Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, pdxgreen said:

Just curious, if we do blow the rest of the season down the sh*tter, how do we NOT take a QB?  Fitz is gone after this season.  Geno is toast. 

We are going to go into camp with a Brian Hoyer type?!  Chances are if Petty hasn't turned into anything close to being a decent backup, then hes gone.

And my guess it's 50/50 Hackenburg ever overcomes his throwing yips.... We NEED a competant young QB!

Sign Glennon

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Im working too hard. I meant Kyle Brady.  For some reason I can't edit it so yes, Im a doosh, Loved Shuler.  I meant Kyle Brady.

Why is Mickey Shuler and Vernon Gholston in the same sentence

You mean the Mickey Shuler who is 3rd all time in Jets receiving? The Mickey Shuler who was the anchor at TE for 14 years on the Jets? The Mickey Shuler who was a two time Pro Bowler? Okay - I'll take

Jaguars headed for 2-5 with authority, as they trail the Titans 17-0 already.  Luckily they can't pass us tonight since they have the weaker SOS by far. 

The Titans may need the Rams to keep losing in order to have one of their picks end up in the Top 10.  They're looking good and appear headed for 4-4.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 6:00 PM, southparkcpa said:

You clearly didn't read the 3 posts where about 10 posters called me out. And I apologized stating I meant Kyle Brady..... that's ok! You must have been online with me during surgery. Lots of Jets fans on that line lately. 😀

Yes, Peebag pointed that out to me.  Please look above.  I actually apologized and agreed Kyle Brady was the appropriate comparison.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Update:  http://www.sbnation.com/2016/11/6/13534802/2017-nfl-draft-order-cleveland-browns-san-francisco-49ers

 

# Team Rec. Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-9 0.000 0.531
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-7 0.125 0.508
3 Chicago Bears 2-6 0.250 0.511
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-6 0.250 0.537
5 New York Jets 3-6 0.333 0.492
6 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 3-5 0.375 0.480
7 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3-5 0.375 0.531
8 Carolina Panthers 3-5 0.375 0.535
9 Arizona Cardinals 3-4-1 0.429 0.472
10 Cincinnati Bengals 3-4-1 0.429 0.500
Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Update:  http://www.sbnation.com/2016/11/6/13534802/2017-nfl-draft-order-cleveland-browns-san-francisco-49ers

 

# Team Rec. Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-9 0.000 0.531
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-7 0.125 0.508
3 Chicago Bears 2-6 0.250 0.511
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-6 0.250 0.537
5 New York Jets 3-6 0.333 0.492
6 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 3-5 0.375 0.480
7 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3-5 0.375 0.531
8 Carolina Panthers 3-5 0.375 0.535
9 Arizona Cardinals 3-4-1 0.429 0.472
10 Cincinnati Bengals 3-4-1 0.429 0.500

I'm expecting us to beat the Rams next week and knock ourselves out of the Top 5 again

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just say no to Glennon. If He was that good He would already be a starter. Some guys have it some don't. If Glennon had it He would be untouchable. He is a career back-up. Nothing more. We already have a second stringer making starter money. I see no need to continue that trend. Pass on Glennon.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

# Team Rec. Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-10 0.000 0.532
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-8 0.111 0.521
3 Chicago Bears 2-7 0.222 0.510
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-7 0.222 0.541
5 New York Jets 3-7 0.300 0.496
6 Carolina Panthers 3-6 0.333 0.538
7 San Diego Chargers 4-6 0.400 0.544
8 Cincinnati Bengals 3-4-1  0.429 0.500
9 Buffalo Bills 4-5 0.444 0.462
10 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 4-5 0.444 0.482
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We need a stud left tackle who can play for the next 10 years. We need a disruptive edge-rusher. We need a lock-down corner. So, even if - by the grace of all things holy - we find a QB, that top 3 pick is going to be huge for us.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Integrity28 said:

We need a stud left tackle who can play for the next 10 years. We need a disruptive edge-rusher. We need a lock-down corner. So, even if - by the grace of all things holy - we find a QB, that top 3 pick is going to be huge for us.

Draft capital is king.  It's time to tank properly for once. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Integrity28 said:

We need a stud left tackle who can play for the next 10 years. We need a disruptive edge-rusher. We need a lock-down corner. So, even if - by the grace of all things holy - we find a QB, that top 3 pick is going to be huge for us.

Jabril Peppers, Leonard Fournette, Cam Robinson, Marlon Humphrey and Teez Tabor

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said:

Jabril Peppers, Leonard Fournette, Cam Robinson, Marlon Humphrey and Teez Tabor

So many hole on this roster, if we get top 5, I would not be opposed to trading back a few spots for an extra pick or 2

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chirorob said:

So many hole on this roster, if we get top 5, I would not be opposed to trading back a few spots for an extra pick or 2

Not as many as people think. OL and CB are the two main areas with holes.

LBers are young

 

Edited by UnitedWhofans
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said:

Not as many as people think. OL and CB are the two main areas with holes.

LBers are young

Both OT, Center, QB, TE, pass rusher, DE assuming Sheldon is gone, at least 2 corners.

Oh, and a QB

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, chirorob said:

Both OT, Center, QB, TE, pass rusher, DE assuming Sheldon is gone, at least 2 corners.

Oh, and a QB

LT, RT, TE, CB and QB.

That's about it.

Dont need a center. Wesley Johnson hs been solid this year.

Dont need a DE. We have 2 of those already. The Jets are better in a 3-4 defense

Pass Rusher, if played correct, we already have on our roster

 

Edited by UnitedWhofans
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said:

Not as many as people think. OL and CB are the two main areas with holes.

LBers are young

 

We only need a QB, a RB, 3 OL, an ILB, an OLB, and 2 CBs. No. Definitely not as many as people think.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Integrity28 said:

We only need a QB, a RB, 3 OL, an ILB, an OLB, and 2 CBs. No. Definitely not as many as people think.

RB not a priority yet. Forte has done well this year and Powell is still good. UNless we draft Fournette, I would wait on the RB.

Wesley Johnson is having a nice year at C. Need more to judge him, but I think we can knock that down to 2.

LBers are fine, unless we go after Peppers.

1-2 CBS.

So:  QB, LT, RT, CB. Those are the pressing needs right now. 4 holes.

Edited by UnitedWhofans
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, UnitedWhofans said:

RB not a priority yet. Forte has done well this year and Powell is still good. UNless we draft Fournette, I would wait on the RB.

Wesley Johnson is having a nice year at C. Need more to judge him, but I think we can knock that down to 2.

LBers are fine, unless we go after Peppers.

1-2 CBS.

So:  QB, LT, RT, CB. Those are the pressing needs right now. 4 holes.

Good plan. If you want to win 5 games next year. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Nov 28 update:

 

#                             Team                                   Rec.   Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-12 0.000 0.549
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-10 0.091 0.517
3 Chicago Bears 2-9 0.182 0.514
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-9 0.182 0.531
5 New York Jets 3-8 0.273 0.506
6 Cincinnati Bengals 3-7-1 0.300 0.517
7 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 4-7 0.364 0.500
8 Carolina Panthers 4-7 0.364 0.538
9 Arizona Cardinals 4-6-1 0.400 0.480
10 Green Bay Packers 4-6 0.400 0.529
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Nov 28 update:

 

#                             Team                                   Rec.   Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-12 0.000 0.549
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-10 0.091 0.517
3 Chicago Bears 2-9 0.182 0.514
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-9 0.182 0.531
5 New York Jets 3-8 0.273 0.506
6 Cincinnati Bengals 3-7-1 0.300 0.517
7 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 4-7 0.364 0.500
8 Carolina Panthers 4-7 0.364 0.538
9 Arizona Cardinals 4-6-1 0.400 0.480
10 Green Bay Packers 4-6 0.400 0.529

What jumps out for me here is that, excluding the Jets themselves, 5 of the worst 8 NFL teams are on the Jets' schedule this year. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said:

Nov 28 update:

 

#                             Team                                   Rec.   Rec. % SoS %
1 Cleveland Browns 0-12 0.000 0.549
2 San Francisco 49ers 1-10 0.091 0.517
3 Chicago Bears 2-9 0.182 0.514
4 Jacksonville Jaguars 2-9 0.182 0.531
5 New York Jets 3-8 0.273 0.506
6 Cincinnati Bengals 3-7-1 0.300 0.517
7 Los Angeles Rams (pick belongs to Titans) 4-7 0.364 0.500
8 Carolina Panthers 4-7 0.364 0.538
9 Arizona Cardinals 4-6-1 0.400 0.480
10 Green Bay Packers 4-6 0.400 0.529

Bears and Niners play each other next week. Other than that, Bears have a chance vs Green Bay but probably not a lot more (@ Det, Wash, @ Min). Niners obviously play us too, on the West Coast so could be tough as they've stepped it up recently. Again, other than those 2 the rest of their schedule is tough (@ Atl, @ LA, Sea).

Jax have a tough remaining schedule, don't see much change for them (Den, Min, @ Hou, Tenn, @ Indy). 

Bengals get to play the Browns once more (could it be Cleveland's one win this season?). Outside of that, Phi, Pitt, @ Hou, Balt is a tough slate.

Rams have Niners and Cards still to play; Panthers get @ Sea, SD, @ Wash, Atl, @ TB to finish; Cards have Wash, @ Mia, NO, @ Sea, @ LA. Pack have Philly tonight, then Hou, @ Sea, @ Chi, Min, @ Det. i can see all of them winning at least one more game.

In all honesty I don't see us going much higher than 5, and maybe dropping a spot to 6. 4 of our 5 remaining games have play-off implications as thing stand (for the other teams, obviously ;-)). Could hinge on Week 14 - Jets @ SF, Cincy @ Cleveland - as to whether we get #5 or #6.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sperm Edwards said:

What jumps out for me here is that, excluding the Jets themselves, 5 of the worst 8 NFL teams are on the Jets' schedule this year. 

5 of 8? Cleveland, Cincy, LA, SF = 4. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jamesr said:

Worst 8 teams ... Arizona are 9th.

Or are you excluding the Jets from the worst 8 as well?

If one is excluding the Jets themselves, which is precisely what I said, the remaining 8 worst teams would include Arizona. Otherwise it would be the 7 worst.

8 - 1 = 7 not 8 - 1 = 8

Seriously, are you this desperate to try for a putdown?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...