MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 Interesting comment with the "we didn't really talk to" the Giants about the #2 pick. Yet they're not totally locked into #3 spot. Hmmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Maybe they didn't talk to the giants bc they have Rosen and Allen even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, MDL_JET said: Interesting comment with the "we didn't really talk to" the Giants about the #2 pick. Yet they're not totally locked into #3 spot. Hmmmmm If Macc can head fake Browns with a feint for Barkley, who they lust after for #4, and get some cream to move down a spot, then he gets mad props. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: Maybe they didn't talk to the giants bc they have Rosen and Allen even. Or because the convo went something like this... Mac: Hi Dave, this is Mike with the Jet... Dave: No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 If he had a chance to get the number one overall pick and his choice of QB and didn’t pull the trigger because of a 2019 first rounder, then he has to nail whomever he picks at 3 to be a franchise QB and that player will forever be compared to the QB taken at #1. He’s staking his job on the 3rd best QB in this class and I’m not sure that’s the move to make considering he’s made so many missteps in his first three seasons. Guess he only grew one ball and it’s tiny and shriveled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Most interesting tidbit is that he talked to Browns (like we knew) but confirms he didn't talk to Giants... Clearly feels like a "Giants and Jets simply don't trade with each other" thing because there's no other reason that makes sense. Too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 1 minute ago, MDL_JET said: Or because the convo went something like this... Mac: Hi Dave, this is Mike with the Jet... Dave: No. Or, more likely, "not yet." Jints likely to get max value for the pick when they are on the clock. That's when I expect them to make the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, CrazyCarl40 said: If he had a chance to get the number one overall pick and his choice of QB and didn’t pull the trigger because of a 2019 first rounder, then he has to nail whomever he picks at 3 to be a franchise QB and that player will forever be compared to the QB taken at #1. He’s staking his job on the 3rd best QB in this class and I’m not sure that’s the move to make considering he’s made so many missteps in his first three seasons. Guess he only grew one ball and it’s tiny and shriveled. lol way to make a huge assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Jets not working out Darnold privately screams "CLE is locked in 100% on taking him" to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Oh look, confirmation the Jets didn't talk to the Giants. Oh look, people still looking for more complicated explanations than reality: i.e. Giants won't trade with jets nor be seen to help the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munchmemory Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 I miss Idzik's press conferences. Or did they call those cluster fuks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, UntouchableCrew said: Most interesting tidbit is that he talked to Browns (like we knew) but confirms he didn't talk to Giants... Clearly feels like a "Giants and Jets simply don't trade with each other" thing because there's no other reason that makes sense. Too bad. I have a neighbor I wouldn’t lend my tools to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, jgb said: Or, more likely, "not yet." Jints likely to get max value for the pick when they are on the clock. That's when I expect them to make the deal. True. And maybe "get closer and maybe we'll talk". So thats why he's saying he's not locked into 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Warfish said: Oh look, confirmation the Jets didn't talk to the Giants. Oh look, people still looking for more complicated explanations than reality: i.e. Giants won't trade with jets nor be seen to help the Jets. So what's the "not locked into 3" mean? Just throwing around random comments? Even though they can't move any higher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandy Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, MDL_JET said: So what's the "not locked into 3" mean? Just throwing around random comments? Even though they can't move any higher? We still have a #1 next year, and a few other picks. We haven't completely blown the load yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, MDL_JET said: True. And maybe "get closer and maybe we'll talk". So thats why he's saying he's not locked into 3. They could also move down with Browns if Macc sells them on the seriousness of going Barkley. It's a win/win. I expect a "leak" saying Jets seriously considering Barkly. If Browns get spooked and take him at 1, an additional QB on the board. if they go QB, maybe can move down if they believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergen Jet Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Glad Darnold isn't getting a private workout. I'd rather have Rosen or Mayfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, MDL_JET said: So what's the "not locked into 3" mean? Just throwing around random comments? Even though they can't move any higher? It means if the draft goes utterly sideways, and they decide they really don't want to draft Player X at three, they can always trade down. You think he's talking about trading up? To a Giants team he didn't even bother to present the deal he gave to Indy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, jgb said: They could also move down with Browns if Macc sells them on the seriousness of going Barkley. It's a gambit. Can't push it too hard too soon of Browns may bite and take him at 1. Gotta slow play it to work. I just can't see that ever working lol. I said before if I were the Browns id say "go ahead and draft him" "well enjoy Darnold...good luck". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 18 minutes ago, MDL_JET said: Assuming this means that Darnold is going #1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Just now, MDL_JET said: I just can't see that ever working lol. I said before if I were the Browns id say "go ahead and draft him" "well enjoy Darnold...good luck". sorry you caught me editing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Warfish said: It means if the draft goes utterly sideways, and they decide they really don't want to draft Player X at three, they can always trade down. You think he's talking about trading up? To a Giants team he didn't even bother to present the deal he gave to Indy? I almost wish they swapped with the Giants just to spite you Fish. I hate how you're so confident about this lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, MDL_JET said: I almost wish they swapped with the Giants just to spite you Fish. I hate how you're so confident about this lol. Gettleman doesn't care about Jets. He has to realize he get move down to 3 and get who he wants. Just waiting for the moment to maximize value. Would be shocked if they don't move down (maybe even lower than 3) and get their guard or Barkley later. Bills scare me here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 “Didn’t really” talk to Giants. .... that means something to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 20 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: Maybe they didn't talk to the giants bc they have Rosen and Allen even. That would make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Not working out Darnold means they dont believe Darnold will be there at 3. That correlates with the information that the Giants consider Sam Darnold the only QB they would be willing to draft at 2. They believe that Darnold is not getting past 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 14 minutes ago, nycdan said: Jets not working out Darnold privately screams "CLE is locked in 100% on taking him" to me. I agree , it's a logical conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Werblin Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 7 minutes ago, CTM said: Assuming this means that Darnold is going #1? And it not, word is he is the only QB the Giants would take at 2. Perhaps the Giants are waiting to discuss trades for the #2 until after the Browns pick just in case those silly Browns take a player other than Darnold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 Yeah, they think Darnold is going 1 and if he doesn't he's a lock to go 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 14 minutes ago, MDL_JET said: So what's the "not locked into 3" mean? Just throwing around random comments? Even though they can't move any higher? Or could it mean he'd move lower ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Werblin Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 25 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: Maybe they didn't talk to the giants bc they have Rosen and Allen even. Or Rosen and Mayfield even Or Mayfield and Allen even Or they feel pretty confident that the Giants are not taking a QB and will not be trading out of #2 Or Mac just doesn't have the Giants' phone number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, UntouchableCrew said: Yeah, they think Darnold is going 1 and if he doesn't he's a lock to go 2. Exactly. There's no way Darnold's there at #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeptable Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, Thai Jet said: Or could it mean he'd move lower ? I bet if Rosen and Darnold are gone he might consider trading down, at least hear the offers. If its something amazing why not and draft a jackson later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Werblin Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Thai Jet said: Or could it mean he'd move lower ? I do believe that if Rosen and Darnold are no longer available the Jets will shop the pick because spending a #3 on Mayfiled, Allen or Jackson is a stretch. I could even see them selecting Chubb and using next years #1 + some to trade back into the first round to get a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.