhappy about something. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright, who are the legal geniuses around here?  What happens next?

  1. Is there a deadline Brady has to appeal to SCOTUS and request a stay by?
  2. Roughly how long will it take Ruth Ginsberb to reply about the stay?  Days/weeks?
  3. Odds the stay is granted?
  4. Odds SCOTUS will actually hear the case?

Annoying as $hit, but thankfully we're down to the last option here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Crusher said:

Please don't post politics or dumb obscene stuff that doesn't have anything at all to do with the topic.  If someone does try not to quote it. Easier to clean up that way.

 

 

Where the hell all the delusional Patriot trolls?  Astounding six pages troll free,  Did they change teams already?

i'm sure you mean me as well...hate to break it to ya..but this doesn't bother me one bit. Thought Brady should of been just serve the sentence.

 

and really it's too easy to pick on jet fans as a pats fan..so i dont know why any pat fan needs to care about this or the ruling (tired of this subject)...

 

NFL is back in 7 weeks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ghost_in_pads02 said:

i'm sure you mean me as well...hate to break it to ya..but this doesn't bother me one bit. Thought Brady should of been just serve the sentence.

 

and really it's too easy to pick on jet fans as a pats fan..so i dont know why any pat fan needs to care about this or the ruling (tired of this subject)...

 

NFL is back in 7 weeks!

O Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ghost_in_pads02 said:

i'm sure you mean me as well...hate to break it to ya..but this doesn't bother me one bit. Thought Brady should of been just serve the sentence.

 

and really it's too easy to pick on jet fans as a pats fan..so i dont know why any pat fan needs to care about this or the ruling (tired of this subject)...

 

NFL is back in 7 weeks!

Welcome to the site, thank you for joining.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, greenwichjetfan said:

two three penis posts in a row.

awwwlrightttt

and one was from a poster named sperm:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Mike135 said:

Alright, who are the legal geniuses around here?  What happens next?

  1. Is there a deadline Brady has to appeal to SCOTUS and request a stay by?
  2. Roughly how long will it take Ruth Ginsberb to reply about the stay?  Days/weeks?
  3. Odds the stay is granted?
  4. Odds SCOTUS will actually hear the case?

Annoying as $hit, but thankfully we're down to the last option here.

no legal geniuses around these parts. only rocket scientists:D

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rex-n-effect said:

This is hilarious if sarcastic. Bizarre if serious.

You do realize that the executive branch is different than the legislative, and judicial branches of government right? There may be a reason why most productive companies hire teams of lawyers but are not run by them. 

Then again I'm sure having 90% of the government run by lawyers that all have gone to the same exclusive schools and never actually held a real job is probably nothing to worry about. They're all basically trustworthy. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, do we know what the vote was among the 13(?) judges f/against granting the en banc appeal?

It never got that far. En Banc has to 1st be seen by a review board of three justices to see if a case meets standards for appeal. They affirmed that an appeal did not show need of merit and unanimously denied it.

Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Integrity28 said:

yeesh... every time no psls posts an image he thinks is funny, it sucks the air right out of the thread... 

He's like a real life combination of Amy Schumer.  Cringe-worthy and sucks the funny right out of a room.

I <3 the ignore feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And now we get a request for stay by the Supreme Court, and if that fails (which it should), Tom Brady will throw himself on the ground and throw a tantrum and threaten to take his deflated toys home. As much as I think this was all "over-inflated" in the first place, the commissioner has the authority to suspend him and did. Case closed already. I'm tired of the whiny-Tom show. It's Crappolo time in NE.

It will never get that far. It's an over two year wait for new cases and the US Supreme Court will not give Brady a Stay of Execution for a case unreviewable for that length if time.

Besides, I think you are right about him pulling a Barry Sanders.

Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...