Kleckineau Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Historical tendencies tell us Macc will def go defense in the first round, probably a CB so that creates 2 burning (not during urination) questions. Who will be the QB picked by Macc in round 2 or 3 ? Will Bowels (sic yes) name McCown the starter while he is still an unsigned UFA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 in the 1st round of this year's draft we're taking.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 If all early signs point to the Jets being in the same sh*t-show at QB, I will stop being a Jet fan. There must be at least an attempt to address the position in a way I can feel optimistic about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, Gastineau Lives said: If all early signs point to the Jets being in the same sh*t-show at QB, I will stop being a Jet fan. There must be at least an attempt to address the position in a way I can feel optimistic about. So...not Tim Tebow, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Gastineau Lives said: If all early signs point to the Jets being in the same sh*t-show at QB, I will stop being a Jet fan. There must be at least an attempt to address the position in a way I can feel optimistic about. So its safe to say you wont be buying a #15 Josh McCown jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, kelly said: in the 1st round of this year's draft we're taking.. or.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RESNewYork Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 17 minutes ago, Kleckineau said: Historical tendencies tell us Macc will def go defense in the first round, probably a CB so that creates 2 burning (not during urination) questions. Who will be the QB picked by Macc in round 2 or 3 ? Will Bowels (sic yes) name McCown the starter while he is still an unsigned UFA? lotto numbers? stock tips? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pennington Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 10 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said: If all early signs point to the Jets being in the same sh*t-show at QB, I will stop being a Jet fan. There must be at least an attempt to address the position in a way I can feel optimistic about. Find a way to get one of Darnold, Rosen, or Mayfield. Its the only acceptable outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, Pennington said: Find a way to get Darnold ! !... Its the only acceptable outcome. fixed ^ ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 It's either Cousins or a first round QB - there is really no other way to go. I really don't believe Mac/Bowles/Johnson don't see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgivs21 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 As much as I hate to say it, I agree! If all QBs do enter the draft, Dnarold & Rosen are the first 2 gone. If some really loves Allen they'll trade up to 3, I don't see the Jets doing that. So we'll be left w/ Mayfield or Jackson. I don't think Mac goes for either of those guys. So we're left w/ some other top prospect & either signing Kirk Cousins or Keenum or we have a rinse repeat of this year w/ McCown back at QB & Hack backing him up w/ whatever rookie project QB they draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Untouchable Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 People need to get over the constant doom and gloom. Both Macc and Bowles are essentially on 1 year “prove it” contracts. They know they have to get a QB. Hell, it’s likely that Johnson & Johnson made that clear before they signed them to an extension. The Jets are either signing Cousins or re-signing McCown and taking a QB in Round 1. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, Untouchable said: People need to get over the constant doom and gloom. Both Macc and Bowles are essentially on 1 year “prove it” contracts. They know they have to get a QB. Hell, it’s likely that Johnson & Johnson made that clear before they signed them to an extension. The Jets are either signing Cousins or re-signing McCown and taking a QB in Round 1. Period. I don't think you can sign Cousins and take a QB in the 1st round. I get the sense it's either Cousins with Hack or McCown with Allen/Mayfield- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Untouchable Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, FidelioJet said: I don't think you can sign Cousins and take a QB in the 1st round. I get the sense it's either Cousins with Hack or McCown with Allen/Mayfield- You can’t They’ll either throw the bank at Cousins or they’ll bring back McCown on another 1 year deal and take a QB in the Top 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 25 minutes ago, RESNewYork said: lotto numbers? stock tips? Lotto? good luck! Stock tips? I get paid for those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 OK the q was what QB does Macc take in the 2nd or third. I say Drew Lock because Falk will already be gone. And yes I think before the draft Bowels will be telling the media how McCown is his starter for 2018 Will he still be unsigned when he says this?.............prob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 51 minutes ago, Kleckineau said: Historical tendencies tell us Macc will def go defense in the first round, probably a CB so that creates 2 burning (not during urination) questions. Who will be the QB picked by Macc in round 2 or 3 ? Will Bowels (sic yes) name McCown the starter while he is still an unsigned UFA? I expect news of a McCown resigning to occur any time. And I agree, we will not draft a QB in Round 1. At best, maybe, our 2nd pick in Round 2. If that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, Kleckineau said: OK the q was what QB does Macc take in the 2nd or third. I say Drew Lock because Falk will already be gone. And yes I think before the draft Bowels will be telling the media how McCown is his starter for 2018 Will he still be unsigned when he says this?.............prob Honestly, there's no way this happens. The only way McCown is the starter is if we draft a QB in round 1 and that'll be just for 2 or 3 weeks. I am one of the few that have faith in Mac/Bowles and don't think they're buffoons - they get this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Ifyou promise me the first overall pick in 19 and Mac andBowles gone I'm fine w a LT at 6 I guess ...and a center in the 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Kleckineau said: Historical tendencies tell us Macc will def go defense in the first round, probably a CB so that creates 2 burning (not during urination) questions. Who will be the QB picked by Macc in round 2 or 3 ? Will Bowels (sic yes) name McCown the starter while he is still an unsigned UFA? No historical tendencies say that Macc will go with the BPA regardless of offense or defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Historical tendencies say mac will draft a big strong armed Qb with low mobility and then ignore the oline in the draft totally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Beerfish said: Historical tendencies say mac will draft a big strong armed Qb with low mobility and then ignore the oline in the draft totally. YOu were fine up to that point. He has drafted OL before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said: YOu were fine up to that point. He has drafted OL before 2 out of 21 picks as the Gm of the jets both 5th rounders. He was also part of the David Carr Regime in Houston that drafted their franchise guy then watched as he got his ass beat to a pulp for for about 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Beerfish said: 2 out of 21 picks as the Gm of the jets both 5th rounders. He was also part of the David Carr Regime in Houston that drafted their franchise guy then watched as he got his ass beat to a pulp for for about 3 years. You said Totally. That means all. I'm sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckkieB Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Unless the Jets sign Cousins, I cannot see how they pass on a QB in round 1. In fact, I think they might even trade up to pick # 3 or 4 to make sure they grab their QB of choice before Denver does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said: You said Totally. That means all. I'm sorry Ha! So you use this response in this thread and in the Buffalo making the playoffs thread you go 100% in the opposite direction. This is whey people can not take 95% of your post seriously, just like njjunc in one ahead you use one set of posting dynamics and tin the next one you go 100% in the opposite direction to fit you latest totally illogical point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, ChuckkieB said: Unless the Jets sign Cousins, I cannot see how they pass on a QB in round 1. In fact, I think they might even trade up to pick # 3 or 4 to make sure they grab their QB of choice before Denver does. I would certainly hope so at this point but I would be lying if I don't have some doubt. Best thing that can happen is Denver signs Cousins if we don't. Then we just got to make sure we move up to their spot if need be to get our guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 minute ago, Beerfish said: Ha! So you use this response in this thread and in the Buffalo making the playoffs thread you go 100% in the opposite direction. No you just misinterpreted what I said/meant in the other thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Lets say the Jets drafted a highly rated pass rusher. Would people really be mad? As much as I would love to see my team draft an offensive skill player in the 1st (because we never do) would it really be bad if the Jets got a top pass rusher? I'm not talking about a D-Lineman like Wilkerson, Richardson, or Williams. I'm talking about an edge rusher. I couldn't complain if the Jets did that. They haven't had a legitimate one since John Abraham and that's such a key part to any defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandy Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 The only way we don't go QB is if we sign Cousins, which we're most likely not getting cousins. If anything, we'd move up to grab Darnold or Rosen, as we seem to like them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Gastineau Lives said: If all early signs point to the Jets being in the same sh*t-show at QB, I will stop being a Jet fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 49 minutes ago, Untouchable said: People need to get over the constant doom and gloom. Both Macc and Bowles are essentially on 1 year “prove it” contracts. They know they have to get a QB. Hell, it’s likely that Johnson & Johnson made that clear before they signed them to an extension. The Jets are either signing Cousins or re-signing McCown and taking a QB in Round 1. Period. they may make a bid for cousins but it also may fail. imo they will take a qb whether it be in round one or later depends on them signing a good free agent qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 58 minutes ago, bgivs21 said: As much as I hate to say it, I agree! If all QBs do enter the draft, Dnarold & Rosen are the first 2 gone. If some really loves Allen they'll trade up to 3, I don't see the Jets doing that. So we'll be left w/ Mayfield or Jackson. I don't think Mac goes for either of those guys. So we're left w/ some other top prospect & either signing Kirk Cousins or Keenum or we have a rinse repeat of this year w/ McCown back at QB & Hack backing him up w/ whatever rookie project QB they draft. I originally was for Keenum if we couldn’t land Cousins but Keenum scares me because he only has one year of stellar performance and his arm is not that great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 We can only hope and pray, but I'd be surprised if the Jets didn't draft a QB in the first or sign a big game in FA. I think they will aggressively address the position -- how could they not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.