Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Freemanm

Do we really want Kirk Cousins?

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, section314 said:

Gruden sounds like an idiot....probably much more of the problem in Washington than Cousins.

Or maybe he is just trying to not be Rex Ryan. Who was such a great Revis promoter “ declaring he is the best ever “ right before contract time sure didn’t help jets later. 

  Cousins is not a great qb you tie up a ton of guaranteed $$ to. I’d take him sure, but he definitely should be given elite $$    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Drums said:

This thread sums it up. Haven’t had a QB in forever and you are nitpicking like it’s your money to spend or that 30 years old is even old. Give me a break. Kirk Cousins and draft a guy that can develop. This isn’t Glennon. This isn’t Osweiller. Of course his coach isn’t going to say much. Why would he drive up the price? 

Honestly people. This is a chance to get a good qb and then have a chanve to develpp really good qb that will be ready to roll in a few years like the packers and giants of the world. We at least have to try. 

This isn't about Woody's pocket book...There's a salary cap that has to be spent by league rules. As fans we're trying to determine the best way in which to spend that money.  

For the purposes of this debate and thread it is our money to spend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

 

Why everyone acts like this guy is a scrub is beyond me. He’s a borderline Top 10 QB just hitting the prime of his career. 

 

I don't think it's borderline.  By any measure I can think of he's solidly in the 6-10 range in terms of performance.  And that's with a below average roster to work with.

And for everyone barking about him being 29,  almost all of the best QBs in the league right now are far older.  Brady, Brees, Ben, Rivers are all at least 36 and still balling.  So a five year deal doesn't really seem to bring us past his potential prime.  

I'll say it again.  I'm not claiming he's a sure thing to be our savior, but he is far more of a sure thing than almost any other option out there.  I'd love to land Rosen, or Mayfield if that's how the draft falls, but I would be very excited for Jets football in 2018 if we landed Cousins and got him some OL help and maybe another RB to work with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

Sure he has solid stats but 9 wins, 8 wins and 7 wins.  One wildcard playoff loss...

I think winning is important and I think the QB has the most say in a team's ability to do so.  His win/loss record could be the definition of mediocrity.

The guy plays in the most stacked division in the most stacked conference and presides over a pretty damn mediocre Redskins team. 

I’m not going to fault the hell out of him for not going 13-3 and winning multiple playoff games every year. If he managed that, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

Sure he has solid stats but 9 wins, 8 wins and 7 wins.  One wildcard playoff loss...

I think winning is important and I think the QB has the most say in a team's ability to do so.  His win/loss record could be the definition of mediocrity.

So is he responsible for the 9 wins or the 7 losses? Can't have it both ways. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, nycdan said:

I don't think it's borderline.  By any measure I can think of he's solidly in the 6-10 range in terms of performance.  And that's with a below average roster to work with.

And for everyone barking about him being 29,  almost all of the best QBs in the league right now are far older.  Brady, Brees, Ben, Rivers are all at least 36 and still balling.  So a five year deal doesn't really seem to bring us past his potential prime.  

I'll say it again.  I'm not claiming he's a sure thing to be our savior, but he is far more of a sure thing than almost any other option out there.  I'd love to land Rosen, or Mayfield if that's how the draft falls, but I would be very excited for Jets football in 2018 if we landed Cousins and got him some OL help and maybe another RB to work with.

What about the most important measure?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

This isn't about Woody's pocket book...There's a salary cap that has to be spent by league rules. As fans we're trying to determine the best way in which to spend that money.  

For the purposes of this debate and thread it is our money to spend.

Cousins is zero threat to the short or likely even the long term salary cap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Grandy said:

I'd want him. He's been top 5 for the last 3 years, still pretty young, and when you look at his stats, he'd probably be the best QB we've ever had.

Top 5?!?!?!

Top 5?!?!?!

That notion is so absurd I don't even have a worthy response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

The guy plays in the most stacked division in the most stacked conference and presides over a pretty damn mediocre Redskins team. 

I’m not going to fault the hell out of him for not going 13-3 and winning multiple playoff games every year. If he managed that, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion right now.

we're in a division with possibly the best team of all times and another team that just made the playoffs.  

I guess the question I have for the people that want him...let's say he plays until he's 36 - so six years (or at least at his current level)

Would you be happy with two wildcard playoff appearance with maybe one win?  Because I wouldn't.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FidelioJet said:

we're in a division with possibly the best team of all times and another team that just made the playoffs.  

I guess the question I have for the people that want him...let's say he plays until he's 36 - so six years (or at least at his current level)

Would you be happy with two wildcard playoff appearance with maybe one win?  Because I wouldn't.  

 

I would accept it, already have actually. See I am so desperate to feel anything at QB that,  despite knowing this outcome already, he must be signed. 

OTOH if a rookie is drafted, plays until he is 36, and they make two WC appearances with one win it will be fine because he came cheap! I would enjoy those savings over the next 14-15 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a big fan of Cousins at all. He's another above average type QB. Would rather resign McCown, draft another one, and have Petty and Hackenburg battle it out for the #3 spot.

 

McCown knows the system if OC's do not change, a quality teammate/leader type, and would be a hell of a lot cheaper. The money if Mac were to throw at Cousins would be better off using towards the offensive line, IMO. We need a center, another guard, and preferably LT. I'm just not a real Cousins fan. Never was. I would rather have McCown back for another year then have Cousins. Please stay away Mac.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

we're in a division with possibly the best team of all times and another team that just made the playoffs.  

I guess the question I have for the people that want him...let's say he plays until he's 36 - so six years (or at least at his current level)

Would you be happy with two wildcard playoff appearance with maybe one win?  Because I wouldn't.  

 

Yeah, we’re in a division with the best team...whose HOF QB and HC are at most two years away from being history and the entire division will be up for grabs.

And we’d have a Top 10 QB at 31/32 years old while Miami is still probably dicking around with Tannehill and Buffalo is doing god knows what. Buffalo needed a last minute desperation score from Cincy to even squeak into the playoffs. I’m not shaking in my boots over them, especially after we beat the brakes off of them 2 months ago with a 38 year old McCown and one of the least talented rosters in the league.

Kirk Cousins >>> Tyrod and Tannehill 

And I’m not even going to play hypotheticals about how many playoff games Cousins would potentially win here. All I know is that he’s a pretty damn good QB who would instantly become the best signal caller we’ve had probably since Kenny O in the mid-80’s. That’s good enough for me. Let the rest of it fall as it may.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SenorGato said:

I would accept it, already have actually. See I am so desperate to feel anything at QB that,  despite knowing this outcome already, he must be signed. 

OTOH if a rookie is drafted, plays until he is 36, and they make two WC appearances with one win it will be fine because he came cheap! I would enjoy those savings over the next 14-15 years.

It's not about necessarily the money it's the best way to allocate that moeny.

I would rather have the $30mm to build support around a young QB - as opposed to paying $30mm to a 30 year old QB and not the resources to build a team around him that will be required with his skill-set.

Again, this isn't about being competitive it's what's the more likely scenario to winning a super bowl.  As long as a shot it is - drafting a QB now - gives us a better chance to win a super bowl than paying $30mm to Cousins.  Winning a Super Bowl is the ONLY thing I care about.

At least that's my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, First_Blood said:

Not a big fan of Cousins at all. He's another above average type QB. Would rather resign McCown, draft another one, and have Petty and Hackenburg battle it out for the #3 spot.

 

McCown knows the system if OC's do not change, a quality teammate/leader type, and would be a hell of a lot cheaper. The money if Mac were to throw at Cousins would be better off using towards the offensive line, IMO. We need a center, another guard, and preferably LT. I'm just not a real Cousins fan. Never was. I would rather have McCown back for another year then have Cousins. Please stay away Mac.

Another! They’re all over the place these above average QB’s!

All these above average QBs laying around but they should select McCown? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think it's borderline.  By any measure I can think of he's solidly in the 6-10 range in terms of performance.  And that's with a below average roster to work with.
And for everyone barking about him being 29,  almost all of the best QBs in the league right now are far older.  Brady, Brees, Ben, Rivers are all at least 36 and still balling.  So a five year deal doesn't really seem to bring us past his potential prime.  
I'll say it again.  I'm not claiming he's a sure thing to be our savior, but he is far more of a sure thing than almost any other option out there.  I'd love to land Rosen, or Mayfield if that's how the draft falls, but I would be very excited for Jets football in 2018 if we landed Cousins and got him some OL help and maybe another RB to work with.

As a player cousins is 27. He sat the first two years


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It couldn’t be more obvious that they are going for him. These guys have been chasing him for three years now. He will complete Bowles’ dream roster capable of 7-8 wins. 

We could offer him a Bobby Bonilla type deal over 15 years!


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Patriot Killa said:

30 years old when the season starts. I’d personally pass for that fact alone. I mean..if we wind up getting him, the only way I’m not mad is if we do so well we win 10 plus games and go to the playoffs. And even then i’d Still feel robbed because it’ll take forever to get another guy worthy of FQB status long after Cousins. But i want Baker. I want Rosen. I want a guy who has a chance to do just as good or better for 10 plus years. These attractive bandaid options are getting tedious. We are always screaming about the alternative way until we take it and then we want to revert back to our organizations ways when the opportunity presents itself.

If the Jets were to sign Cousins, it would be to be the starter for the next five years or so, at which point Hackenberg should be pretty close to ready to take over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

30 years old when the season starts. I’d personally pass for that fact alone. I mean..if we wind up getting him, the only way I’m not mad is if we do so well we win 10 plus games and go to the playoffs. And even then i’d Still feel robbed because it’ll take forever to get another guy worthy of FQB status long after Cousins. But i want Baker. I want Rosen. I want a guy who has a chance to do just as good or better for 10 plus years. These attractive bandaid options are getting tedious. We are always screaming about the alternative way until we take it and then we want to revert back to our organizations ways when the opportunity presents itself.

30 years old is too old? Brady is 40. Brees is 38. Rivers is 36. Roethlisberger is 35. Those 4 were in the top 5 in passing yards this year. 

Some of you are WAY too greedy. If Cousins produced at the same level as he has in Washington, he instantly becomes an all-time Jet great QB. Cousins managed to pass for 4k yards this year after losing via FA or Injury  Desean Jackson/Garcon/Jordan Reed/Chris Thompson. Those guys were replaced by Terrel Pryor who was an absolute bust/Jameison Crowder- Decent and a rookie Doctson that is still very raw. Despite all of those built in excuses, Cousins passed for 4,000 yards for the 3rd straight season. 

Put him on a Jets team with a roster that is improving (instead of devolving) and he will give us 5 years of high end QB production. With our young and improving Defense we should be playoff contenders every year. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JoJoTownsell1 said:

30 years old is too old? Brady is 40. Brees is 38. Rivers is 36. Roethlisberger is 35. Those 4 were in the top 5 in passing yards this year. 

Some of you are WAY too greedy. If Cousins produced at the same level as he has in Washington, he instantly becomes an all-time Jet great QB. Cousins managed to pass for 4k yards this year after losing via FA or Injury  Desean Jackson/Garcon/Jordan Reed/Chris Thompson. Those guys were replaced by Terrel Pryor who was an absolute bust/Jameison Crowder- Decent and a rookie Doctson that is still very raw. Despite all of those built in excuses, Cousins passed for 4,000 yards for the 3rd straight season. 

Put him on a Jets team with a roster that is improving (instead of devolving) and he will give us 5 years of high end QB production. With our young and improving Defense we should be playoff contenders every year. 
 

Those players you mentioned also have been playing at that level and putting together playoffs seasons their entire career. Kirk hasn’t. Even with Deshaun Jackson, ect, etc they STILL posted a 8 win record. I’m not passing on the opportunity to get a younger guy who could possibly maybe WIN more than 8 games or WIN a playoff game. I’m not too greedy, you guys are too desperate..rightfully so..but you don’t let that blind you in the grand scheme of things. You risk not being able to get a young FQB for another “5/6” years. We are in position to take our shot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

This isn't about Woody's pocket book...There's a salary cap that has to be spent by league rules. As fans we're trying to determine the best way in which to spend that money.  

For the purposes of this debate and thread it is our money to spend.

Except that no one mentions that since the rookie pay scale was put into place, there is no longer such a thing as "cap hell".

The league, by putting in the rookie cap, freed up millions of dollars for teams to allocate to veterans each season AND to roll over if they dont spend it.  Thats why when you look, there are roughly 15 teams with huge money to spend whereas in the past it was 2 or 3 and a team like the Browns, with picks 1 and 4 would be paying 2 enormous signing bonuses which they no longer have to.

On top of that, it is very VERY rare for a player to hit FA that deserves a huge payday, as LT, Edge and QB rarely hit the market, so its not really a "Cousins or...." scenario.  If it was cousins or von miller, then sure, lets take miller and draft a QB, but since there are no Von Millers available in FA, spending $20 or $25 million per year on a proven QB, and drafting defense and oline to build around him, is not a bad strategy and also does not hurt the team long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

It's not about necessarily the money it's the best way to allocate that moeny.

I would rather have the $30mm to build support around a young QB - as opposed to paying $30mm to a 30 year old QB and not the resources to build a team around him that will be required with his skill-set.

Again, this isn't about being competitive it's what's the more likely scenario to winning a super bowl.  As long as a shot it is - drafting a QB now - gives us a better chance to win a super bowl than paying $30mm to Cousins.  Winning a Super Bowl is the ONLY thing I care about.

At least that's my opinion.

Sorry do they run out of “resources” once they pay Cousins? 

Maybe this exercise will help...

Say they only have $30 million and their draft picks to spend. Really they have nearly triple that $30 million to spend even before cuts are made, but say they have $30.

If that $30 million “only” buys an ancient 30 year old passer coming off 3 straight years ranked among the top dozen, twice in the top 7, what quality of FA support is this unknown cheaper, younger passer getting? If that money only buys you one over the hill loser, why could it suddenly land multiple studs elsewhere? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, BrickTamland said:

Kirk was not a big time Nfl prospect coming out of college.

He is not a celebrity in ads.

He is not a physical specimen.

He does not have a superstar personality. Someone who went to MSU told me that Kirk way was too nice for a football player.

For these reasons he is not seen as the answer, despite his stats and his dealing with bad o-line injuries and injuries to TE Reed, and the WR turnover in WAS.

However, these are reasons why he has a chip on his shoulder and why i personally like him a lot. At 30, he’s got at least 6-8 years of good play.

Why are smart posters saying he will take half of the salary cap. You know that’s BS. Come on dudes. I like college prospects too but those comments are dumb. 25M is not half of 180M. So stop with the silly talk. It’s approximately one-seventh.

Roughly 25TD to 12 INT and 4000 yards may not be worth 25M. That’s a fair argument. But don’t say it’s half the cap. 

It hinders our chances of getting a young guy this year. I like the young guys this year. That’s why. Baker can’t sit behind Cousins for 5-6 years. Rosen can’t either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



×