Jump to content

Bills, 49ers, Jets all out of Glennon bidding


Gas2No99

Recommended Posts

8374.jpg
 
 
 

CSN Chicago reports the 49ers, Jets, and Bills have all dropped out of the bidding for free agent Mike Glennon.

We're not convinced the Bills were ever involved, while multiple reports elsewhere suggest the Jets were severely outbid by the Bears. Bay Area reports state the 49ers have "no interest" in Glennon at all. With only the Bears left to bid, it's possible Glennon's price tag drops below his expected $14-15 million annually. All signs continue to point toward Glennon landing in Chicago.
Source: CSN Chicago 
Mar 7 - 2:51 PM
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Looking at the salaries of the starting NFL QB's and Glennon is probably where he should be at in the 15m range.  This excludes the QB's with rookie contracts.

YES - he hasn't done anything but this is the economy right now especially for a QB's that have talent like Glennon.  

Tyrod is going to cost the same thing or more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BigRy56 said:

Severely outbid means they are planning to pony up Osweiler money IMO.... GTFOH with that, the Bears can have him

Bingo.  I was fine with the theoretical concept of him being here, if it were on the cheap.  But in today's NFL, the cost of free agent QBs is absolutely laughable for guys who have proven very little.  Osweiler was basically the perfect example of "what not to do".  Just like it was for Matt Cassel, Matt Flynn, and plenty of other backup QBs who teams paid to hopefully be their guy based on a very small sample size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Larz said:

looks like the bears made a strong first move, I'm sure glennons agent would have preferred more of a bidding war

Either the agent would have preferred a bidding war, or is absolutely thrilled as the Bears right now are saying "um, crap... we really meant less than that" when they realize every other team already finds their opening bid to not even be worth discussing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bleedin Green said:

Bingo.  I was fine with the theoretical concept of him being here, if it were on the cheap.  But in today's NFL, the cost of free agent QBs is absolutely laughable for guys who have proven very little.  Osweiler was basically the perfect example of "what not to do".  Just like it was for Matt Cassel, Matt Flynn, and plenty of other backup QBs who teams paid to hopefully be their guy based on a very small sample size.

Is Osweiler the perfect example of get to the second round of the playoffs without JJ Watt?

 

Some cautionary tale!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Glennon is a better prosect than Hackenberg. But he isn't a sure thing. So I like the process of the Jets having interest, following it but having a ceiling.

Good move.

Now if the price drops or if he doesn't want to go to Chicago, you can jump back in. But no reason to help drive up the price if you are actually interested in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bleedin Green said:

Either the agent would have preferred a bidding war, or is absolutely thrilled as the Bears right now are saying "um, crap... we really meant less than that" when they realize every other team already finds their opening bid to not even be worth discussing.

I seem to recall specific dollars can't be discussed until the legal tampering period is over, so unless the bears broke the rules they mus have just said something like "he will enjoy living next to osweiller" lol

when friday gets here he may be in fitz' neighborhood, lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thadude said:

Is Osweiler the perfect example of get to the second round of the playoffs without JJ Watt?

 

Some cautionary tale!

 

A team having moderate success in spite of sh*tty QB doesn't make that QB any less sh*tty, especially when benched for the sh*tty backup who the team did as well, or better, with.  But if you think Osweiler's play last season merits $18M/year, there's not really much to discuss here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bleedin Green said:

 

A team having moderate success in spite of sh*tty QB doesn't make that QB any less sh*tty, especially when benched for the sh*tty backup who the team did as well, or better, with.  But if you think Osweiler's play last season merits $18M/year, there's not really much to discuss here.

Your the one saying Osweiler is this big cautionary tale and why we can't sign Glennon yet he made the playoffs last year and won a playoff game -- his "stacked" team didn't even have its best player the entire year

 

Sorry if facts don't square with your amateur capologists argument

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jet Life said:

Dodged a bullet. Thank god!

WE STILL may have a few more to dodge.

raw

 

 

There's nothing wrong with kicking the tires and taking a test-drive, but Mac better be thrifty and should focus on bringing in Locker room Leaders, savvy Veterans that can provide depth at multiple positions (OL, DBs) while also help groom the draft picks that Mac seems to be harping as the true foundation of the Jets going forward. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gas2No99 said:

WE STILL may have a few more to dodge.

raw

 

 

There's nothing wrong with kicking the tires and taking a test-drive, but Mac better be thrifty and should focus on bringing in Locker room Leaders, savvy Veterans that can provide depth at multiple positions (OL, DBs) while also help groom the draft picks that Mac seems to be harping as the true foundation of the Jets going forward. 

 

Damn it.  Great gif choice.  I like mine but this one is more suitable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CSN Chicago reports the 49ers, Jets, and Bills have all dropped out of the bidding for free agent Mike Glennon.

We're not convinced the Bills were ever involved, while multiple reports elsewhere suggest the Jets were severely outbid by the Bears. Bay Area reports state the 49ers have "no interest" in Glennon at all. With only the Bears left to bid, it's possible Glennon's price tag drops below his expected $14-15 million annually. All signs continue to point toward Glennon landing in Chicago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...