Jump to content

FREE AGENT NEWS


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Integrity28 said:

Oh, are we starting with the ‘not a win-now’ narrative already? 

#realultimaterebuild

If we signed Cousins it would've been #competitiverebuild

But we didn't.

So now it's #don't-sign-anyone-too-good-that-it-will-save-MaccBowles-job

Come on, man.  Keep up.  

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Many of the same people who have bitched incessantly for a year about drafting 2 safeties and abhor the idea of drafting Minkah Fitzpatrick are now whining that we didn't sign Tyran Mathieu.  If there

Posted Images

Just now, Scoop24 said:

Dude had 40 catches a year ago

That doesn’t make him a pass catching RB. If you actually watch him play the game of football, it would be immediately evident that he isn’t a RB in the mold of today’s explosive pass-catching RBs. Teams want Alvin Kamara, those are the RBs you pay for.

Crowell is good, but he’s best used as a thumper. Good to have, but not as expensive. 

Its okay for him to be what he is. Not a big deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RedBeardedSavage said:

If we signed Cousins it would've been #competitiverebuild

But we didn't.

So now it's #don't-sign-anyone-too-good-that-it-will-save-MaccBowles-job

Come on, man.  Keep up.  

Eek. Rather get decent players in. See if Mac can get his QB. Then see   how bowles handles things. If they suck then can Bowles and maybe Mac.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BrickTamland said:

Eek. Rather get decent players in. See if Mac can get his QB. Then see   how bowles handles things. If they suck then can Bowles and maybe Mac.

I mean, if we were signing offensive lineman, I'd be all for it.

But for a third safety that's 5'9?  Naaa

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Integrity28 said:

That doesn’t make him a pass catching RB. If you actually watch him play the game of football, it would be immediately evident that he isn’t a RB in the mold of today’s explosive pass-catching RBs. Teams want Alvin Kamara, those are the RBs you pay for.

Crowell is good, but he’s best used as a thumper. Good to have, but not as expensive. 

Its okay for him to be what he is. Not a big deal.

Your making way to many excuses fam . We get it u don’t like him that’s Fine . The jets are clearly looking for the scat back to pair with him . Let’s just see how it works out .

even Kamra has thumper type in Ingram to compliment him .

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Scoop24 said:

Your making way to many excuses fam . We get it u don’t like him that’s Fine . The jets are clearly looking for the scat back to pair with him . Let’s just see how it works out .

even Kamra has thumper type in Ingram to compliment him .

cheap replacement for forte.  and i still think part of the logic is that they may be dealing up for a qb and won't sit with 3 picks on day 2 to fill rb/wr/Te like we would all want to in an ideal world.  so if we have to live with crowell and a real qb, i'll take that combo.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Scoop24 said:

Your making way to many excuses fam . We get it u don’t like him that’s Fine . The jets are clearly looking for the scat back to pair with him . Let’s just see how it works out .

even Kamra has thumper type in Ingram to compliment him .

Nope. I’m pointing out positional value. That’s not an excuse. I wasn’t even criticizing him. Simply making the point that a grinder is worth less than an all-purpose back.

Not my fault it’s over your head. Funny that you managed to come across dumber than United. Didn’t see that coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Integrity28 said:

Nope. I’m pointing out positional value. That’s not an excuse. I wasn’t even criticizing him. Simply making the point that a grinder is worth less than an all-purpose back.

 

While you are correct, that's still a huge drop from 4/30m to 3/12m

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Augustiniak said:

cheap replacement for forte.  and i still think part of the logic is that they may be dealing up for a qb and won't sit with 3 picks on day 2 to fill rb/wr/Te like we would all want to in an ideal world.  so if we have to live with crowell and a real qb, i'll take that combo.

In the role they tried using forte, he’s actually a much better fit. When we got forte his ypc up the middle was down around 2 yds. He was done as a grinder. Crowell is perfect for that role.

And yes, he can catch occasional passes, but he doesn’t create mismatches as a receiver. Those are guys who get paid.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Integrity28 said:

In the role they tried using forte, he’s actually a much better fit. When we got forte his ypc up the middle was down around 2 yds. He was done as a grinder. Crowell is perfect for that role.

And yes, he can catch occasional passes, but he doesn’t create mismatches as a receiver. Those are guys who get paid.

which is why crowell got paid what he's getting paid.  

remember, is this the scheme where denver had 1,000 yard rushers who were no-names?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...