Jump to content

The Wizard of Oz, A Wizard's Nightmare...GAME THREAD


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Nynaeve said:

No offense or anything. I just dont really believe in giving any type of hints about the setup via flavor so I tend to either not read, or if I do, I dont usually factor it into my musings.

Balance wise it made more sense to me for there to be 3 scum and a SK, based soley on numbers. Though I guess all the town PRs might have balanced things out. Unsure.

No offense at all. But serious question does anybody agree w/ this? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HessStation said:

No offense at all. But serious question does anybody agree w/ this? 

 

It really doesnt matter. I'm not trying to make you question yourself. I was just explaining why I assumed what I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nynaeve said:

It really doesnt matter. I'm not trying to make you question yourself. I was just explaining why I assumed what I did.

No not at all, but I think it's important for future games. Scum should be 25-33% of the game, pending 3rd party. 

Thats isually how it works. For your benefit too...and everyone's. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pac said:

Lol..  whadda u think?

I said serious question. I don't think Nyn's thinking is right based on numbers. Your thoughts? 

It doesn't bother me at all. I had Doggin approve so I'm good, but only 3 Scum and 1 SK in game of 17, seems awfully low for scum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say 5 is right for 20 players. But i get lost with the balancing of all the prs so if the town prs give town an edge then maybe it balances out.

I just feel like short of scum and sk shooting each other... it was a hard game to win for town, even with my vigs and crusher getting peeked and protected correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HessStation said:

I said serious question. I don't think Nyn's thinking is right based on numbers. Your thoughts? 

It doesn't bother me at all. I had Doggin approve so I'm good, but only 3 Scum and 1 SK in game of 17, seems awfully low for scum

It really depends on how powered the town is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HessStation said:

I said serious question. I don't think Nyn's thinking is right based on numbers. Your thoughts? 

It doesn't bother me at all. I had Doggin approve so I'm good, but only 3 Scum and 1 SK in game of 17, seems awfully low for scum

Mafia 101 says 4 scum in a 16 person game for a 25 percent ratio..  17 naturally meant 4 scum and a sk.  Flavor gave away characters.

Think those who don't look for clues from mod are missing the boat.  I pack clues in scenes and mini scenes when I mod.

 

  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Pac said:

Mafia 101 says 4 scum in a 16 person game for a 25 percent ratio..  17 naturally meant 4 scum and a sk.  Flavor gave away characters.

Think those who don't look for clues from mod are missing the boat.  I pack clues in scenes and mini scenes when I mod.

 

4 none town for 16 players.

Adding a sk makes it 5 none town to 16 players. Hence my comment.

What you say would be accurate if there wasnt a sk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Verbal said:

It really depends on how powered the town is. 

 

15 minutes ago, Pac said:

Mafia 101 says 4 scum in a 16 person game for a 25 percent ratio..  17 naturally meant 4 scum and a sk.  Flavor gave away characters.

Think those who don't look for clues from mod are missing the boat.  I pack clues in scenes and mini scenes when I mod.

 

Yep. I'd like to think all sides being so powered up this game the roles cancelled each other out. Everyone wants a pr to make it more fun but with that, it sets up a thousand different potential scenarios and outcomes. The game could have been over just as quickly for either side. Luckily it worked out well with each side have more than a lot of chances to still win at end game. Even Nol had a chance if he had a better FR and a couple things broke right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nynaeve said:

4 none town for 16 players.

Adding a sk makes it 5 none town to 16 players. Hence my comment.

What you say would be accurate if there wasnt a sk 

I'm wondering what the consensus is on this. I don't know for sure but always considered 3rd party separate to the rule of 3:1 ratio. You're the first person I've heard that considers 3rd party part of the equation. Not saying you're wrong just always considered otherwise. Per basic set up not including PR balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HessStation said:

I'm wondering what the consensus is on this. I don't know for sure but always considered 3rd party separate to the rule of 3:1 ratio. You're the first person I've heard that considers 3rd party part of the equation. Not saying you're wrong just always considered otherwise. Per basic set up not including PR balance.

I dont think there's really wrong or right cause there are so many combinations and ways you can balance it via PR power. 

I'm no expert with balance. I always consult in my games. Or mostly freak out and Clov tells me what I should do lol

  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nynaeve said:

I dont think there's really wrong or right cause there are so many combinations and ways you can balance it via PR power. 

I'm no expert with balance. I always consult in my games. Or mostly freak out and Clov tells me what I should do lol

Yeah, I think you would just consider a SK part of the ratio and I wouldn't. Obv PRs can change things. But to your point no wrong/right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Verbal said:

Each mod has their preferences and I think we've done this enough at this point to have 'reasonably' balanced games, so it's all good.

Balance is never a priority in my games.  And that's one of many reasons why I shouldn't ever be allowed to Mod. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/16/2018 at 1:57 PM, CTM said:

no, i say pingy because you are introducing a narrative, ape coaching brick.. that isn't supported by much 

what happened to this ping @CTM?

this is something i hadn't caught until reading back here, now that i'm finally on my laptop.

this is the type of nuanced sh*t i feel scum does (FYI this was a reply you made to Stark)

  • Thumb Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...