Jump to content
joewilly12

FREE AGENT NEWS

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Matt39 said:

If they bring in both theyre not going QB at 6 or moving up.

They wouldn’t even think about it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lith said:

 

Lith I didn't recognize you without the bulldog! 

I'm fine with Bridgewater and QB in the first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, T0mShane said:

 

This is what you call—to use the parlance of our times—a freefall.

noone here would be upset if mccagnan traded up for a qb.  that doesn't mean he should sit on $100 in cap space though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

They wouldn’t even think about it. 

I knew this was going to happen. Bowles is the worst.

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Augustiniak said:

didn't mccagnan say the other day that he's going to be active in free agency?  i'd love to see what his interpretation of being inactive is.

Following reporters twitter feeds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Augustiniak said:

at least he's not over 35, but that's where the happiness ends.

I would rather roll the dice on Bridgewater's health than roll with a 39 year old McCown.  If he can get/stay healthy at 25, Bridgewater could be a long term answer.  No more 35+ QBs, please.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Matt39 said:

I knew this was going to happen. Bowles is the worst.

The worst part is how predictable this has all been. The only question is if Minkah drops to six after Buffalo trades up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ScarletKnight89 said:

They have needs on defense especially at CB and edge rusher. But this is an offensive driven league. It's just frustrating to be reading about all these top offensive FAs going to other teams.

Yea I get that, It's just hard to get players without a QB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Lith said:

 

Fine. Bring in Teddy. Trade back, get extra picks, draft Lauletta. 

  • Thumb Down 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgewater and trading up is fine. 

However that tweet reads like "they will think about it", which means they probably won't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lith said:

I would rather roll the dice on Bridgewater's health than roll with a 39 year old McCown.  If he can get/stay healthy at 25, Bridgewater could be a long term answer.  No more 35+ QBs, please.

the problem is that mccagnan will convince himself he's struck untapped gold like he did when he took hack, and bypass qb in the first round.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it may be possible to still have a decent free agency.

2 olinemen: 20mil

Backup vet QB: 6mil? (Mccown)

WR: 8mil (Paul Richardson?) 

2 CBs: 25mil

DE: 10mil

Leaves like 20mil for rookies, in seasson moves and carryover.

Macc just need to get off his ads and get to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

 

This is what you call—to use the parlance of our times—a freefall.

It's what everyone has been thinking they'd do for months...

The only reason to bring in Bridgewater is if you're cutting Hack..  I don't think Teddy is going to want to come here to be a 3 though.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDL_JET said:

Lith I didn't recognize you without the bulldog! 

I'm fine with Bridgewater and QB in the first. 

UGA was grad school.  Penn was undergrad.  Penn made the NCAAs.  Penn avatar stays until we lose.  So expect Uga to be back by Thursday afternoon -- after the Penn-Kansas game.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When do the Jets start leaking that they weren’t really interested in Cousins?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

 

This is what you call—to use the parlance of our times—a freefall.

No it’s called a UFO 🛸 

The Unbelievably Freaking Obvious 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Augustiniak said:

the problem is that mccagnan will convince himself he's struck untapped gold like he did when he took hack, and bypass qb in the first round.  

Bridgewater and a first rounder I can live with.  Bridgewater/Hack/Petty, not so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, First_Blood said:

Teddy's career will be completely finished with our offensive line

that's whey they can draft lamar so he can be the running back.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, T0mShane said:

When do the Jets start leaking that they weren’t really interested in Cousins?

They should be bringing in Jay Horowitz for some expert guidance.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Lith said:

 

And when they finally pick up the phone to call Bridgewater will already be inking his deal as a backup elsewhere because the thought of playing for the Jets with their talent level is extremely unappealing, and bad for his career, and also because he knows he would probably end up being the backup to a 1st round QB they draft by week 6 the latest.

The Jets better ink McCown before somebody else does for their sake, thou I’m personally hoping by the time Cousins ends his visit with Minny, and finally makes the signing official that Bridgewater, McCarron, McCown, and any other QB worth anything is all signed forcing Todd Bowles to play whatever rookie QB Macc hands him.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pac said:

It's what everyone has been thinking they'd do for months...

The only reason to bring in Bridgewater is if you're cutting Hack..  I don't think Teddy is going to want to come here to be a 3 though.  

 

Bowles wants QBs with a built-in excuse not to play over McCown, so Bridgewater’s knee and Hackenberg’s awfulness will give him those excuses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also wouldn’t think Bridgewater is a lock to sign here yet.Arizona is far and away the better opportunity for him.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgewater + QB at 6 is tolerable I suppose. I really hope he wouldn't prevent us from drafting someone at 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Beerfish said:

Our plan is Bridgewater?  for gods sakes.

Bridge is light years a better option than drafting Allen at 6 or resigning McClown. There are other prospects worth drafting like Lauletta, Falk, Jackson, Rudolph. Mac would have to trade up to get Mayfield and it’s just not in his DNA. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

Bowles wants QBs with a built-in excuse not to play over McCown, so Bridgewater’s knee and Hackenberg’s awfulness will give him those excuses.

dude.

if they miss on Cousins they are re-signing McCown and drafting a QB at 6 or moving up.  That is an acceptable solution.

If Macc only signs McCown and Teddy and ignores QB in the 1st round he will not last the year.  He knows this.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...