New York Mick Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 2 hours ago, redlichtie said: Surprisingly little actual combine results talk in here! anyway Marcus Davenport at 6-6 264 running a 4.58...add him to the top ten maybe even top 6 conversation Are they starting 4x40 relay teams in the NFL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redlichtie Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, New York Mick said: Are they starting a 4x40 relay teams in the NFL? Have another go, only this time in English Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pointdexter Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 I'm still driving the Jaylen Samuels bandwagon. Measures in at 5'11 225 and runs a 4.5 electronic 40. Outside of Barkley that may be the most impressive size - speed combo. And the kid is a football player, has outstanding tape. Perfect for a West coast system because he's equally adept running and receiving. Reminds me a bit of Anquan Boldin in body type and game. Keep an eye out in rd 3, he would be a steal for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 39 minutes ago, redlichtie said: Have another go, only this time in English Not sure what happened to my first response That doesn’t answer your asinine post. You’re saying a D2 player most have going around 20 is going to jump into the top 6 because he ran fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Sweat may have gotten himself into the second round today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 hours ago, redlichtie said: Surprisingly little actual combine results talk in here! anyway Marcus Davenport at 6-6 264 running a 4.58...add him to the top ten maybe even top 6 conversation I don’t care how fast he runs in a straight line. I need to know his cone drills and how quick he can bend corners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: I don’t care how fast he runs in a straight line. I need to know his cone drills and how quick he can bend corners. He runs high in the cones fwiw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 4 minutes ago, HessStation said: He runs high in the cones fwiw Good deal then. How did my guy Trumaine Edmunds do?(if you know) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 Yeah that cone number is not good for chubb but it surprised me because he looks very good in his tape getting around corners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 9 minutes ago, HessStation said: He runs high in the cones fwiw 3 cone: 7.20 vert: 33.5 meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 One thing that was totally affirmed in the drills today. Linebackers can't catch..at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 4, 2018 Share Posted March 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Patriot Killa said: Good deal then. How did my guy Trumaine Edmunds do?(if you know) I only saw his 40 which I'm sure you saw the number. Marquis Haynes seemed impressive in the drills I saw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Beerfish said: One thing that was totally affirmed in the drills today. Linebackers can't catch..at all I thought the same and gave the kid from BYU major extra points for actually seeming like the only one w eye hand coordination. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeardedSavage Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 Harold Landry Boston College 6-2 252 4.64 4.65 1.59 10 yard split 6.88 3 cone 24 bench press 36 Vertical 9-11 Broad 32 7/8 Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 3 minutes ago, RedBeardedSavage said: Harold Landry Boston College 6-2 252 4.64 4.65 1.59 10 yard split 6.88 3 cone 24 bench press 36 Vertical 9-11 Broad 32 7/8 Any thoughts? Top 10 pick and should be in consideration at 6 depending on the QB situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 15 minutes ago, RedBeardedSavage said: Harold Landry Boston College 6-2 252 4.64 4.65 1.59 10 yard split 6.88 3 cone 24 bench press 36 Vertical 9-11 Broad 32 7/8 Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeardedSavage Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 minute ago, T0mShane said: Well... nobody is gonna look good next to that guy. But I like Landry nonetheless. I'd say he should be in the consideration for 6. Agreed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 minute ago, RedBeardedSavage said: Well... nobody is gonna look good next to that guy. But I like Landry nonetheless. I'd say he should be in the consideration for 6. Agreed? He absolutely should be. The likelihood the Jets will consider him there though is slim. Watt last year and Beasley in 2015 were both similar prospects and the Jets passed on both at 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 minute ago, RedBeardedSavage said: Well... nobody is gonna look good next to that guy. But I like Landry nonetheless. I'd say he should be in the consideration for 6. Agreed? Oh, hell yeah. I put Miller’s numbers up because they’re considered legendary, and Landry’s were relatively close. I had been reading some Landry hate on the draft boards, so these times were encouraging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge4Tide Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 1 minute ago, RedBeardedSavage said: Well... nobody is gonna look good next to that guy. But I like Landry nonetheless. I'd say he should be in the consideration for 6. Agreed? I like him, and you can never have too many pass rushers these days, but he's not a good scheme fit for a 3-4 defensive team. If we sign cousins or otherwise address the QB prior to the draft, I suppose it's not totally out of the question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeardedSavage Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 6 minutes ago, Sarge4Tide said: I like him, and you can never have too many pass rushers these days, but he's not a good scheme fit for a 3-4 defensive team. If we sign cousins or otherwise address the QB prior to the draft, I suppose it's not totally out of the question I think he's projected as a 3-4 guy: 7 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Oh, hell yeah. I put Miller’s numbers up because they’re considered legendary, and Landry’s were relatively close. I had been reading some Landry hate on the draft boards, so these times were encouraging. Ah! Gotcha. Yea I think I'm converted to Landry > Chubb right now. Maybe that's putting too much into the combine but hey I'm an amateur. 10 minutes ago, Matt39 said: He absolutely should be. The likelihood the Jets will consider him there though is slim. Watt last year and Beasley in 2015 were both similar prospects and the Jets passed on both at 6. It was Leo Will over Beasley, right? That's not terrible, although I'd rather have Beasley. And Watt is good but really I was more upset about Adams over Mahomes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 5, 2018 Share Posted March 5, 2018 2 minutes ago, RedBeardedSavage said: I think he's projected as a 3-4 guy: Ah! Gotcha. Yea I think I'm converted to Landry > Chubb right now. Maybe that's putting too much into the combine but hey I'm an amateur. It was Leo Will over Beasley, right? That's not terrible, although I'd rather have Beasley. And Watt is good but really I was more upset about Adams over Mahomes. I wouldn’t bail on Chubb just yet. The three cone was meh, but it’s not terminal for a guy with his size. If he was 230? That’d be gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.