NYallDay Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge4Tide Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Raiders have said no real quick to any team acquiring about K Mack. The Raiders aren't trading Khalil Mack this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 It’s not happening. We’d have to give them too much and our team isn’t ready for that type of “all in move”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepPep Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Trading for Fowler is a mistake. Trading for Mack would be a great move but would cost the Jets a TON. Draft capital they simply don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Just now, Raideraholic said: Raiders have said no real quick to any team acquiring about K Mack. The Raiders aren't trading Khalil Mack this year. Well then sign em’ and stop tempting everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Losmeister Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 K2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYallDay Posted August 21, 2018 Author Share Posted August 21, 2018 Well, like I said, this was reported by dipietro and canty. But if possible, it would have to be tried atleast. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 25 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: Well then sign em’ and stop tempting everyone. They will sign him when it's beneficial to them, to sign him longterm.( Vegas- no state tax) K Mack under contract this year( fifth year option) ,and they can use franchise tag on him for two years after that. ( way cheaper than what he's looking for now) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Just now, Raideraholic said: They will sign him when it's beneficial to them, to sign him longterm.( Vegas- no state tax) K Mack under contract this year( fifth year option) ,and they can use franchise tag on him for two years after that. ( way cheaper than what he's looking for now) I said this about Revis and then you know the rest. Btw I don’t think he’ll be franchised twice. That’s more of a pipe dream than him getting traded to us. The money will go up massively being that he is a Pass Rusher. Gruden and KM haven’t even spoken yet. Gruden is ruining your team before he even coaches a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 44 minutes ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Nice thought but I agree with the others here : We simply can't afford the draft capital it would take to get Mack. If we were a contender and close then maybe, but not now. We need those picks to fill some holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 It's a false report. The Jets would be crazy anyway to trade Teddy Bridgewater for an underperforming edge rusher like Fowler Jr. Don't get me wrong, Fowler Jr. would be a good guy for the Jets to go after at the right price, he's young, and has upside, but he has not live up to expectations. They are better off holding off on trading TB until a team is desperate for a QB and might give up a good draft pick for him. The Jags are a potential fit for TB. But they would have to give up more than Fowler Jr. IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 15 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: I said this about Revis and then you know the rest. Btw I don’t think he’ll be franchised twice. That’s more of a pipe dream than him getting traded to us. The money will go up massively being that he is a Pass Rusher. Gruden and KM haven’t even spoken yet. Gruden is ruining your team before he even coaches a game. No they franchise him twice will still come out less per year than he's looking for. ( fact) The Raiders will sign K Mack to longterm deal at some point this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR24 Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 100% not gonna happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Maybe our strategy now is to trade for all the pass rushers in the NFL in an effort to reduce our own offensive line's vulnerability to other teams' passrush! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Just now, Raideraholic said: No they franchise him twice will still come out less per year than he's looking for. ( fact) The Raiders will sign K Mack to longterm deal at some point this year. But you do realize that the cap hit of a 2nd year franchise tag will eat up more than 70% of that current year’s cap space...right? A contract will space out over the years. Franchise tags(and especially a 2nd franchise tag) is going to destroy the cap for the year you place it on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR24 Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Khalil Mack is definitely a game changer but sending atleast 1 first rounder and god knows what else and then signing him for $20Mil/Yr is a tough pill to swallow. I'll pass and hope he hits free agency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 58 minutes ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 59 minutes ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Lol I posted this exact scenario a few hours ago, and yes it was in the form of pipe dream scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, ScarletKnight89 said: It's a false report. The Jets would be crazy anyway to trade Teddy Bridgewater for an underperforming edge rusher like Fowler Jr. Don't get me wrong, Fowler Jr. would be a good guy for the Jets to go after at the right price, he's young, and has upside, but he has not live up to expectations. They are better off holding off on trading TB until a team is desperate for a QB and might give up a good draft pick for him. The Jags are a potential fit for TB. But they would have to give up more than Fowler Jr. IMO. 8 sack season in his second year of playing with 2 sacks in the playoff rounds. Pretty good. Think it’s nothing but up for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Both sides want to wait and see Probably a month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 Trading for Fowler is a mistake. Trading for Mack would be a great move but would cost the Jets a TON. Draft capital they simply don't have. Right. I’m looking for the jets to spend most of that draft capital on a friggin offense for once. A blue chip wr and a batch of o line beef would be a welcome change and desperately needed! Enough with the big name d guys. Let’s out score the other team. Let the devitos and pouhas of the world man the d Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 The days of John Abraham are long gone. I dream of a 5 sack player let alone a yearly double digit one. We had the least amount of sacks last year of all NFL teams. Getting an Edge Rusher is a major priority. Macks a pipe dream. Fowler for a 4th or FA next off season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 3 hours ago, NYallDay said: Heard this on ESPN radio this morning... trading TB to Jacksonville (maybe filler needed) for Fowler and then spend some draft capital (may be a steep price) but trade for Mack... possible, pipe dreamish, but possible ... thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The Mack part is crack'ish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted August 21, 2018 Share Posted August 21, 2018 3 hours ago, PepPep said: Trading for Fowler is a mistake. Depends on the cost as the Jets would have to decide on signing him soon after. The guy had 10 sacks last year, is young, and could fill a glaring hole. The only reason I don't trade Teddy for him is if: A) He's (Fowler) just a total douche. b) A young talented O'lineman could be had for a similar price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.