Who Has The Better Situation: Jets Or Browns?

[TuscanyTile2]

Hypothetically speaking, if the Jets were allowed to swap their players/draft picks/cap situation for the Browns players/draft picks/cap situation, would you do it?  We'd still have Macc/Bowles/Woody and Chris Johnson, etc. 

The Browns have Tyrod at QB right now but they'll have their pick of QBs.  They can also trade down if they want to and get a bounty for that.  Heck, they can probably take a QB at #1 and still get a bounty for #4. 

So which team is better set up for the future?

[Jetsfan80]

They have picks 1 and 4 in the draft.  Browns, easily.

[DMan77]

The Browns. 

[jetstream23]

Forget the draft picks, look at their skill positions compared to the Jets outside of QB....Josh Gordon and Jarvis Landry at WR, David Njoku drafted at TE last year, Duke Johnson (and possibly Barkley on the way)?  On D how about Myles Garrett, Jabril Peppers, Ogbah, etc.?

I like what the Browns have done recently.  Their roster is slightly better than the Jets right now and that's before they end up drafting ahead of the Jets TWICE before the Jets even make their first pick.

[UnitedWhofans]

In terms of the opportunity and assets, the Browns are better set up for the future. BUT, just like the Jets, there’s one big obstacle in their way.

They’re the Browns. 

[Grandy]

Browns have the #1, and #4.

They have the better situation, and it's not even remotely close

[jetstream23]

Hypothetically, if the Jets were picking in the Browns' spots this year, 1 and 4, who would you want to take?

I think I'd go Rosen and either Barkley or Chubb.

[Joe W. Namath]

The Browns by far.  But it really boils down to who nails the qb position in this draft.

[TuscanyTile2]

Just now, Joe W. Namath said:

The Browns by far.  But it really boils down to who nails the qb position in this draft.

Very, very true. 

In fact, very, very, very true.

[Grandy]

15 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

I think I'd go Rosen and either Barkley or Chubb.

Ditto on that.

[TuscanyTile2]

If I were the Browns' GM, I'd draft a QB with the #1 pick (I'd trust whoever the scouts like) and trade down with the #4 pick.

[Sonny Werblin]

While the browns are the easy answer, I have concerns that the browns give little weight to the "type" of players they are willing to put on their team. That was a leaderless team last season going through the motions. I like tyrod but his own coaches bailed on him last season. Their is just something that is "off" on the player mix at the factory of sadness. Hopefully, they draft some leaders this year who can right the ship. But, as of right now, they are still headed for that iceberg.

[Gastineau Lives]

The Browns beat the ******* balls off of us without Josh Gordon and Jarvis Landry and Corey Coleman and Tyrod Taylor. If Deshone Kizer was remotely an NFL qb the score would have reflected that.

 

[TuscanyTile2]

4 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said:

The Browns beat the ******* balls off of us without Josh Gordon and Jarvis Landry and Corey Coleman and Tyrod Taylor. If Deshone Kizer was remotely an NFL qb the score would have reflected that.

 

Who is your profile pic of?  It makes think "dilly dilly".

[Obrien2Toon]

Jets

we established a winning culture last year

[TuscanyTile2]

2 minutes ago, Obrien2Toon said:

Jets

we established a winning culture last year

Didn't we go 5-11 and surrendered twice?

[BrickTamland]

Browms

[Obrien2Toon]

6 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Didn't we go 5-11 and surrendered twice?

I was being facetious 

[Sarge4Tide]

If y'all bitches think Cleveland is so great and the Jets are so horrible, take your whiny asses out the door

[Warfish]

Browns, and I'm shocked it's even a question.  

[Warfish]

Just now, Sarge4Tide said:

If y'all bitches think Cleveland is so great and the Jets are so horrible, take your whiny asses out the door

Because we're all Jets fans because the Jets were so great, right?  We're all just front runners, hence our Jets Fansdom!

[Gastineau Lives]

10 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Who is your profile pic of?  It makes think "dilly dilly".

Sir Laurence Olivier as Richard III

[Gastineau Lives]

2 minutes ago, Sarge4Tide said:

If y'all bitches think Cleveland is so great and the Jets are so horrible, take your whiny asses out the door

I guess my ass should be delusional.

[TuscanyTile2]

3 minutes ago, Obrien2Toon said:

I was being facetious 

Lol, my bad. 

[ZachEY]

47 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

Hypothetically, if the Jets were picking in the Browns' spots this year, 1 and 4, who would you want to take?

I think I'd go Rosen and either Barkley or Chubb.

Rosen and Mayfield.

[Integrity28]

56 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said:

In terms of the opportunity and assets, the Browns are better set up for the future. BUT, just like the Jets, there’s one big obstacle in their way.

They’re the Browns. 

You’re right, just like the Jets they’re the Browns.

[TuscanyTile2]

2 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said:

Sir Laurence Olivier as Richard III

"Oh, he's good!"

[T0mShane]

1. Browns

...

...

...

2,353. Tiny favelas along the southern coast of hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico where there is no electricity nor medical supplies and wild dogs feed on the putrefying bodies of children felled by cholera.

2,354. Jets 

[kevinc855]

Browns will still have a losing record next year 

[sciond]

Browns based on draft picks

[Beerfish]

33 minutes ago, kevinc855 said:

Browns will still have a losing record next year 

So will the jets

[dbatesman]

2 hours ago, UnitedWhofans said:

In terms of the opportunity and assets, the Browns are better set up for the future. BUT, just like the Jets, there’s one big obstacle in their way.

They’re the Browns. 

Thank goodness we don’t root for a team like that

[jgb]

I voted for Browns for pure football reasons but they still have to play in effing Cleveland so there's that...

[Ken Schroy]

2 hours ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

Hypothetically speaking, if the Jets were allowed to swap their players/draft picks/cap situation for the Browns players/draft picks/cap situation, would you do it?  We'd still have Macc/Bowles/Woody and Chris Johnson, etc. 

The Browns have Tyrod at QB right now but they'll have their pick of QBs.  They can also trade down if they want to and get a bounty for that.  Heck, they can probably take a QB at #1 and still get a bounty for #4. 

So which team is better set up for the future?

Its a tie.

[JohnnyLV]

Browns roster is better than ours right now, and they have a silly amount of draft pick value coming up. They are guaranteed 1 of the 4 QBs AND Barkley if they want to go that way.

We once again swam in place, avoiding playmakers at all costs