sciond Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 This is like swallowing vomit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 6 hours ago, Scoop24 said: Then based on your logic Stephen Hill should of been 2nd coming Randy Moss . Especially when he went from Geno to Cam .. A lazy reductio ad absurdum is the last bastion of a losing argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Mart Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 19 minutes ago, Lith said: Yeah, but I think it depends on how the teams prioritize their picks. If Tye was our #1 priority claim then Carr would have to make it past the entire league before we would get a shot at him. Ahh. That rings a bell. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I always liked Kerley this seems like a short term depth signing to me. He may not see much playing time unless the team plays better than expected. He is still going enough that if he were to shine we could try and resign him to be part of the rebuild but I wouldn't count on it.Sent from my LGUS991 using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoop24 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 37 minutes ago, jgb said: A lazy reductio ad absurdum is the last bastion of a losing argument Eh okay .. no argument to lose here he isn't and will never be Wes Welker or Edelman.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Scoop24 said: Eh okay .. no argument to lose here he isn't and will never be Wes Welker or Edelman.. Correct because he signed with the Jets, a place where even Welker or Edelman wouldn't be Welker or Edelman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 2 hours ago, dbatesman said: It's so refreshing to finally have a Personnel Guy™at the helm The only reason that MaccBowles survives for 2018 if Woody realizing that a credible replacement would demand total control and a ton of money. I think he is done with these first timers, and they with him. 2 hours ago, C Mart said: Well if you go by the conspiracy theory many here live by and how the Jets reporting structure is screwed up w/Mcc & Bowles each reporting to Woody, this is a Mcc move. Mcc controls the 53 man. Bowles controls the gameday. I would think Macc is finding players his coaches want and dumping the likes of Kerley on them. I would be interested to hear how they are getting along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I'm not interested in hearing negative stuff about my team 5 days before our first game. Our record is 0-0 and some of these guys make it sound like we're 0-16. I thought fans and management were supposed to be positive going into game 1 but not here. As for adding Kerley. With Kearse it gives us only two wide receivers with over one season in the NFL. So what's the complaint. We have plenty of young receivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saul Goodman Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 No issue with this. You guys are delusional thinking that we have this deep stable of young receivers. Bunch of mid and late round talents. Charon Peake lol. You guys would laugh if the comments made here had been on a Miami or Buffalo message board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
56mehl56 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Saul Goodman said: No issue with this. You guys are delusional thinking that we have this deep stable of young receivers. Bunch of mid and late round talents. Charon Peake lol. You guys would laugh if the comments made here had been on a Miami or Buffalo message board. Likewise we would laugh if Miami or Buffalo signed Kerley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted September 6, 2017 Author Share Posted September 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, Rangers9 said: I'm not interested in hearing negative stuff about my team 5 days before our first game. Our record is 0-0 and some of these guys make it sound like we're 0-16. I thought fans and management were supposed to be positive going into game 1 but not here. As for adding Kerley. With Kearse it gives us only two wide receivers with over one season in the NFL. So what's the complaint. We have plenty of young receivers. The mentality of some of these "fans" is ridiculous. I can't wait for Sunday, I hope we kick the Bills ass!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
win4ever Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Lith said: They did put in a claim for Carr, just did not get him according to Manish Why didn't they get him? I'm honestly asking, not in a sarcastic manner or anything. I was under the impression that the WW doesn't reset, so why did the Saints get him? Or is it tiered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 20 minutes ago, win4ever said: Why didn't they get him? I'm honestly asking, not in a sarcastic manner or anything. I was under the impression that the WW doesn't reset, so why did the Saints get him? Or is it tiered? Unless they were late, it doesn't make sense. Waiver claims are granted in draft order until the end of week 3 of the regular season. I'm curious as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 9 hours ago, C Mart said: Maybe Raymond. Kerley can fair catch punts. Stewart KOR? IMO Peake is a need for Punt/KO coverage. Ah, the memories! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 We seriously resigned Jeremy Kerley? smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 9 hours ago, Kleckineau said: Kerley is a jag. If he was an Edleman or Welker talent maybe BB would have waited and grabbed him instead trading Brissett BB has enough of Kerley type talent in Edleman, Amendola and to some extent Cooks who a lot more speed on the outside. Dorsett needs to improve his mental toughness which I'm sure BB does a decent job of teaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 38 minutes ago, Jetscode1 said: BB has enough of Kerley type talent in Edleman, Amendola and to some extent Cooks who a lot more speed on the outside. Dorsett needs to improve his mental toughness which I'm sure BB does a decent job of teaching. Adderall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 10 hours ago, prime21 said: Might has well have brought in the Salsa Dancer. Kerley was one of ours. Cruz is a washed up bum. Green > Blue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Jetscode1 said: BB has enough of Kerley type talent in Edleman, Amendola and to some extent Cooks who a lot more speed on the outside. Dorsett needs to improve his mental toughness which I'm sure BB does a decent job of teaching. Yeah Amendola is very similar and actually his closest comparator from athletic profile is also Welker, same as Kerley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Island Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 10 hours ago, Jetlife33 said: Wasn't Kerley in Bowles' dog house his first year as HC? I thought it was Gaileys dog house, maybe they use him as a WR this time instead of a fair catch magnet PR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Island Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 7 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Jets signed WR Jeremy Kerley, formerly of the 49ers, to a one-year contract. Who gets cut? Please be Marshall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Island Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 6 hours ago, Rangers9 said: Another thing about Kerley is he's a reliable punt returner. He doesn't drop high kicks or turn the ball over. You are not going to get a deep return with him but you'll get the league average and no turnovers. As for saying he's a jag or mediocre player. Rosters are built on guys who can fill a role and aren't stars. That's really what NEP is about. They cut guys like Ealy not because they don't have talent but because they don't fit in and play a role that fits their scheme. Cheating is what the patsies are about. None of their rings are legit, not one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lot K Tailgaters Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I like the move. I always liked Kerley. He's probably a better #3 receiver but we need help at the position. You need some veterans to help rebuild and this team desperately needs that. We also need some WR help if we want to throw Petty or Hackenberg back out there eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 9 hours ago, Scoop24 said: Eh okay .. no argument to lose here he isn't and will never be Wes Welker or Edelman.. maybe not but he's also not playing for the patsies. kerley has had good success on two different teams and is a good pick up at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoop24 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 1 hour ago, rangerous said: maybe not but he's also not playing for the patsies. kerley has had good success on two different teams and is a good pick up at this point. He had 600 yards and 2 Tds not even his best season then got traded and cut .. relax bro . Kerley is who Is at this point in his career .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 this is a todd bowles panic pickup .. playing an average at best veteran over inexperience. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 I'm very happy with this move. We need the help and experience at WR that Kerley brings. I hated when he left last year. Keep in mind that he lead SF in receptions last year with 64. Good, solid move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 14 hours ago, win4ever said: Why didn't they get him? I'm honestly asking, not in a sarcastic manner or anything. I was under the impression that the WW doesn't reset, so why did the Saints get him? Or is it tiered? I'm still wondering about this. We're 6th and New Orleans is 11th. Like you, my impression as well is that's the pecking order for every player (i.e. it's not like waiver wire rounds in fantasy football, where our #1 request was Tye or someone else whom we got, where the Saints' #1 request was Carr). I always thought every player's waiver was taken as its own mini-draft (with us then picking #6 overall in every draft, as opposed to picking #6 in every request "round"). Or maybe the leak of us putting in a WW request is just a poorly thought-out lie that's easily debunked as being BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: I'm still wondering about this. We're 6th and New Orleans is 11th. Like you, my impression as well is that's the pecking order for every player (i.e. it's not like waiver wire rounds in fantasy football, where our #1 request was Tye or someone else whom we got, where the Saints' #1 request was Carr). I always thought every player's waiver was taken as its own mini-draft (with us then picking #6 overall in every draft, as opposed to picking #6 in every request "round"). Or maybe the leak of us putting in a WW request is just a poorly thought-out lie that's easily debunked as being BS. Yeah, I had looked around a bit and didn't see anything that would suggest the Saints would ever be ahead of the Jets for any waiver at this point in the year. Other than the very real possibility of it being BS, especially when considering the source, the only other thing I can think is if teams can "bundle" waiver claims. Essentially, if there were two different players the team is interested in, but only have one roster spot that they would be willing to open up for either of them, so put in a claim for the first/higher priority player and say that if that player isn't available to them, they would then want to claim the second. No idea if the NFL allows anything like that, but it's only other thing I can think of that might explain this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYs Stepchild Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 10 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: I'm still wondering about this. We're 6th and New Orleans is 11th. Like you, my impression as well is that's the pecking order for every player (i.e. it's not like waiver wire rounds in fantasy football, where our #1 request was Tye or someone else whom we got, where the Saints' #1 request was Carr). I always thought every player's waiver was taken as its own mini-draft (with us then picking #6 overall in every draft, as opposed to picking #6 in every request "round"). Or maybe the leak of us putting in a WW request is just a poorly thought-out lie that's easily debunked as being BS. If it's true then would have had to have rescinded our claim after being awarded other players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 8 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said: If it's true then would have had to have rescinded our claim after being awarded other players. Could be, but I'd expect that to be part of the explanation, instead of just saying the Jets also put in a waiver, and leaving it at that. Makes it sound like the Saints were awarded Carr over us being awarded Carr. But yeah, there are only so many possible explanations, and rescinding a claim is one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckkieB Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Kearse and Kerley instead of Marshall and Decker. Yeah, the team isn't tanking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 39 minutes ago, ChuckkieB said: Kearse and Kerley instead of Marshall and Decker. Yeah, the team isn't tanking. Lol I was going to add above (still on my clipboard after cutting): That said, they could have also signed or traded for other veterans once the initial cap room was cleared. That is, if they weren't really tanking for a high QB pick, plus using this year as 6 months of tryouts to make the 2018 team. Beachum + Claiborne is not an offseason for a 5-win team that's serious about improving its win total the following year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 17 hours ago, JetsFanatic said: The mentality of some of these "fans" is ridiculous. I can't wait for Sunday, I hope we kick the Bills ass!! Why? So we can continue to torture our own eyeballs with Hack/Petty in 2018? Go BILLS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted September 6, 2017 Share Posted September 6, 2017 Never understand why Macagnan cut Kerley to begin with but he is a waste of time as our GM so there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.