Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SenorGato

2016-2017 Non-Cubs/Yankees/Mets Free Agency and Off-season

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, SenorGato said:

Trout should be celebrating his 5th MVP too. This was worth a chuckle:

https://mobile.twitter.com/TonyMassarotti/status/799392294965223425?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

 

 

Yeah. Trout really helped the Angels. Kept them from having 69 wins instead of 74. Best and most valuable aren't the same thing. Trout would probably give up every single award for a chance to swap places with Mookie. Easily. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, SenorGato said:

Go from one team that didn't win it all to another team that didn't win it all? What does that do for him?

Making the playoffs > Not making the playoffs.

Anyway, that tweet was correct Most Valuable does not equal best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, SenorGato said:

So is the idea here that the Angels are a playoff team with Mookie Betts instead of Mike Trout?

That's not what I said. I said the Angels were a bad team with or without Trout.  The Red Sox won the AL East with Mookie. Without him, they likely don't even make the playoffs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SenorGato said:

So, the Red Sox are a playoff team solely because they have Mookie Betts and therefore he is really the MVP?

This is why no one likes discussing stuff with you and you often find yourself talking with yourself about the Cubs on a Jets board. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SenorGato said:

I ask too mamy reasonable but apparently unanswerable questions?

Your questions are ridiculous and you're intentionally being obstructive. I stated my opinion. Mookie was more valuable to the Red Sox than Trout was to the Angels. You're welcome to disagree. No need to take this any further. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SenorGato said:

You stated your opinion on an internet forum. You fell apart within two questions about your opinion. 

Fell apart? You're out of your mind. I've stated my opinion. It's one shared by many, obviously. If you want to debate the merits of my opinion with stats or facts, be my guest. If you want to ask questions that you already know my answers to based on any basic level of logic, then there is no need for me to waste my time any further. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SenorGato said:

I mean, it's pretty hard to deny you fell apart completely within two questions given the direction you brought in. Swiss cheese, anxious defense for swiss cheese logic 

 

You took it this direction with your unnecessary and inane questions. I'm not sure how much clearer I could be when it comes to the opinion I posted. If you want to debate Mookie and Trout on their baseball merits I'm all for it. You'd rather post questions that are irrelevant to the discussion and add nothing to it. Which is typical for your posts across the board. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, SenorGato said:

Lol how the **** are those questions irrelevant? Yet another wackjob in the baseball forum getting defensive and angwy because he knows his "logic" is garbage. Getting indignant does not make your precious opinion any more sound or reasoned, if anything it shows that you're aware your opinion is based on nonsense you can't actually defend.

What is with these hypocritcal little babies in the baseball forum? You whine like little girls about how I act like my sh*t doesn't stink, meanwhile you have your precious opinions questioned, not even criticized yet, and *immediately* launch into a limpdick tirade about how precious they are and questioning them is mean. You immeeeediiiiiately went into full defense lol, transparently and solely to get ahead of knowing you're just being a homer with giant, easily exposed holes in your opinion.

Back to ignore with you. Good lord get over yourself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, RutgersJetFan said:

I don't know if there was ever a more fun at-bat in baseball than Vlad, at least in my lifetime. Used to love the way he'd flick his bat out for stuff that was so far off the plate and still make it work. Had that bazooka attached to his shoulder for gunning runners down too. I will never forget when Rheal Cormier tried to intentionally walk him and Vlad turned it into a walk-off anyways. There are not a ton of obscure regular season memories seared into my memories but that one's there forever. First ballot lock for sure. And the couple writers that vote against him on principle, because there's always a few, are d-bags.

Didn't he hit a ball that hit the ground and bounced before the plate once?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said:

Selig getting into the Hall is preposterous. The guys who did steroids can't get in, but the guy who let them do them, he's fine? Seriously?

Pretty much. It's a joke.

6 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said:

I understand now, that the writers who vote are going to have to reveal their ballot, starting with the 2018 vote.

They will. Should be interesting and it should have already been a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...