Jump to content

Would you Trade for Foles?


Ken Schroy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Ken Shroy said:

He has proven he can play. The eagles may listen to some offers. What would be needed to get him?

Just asking...

On what planet has he proven he can play? He’s not very good and there are better options out there without giving up assets and probably better in the draft as well. Hard pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joewilly12 said:

Way better than the LOSER NFL QB's the Jets drag in here. 

He would have to be used right, JW. And then once teams get his RPO success on film...it’s over with. It’s okay for now because he isn’t a permanent starter...you really think if they play in the super bowl in two weeks, that the Patriots won’t have that RPO locked up after seeing it in each of their playoff games? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CrazyCarl40 said:

On what planet has he proven he can play? He’s not very good and there are better options out there without giving up assets and probably better in the draft as well. Hard pass. 

You may not like him, but its clear since Wentz was injured that hes doing well. I hope you like Cousins, that is Macs guy. Good Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ken Shroy said:

You may not like him, but its clear since Wentz was injured that hes doing well. I hope you like Cousins, that is Macs guy. Good Luck.

Cousins is far and away better than Foles. Foles would be a solid backup but nothing more. No more retreads, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CrazyCarl40 said:

Cousins is far and away better than Foles. Foles would be a solid backup but nothing more. No more retreads, thanks.

Cousins better than Foles? Casualol who has more playoff wins? Cousins is a born loser. Foles is a born winner. That is the difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would the Eagles trade him.  He is under contract for $7MM next season--reasonable back-uo $$.  And the Eagles have seen first hand the value of having a capable, experienced backup.  For a team that is expected to contend next season, they will bring him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ken Shroy said:

He has proven he can play. The eagles may listen to some offers. What would be needed to get him?

Just asking...

Sure you don’t wanna just talk about it instead of butt fumbling me?? 

idk I guess I just don’t hand out negitive reps that often unless it’s absolute garbage. 

We can talk if ya want buddy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

I’m this close to posting a “Debunking the Nick Foles/ Mick Foley comparisons” thread

 

Quote

"Nick's a good quarterback," Eagles right tackle Lane Johnson said.

 

This is an expert opinion from someone who sees Foles everyday. Are you saying you know more about Nick Foles and winning football than Lane Johnson? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SenorGato said:

 

 

This is an expert opinion from someone who sees Folk everyday. Are you saying you know more about Nick Foles and winning football than Lane Johnson? 

Lane Johnson is such a tool. He should of said “NO my current starting QB and long time teammate is TRASH.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...