Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
UnitedWhofans

Snacks just lost a lot of cred


Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Just now, nyjunc said:

I don't disagree, they could have let him play out season but I also don't think he is above benching.

and we've had 3 HCs, 3 GMs, 4 different full time starting QBs.

smart organizations don't tank, they know talent can be found anywhere.

Tell the Colts who got both Manning and Luck tanking or the San Antonio Spurs who got Duncan via tanking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Philc1 said:

Tell the Colts who got both Manning and Luck tanking or the San Antonio Spurs who got Duncan via tanking

The Colts didn't tank for Manning and let's not forget the big talk going into that draft was how close Peyton and Ryan Leaf were.  There is no such thing as a sure thing.

The Colts did tank for Luck but that hasn't really worked out w/ the injuries, has it?

Basketball is a very different sport and the Spurs had the 3rd worst record in the NBA that season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, nyjunc said:

I don't disagree, they could have let him play out season but I also don't think he is above benching.

 

I definitely see your point. Don’t think he is above benching either, maybe it’s just getting for Geno...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, nyjunc said:

I don't disagree, they could have let him play out season but I also don't think he is above benching.

 

I definitely see your point. Don’t think he is above benching either, maybe it’s just getting  benched for Geno...lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, nyjunc said:

I don't disagree, they could have let him play out season but I also don't think he is above benching.

 

I definitely see your point. Don’t think he is above benching either, maybe it’s just getting  benched for Geno...lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 6:31 PM, ASH1962 said:

Giants are a hot mess, but you can guarantee they will wind up better in the end then we will with a higher pick, better coach, better GM.

 

Unreal, it never changes.

HE GETS IT.  GIANTS END UP TANKING FOR A FRANCHISE QB

JETS HAVE DRECK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/28/2017 at 6:58 PM, UnitedWhofans said:

ANd he should have let MO walk too

He would have if that goofball Sheldon Richardson didn't drive 140 MPH with weed, a handgun and 12 YO in his car.

Mo will rework his contract next year, or be gone giving us another $18M to add to our $77M in cap space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like the maintenance workers switched the locker rooms of the Giants and Jets in the off season and now the G-Men have all of the circus spirits around them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, nyjunc said:

The Colts didn't tank for Manning and let's not forget the big talk going into that draft was how close Peyton and Ryan Leaf were.  There is no such thing as a sure thing.

The Colts did tank for Luck but that hasn't really worked out w/ the injuries, has it?

Basketball is a very different sport and the Spurs had the 3rd worst record in the NBA that season. 

Tanking is exactly what the colts did for Manning and Luck.  They started Curtis Painter and 41 year old Kerry Collins for crying out loud

 

And it’s actually harder to tank in the nba because the lottery just ask the Knicks

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Philc1 said:

Tanking is exactly what the colts did for Manning and Luck.  They started Curtis Painter and 41 year old Kerry Collins for crying out loud

 

And it’s actually harder to tank in the nba because the lottery just ask the Knicks

 

They tanked for Luck, that's what I wrote but what have they gained from it?  Luck can be great but he's barely played the last 2 seasons and who knows what will happen in the future? are they better off than they would have been keeping Peyton for a few more seasons?

and they didn't tank in 1997.  They were just bad as they were in 1998 w/ Peyton.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, nyjunc said:

They tanked for Luck, that's what I wrote but what have they gained from it?  Luck can be great but he's barely played the last 2 seasons and who knows what will happen in the future? are they better off than they would have been keeping Peyton for a few more seasons?

and they didn't tank in 1997.  They were just bad as they were in 1998 w/ Peyton.

 

The rest of the colts player personnel management has sucked besides tanking for Manning and Luck but they have been way more consistently in the playoffs and competitive than the jets last 20 years and btw have 2 Super Bowl appearances and won one and Luck got to an AFCG with horrible personnel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Philc1 said:

The rest of the colts player personnel management has sucked besides tanking for Manning and Luck but they have been way more consistently in the playoffs and competitive than the jets last 20 years and btw have 2 Super Bowl appearances and won one and Luck got to an AFCG with horrible personnel

Yes having 3 mediocre teams in the same division certainly helps that consistency.

Let them play the Pats twice a year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Philc1 said:

The rest of the colts player personnel management has sucked besides tanking for Manning and Luck but they have been way more consistently in the playoffs and competitive than the jets last 20 years and btw have 2 Super Bowl appearances and won one and Luck got to an AFCG with horrible personnel

again, they didn't tank for manning and they had the most talented roster in football the majority of Peyton's career.

They did tank for Luck and they got one title game out of it so far, will they get more? they have made the playoffs 3 out of 6 years in the worst division in football and they have 3 playoff wins.  We made it 2 of 4 seasons w/ Sanchez, had 2 title game apps and 4 PO wins.

By the way, we had the opportunity to get Peyton if Parcells just told his family they would pick him #1 in 1997 but he didn't want that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
×