Poll: Would you trade next year's 1st rounder to move up to #1 now?

[Dcat]

Would you trade next year's 1st rounder to move up to #1 now?

[Warfish]

No.

[nj meadowlands]

??

[prime21]

Trade up to 1 and get a 2 next year is worth consideration. But they better be pretty dam confident in who they want is the best of the bunch and a big difference from the other 3 guys

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

 

[Dcat]

If Cleveland is enamored with Allen, I could see them being willing.  I wonder how Mac would deal with that possibility.

[Dcat]

Just now, prime21 said:

Trade up to 1 and get a 2 next year is worth consideration. But they better be pretty dam confident in who they want is the best of the bunch.


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

there would be no return pick.  

[Paradis]

1 minute ago, Dcat said:

If Cleveland is enamored with Allen,

Where is this narrative coming from, besides crotchety ass motherfckers who aren't paid to make decisions... Given CLE's struggles at QB -- that's the ONLY team we know won't be taking Allen. 

Mark that one off as Darnold and move on. 

[prime21]

there would be no return pick.  

No return pick then I wouldn’t do it.


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

[Paradis]

4 minutes ago, Dcat said:

Would you trade next year's 1st rounder to move up to #1 now?

And no. I wouldn't. I'm fine with either Rosen or Mayfield. We've made our bed, I'm going to lie in it happily now. 

[T0mShane]

Eyes on the prize. It’s still more likely than not that Bowles is fired after next season. Keeping that number one, along with the $100 mil cap space and (presumably) young QB is what you’re selling to the next coach and/or GM.

[Thai Jet]

1 minute ago, prime21 said:

No return pick then I wouldn’t do it.


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

HELL NO !

[Grandy]

I'd be up for it just to guarantee we get a Darnold, or Rosen. The thing is we most likely get one anyway..... so no.

[MDL_JET]

Nah I’m good. Stay put. Roll with one of the top 4. Too many uncertainties with all of them to be giving up a future first. 

[nico002]

100% yes. Darnold or bust.

[hawk]

Essentially you would have a move that cost our first, our second in 2018, our first, our second in 2019, and sheldon richardson to move up from #6 for the #1 overall pick and Kearse.  Plus we got production for a year from Kearse.

[jetfan39]

2 minutes ago, nico002 said:

100% yes. Darnold or bust.

he just may, so no, take the one who falls to us and still have our 1st next year,

[SouthernJet]

13 minutes ago, prime21 said:

Trade up to 1 and get a 2 next year is worth consideration. But they better be pretty dam confident in who they want is the best of the bunch and a big difference from the other 3 guys

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

 

ya if they gave up 2019 #1 to move up just 2 spots their better damn well be more picks given to us.

[Beerfish]

Yup for sure I would.  We just gave away 3 2nd rounders to go from 6 to 3.  I'd pay next years one to get the Qb I want the most.  No question at all

 

[Larz]

Browns will want a king's  ransom 

Stick and pick 

[King P]

13 minutes ago, Paradis said:

And no. I wouldn't. I'm fine with either Rosen or Mayfield. We've made our bed, I'm going to lie in it happily now. 

Seeing you without ASJ as your avatar is weird 

[Dcat]

32 minutes ago, Larz said:

Browns will want a king's  ransom 

Stick and pick 

it's a specific hypothetical scenario.  Next years #1 and swap spots with the Browns now. That's it.  No more, no less.

[JoJoTownsell1]

No because we're guaranteed one of the top guys now. Moving up to one only makes things more painful if we pick the wrong guy.

[New York Mick]

**** no

[The Crimson King]

If even one of the 4 QB's were a lock, yes but then Cleveland wouldn't want to trade the pick

The whole top of the draft is one huge crapshoot this year (gonna be interesting)

 

[jetstream23]

Is there a simple poll around here already asking which QB everyone wants first?  I'd assume the broad consensus is on Darnold with a few votes each for the other three.  If there's clearly one guy above all the others (and I'm starting think there is and that Darnold is that guy) then I'd probably say, we've come this far, why not get THE guy.

We tried to suck for Sam and apparently we don't suck hard enough.  Now we've started to trade up.  Now that we're close should the Jets just say, F*** it and push all the chips for 2018 and 2019 to the center of the table.  I'm thinking this poll gets a Yes vote.  What do we have to lose...another Calvin Pryor or Quinton Coples next year?

[TuscanyTile2]

I think if we were planning to do this, the time to do it was when we traded up from #6.  If Darnold is the best prospect though (and I get the impression that he is) then why not.  Basically we'd have no #1 and no #2 this year or next year but that would be it.  We'd still have a lot of money to buy players with and we could try trading down this draft to recoup picks.  

[ChuckkieB]

I would rather have the ability to pick my blue chip QB prospect then letting the teams in front of me dictate who I can pick.

[CanadaSteve]

Is there a way to vote for no, like, 100X?

[Baeton Manning]

Maybe I'm overstating the competence of the worst teams in football or thinking this process is less chaotic than it is. But I have to assume it's an open league secret that the Browns have "their guy" who they're gonna pick and whoever he is, he's 99% off the board.

[David Harris]

I want Rosen. 

Id do almost anything to get him

[Jetsplayer21]

YA let’s give Cleveland 2 top 5 picks again next yr ?

[adb280z]

No.  I can't really rank my top 3.

Darnold

Rosen

Allen

 

[Lupz27]

If it’s for Darnold then **** it yes why not, anyone else nope.