Jump to content
Rhg1084

Jets job is the most desired job this offseason

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, section314 said:

The Packers 4TH? Waste of time.

Did you look at the factors considered or just went "Oooh, Aaron Rodgers!!! Must be the best job."

Cap space. Franchise that rarely makes big plays in free agency. Young QB that you can mold vs vet QB that will get you fired if you don't do things his way. Having to deal with the Bears and Vikings the next few  years. Expectation level. 
 

No one is saying the Packers job isn't a good one, but it isn't quite as obvious as some think. If you go the Packers and go 10-6 and lose in the first round it's considered a disaster with Rodgers. If you go 10-6 and make the playoffs with Darnold next year the fanbase will build you a statute.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Rhg1084 said:

I mean Rodgers is 35 years old and that roster is exactly oozing with talent. How many rookies have they started this year?

Not to mention they are a distant 3rd, in terms of talent, in their own division. Not a great combo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Dcat said:

Hahaha.... this list is idiotic.  This is nothing but one moron's subjective opinion.  Obviously has no knowledge of how badly the Johnsons do things.  The one thing he is right about though, is that the Johnsons place HC above GM in importance by having both GM and HC report to them.  So a potential HC might like not having to report to a GM.  Johnsons give HC an inordinate amount of say, particularly in player acquisition and the draft. We've seen that for well over a decade.  WIth only 2 out of 12 1st round picks being used on offense (Sanchez & Darnold). No coincidence that the HCs during this insane 1st round "always pick defense" were all defensive headcoaches who were uninterested inoffense.    Headcoach obviously gets priority over GM for round 1.  Otherwise why have all the 1st round picks (except Sanchez and Darnold) been defensive players?  It's flat out crazy.

It's amazing how angry some of you get when people are optimistic about the Jets future.

And yeah, it's subjective. How can it not be? 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Warfish said:

Our owner is fine, they will spend $$ and don't interfere as much as tin foil hat fans think.

We have a massive amount of cap space.

We have a potential Franchise QB in his second year in Darnold.

We have decent amount of (generally under-performing) talent on Defense.

Macc is not a pro. 

Anderson is not a con per se, but he's not a huge pro either.  He's a #3 WR in any decently talented O-skill group, and he may be that for us in our future.

With all that said, that list is total BS, one guys misguided opinions. 

There are 3 teams all of which have better spots for a potential Head Coach than NY (Ravens, Packers and Browns).  A 4th place position would be more accurate (IMO).

But sure, hype hype, at least we're finally #1 on some kind of list, amirite?

Ravens "Franchise QB" is a RB. 

Packers Franchise QB is 35 and the talent on the team is 3rd best in it's own division with middling cap space and a less than ideal landing spot for Free Agents. 

Browns are arguably in a better spot. But you do realize that this list is subjective and if you think Darnold is going to be the better QB, it's not crazy to like the Jets future better than the Browns. 

Again, this list is subjective because all of these lists are going to be subjective. It's just funny how angry some of you get when people are optimistic about the Jets future. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Warfish said:

You can be optimistic without engaging in unfounded hyperbole.

Our job is a good job, not the best, not the worst.  And that's ok.

It's also OK for one "expert" to rank the Jets #1 without it ruining your day. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, RutgersJetFan said:

You’re right. Everything has been just great.

Has been just great? You do realize this is a discussion about how good  this job is going forward with Darnold/current young players/cap space etc..? 

It's amazing how blinded some of you are by your hate  that you refuse to even properly grasp the context of Chad Forbes argument. It has NOTHING to do with how things have been under Bowles it's how it looks GOING FORWARD. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bocajetfan said:

Looking at the list I would rate Jets and Browns as 1A and 1B depending on the priorities of any prospective coach. Ravens could be rated higher but I see them extending Harbaugh. The list is not as far fetched as some believe. Yes all this is subjective 

Ravens have more overall talent. That is without question, but if you are a offensive minded Head Coach do you want a QB that is best suited for the triple option than a west coast/spread offense? 

Lamar Jackson can win you games with his legs, but he can't throw and is not as big as Cam and pretty susceptible to an injury running the ball 15 times a game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bgivs21 said:

We'll find out a lot about Jackson this weekend (& the following weekend if they make it to the playoffs). 

I don't think we will find out anything about him that we don't already know. He may be the best running QB of all time. He is a great playmaker...with his legs. If you watch him throw the ball, it's ugly. He misses wide open WRs. He can't go through progressions. But he can 100pct win games in the NFL with a great defense and his legs. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said:

News, you say?

positive Jets analysis........better? 

I should really hire an editor for all my forum posts because god forbid I misuse a word here and there.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Miss Lonelyhearts said:

When people are optimistic for no reason there’s no incentive to give them a reason. You are why the Jets will always be bad.

Agreed, it's just idiotic to be optimistic about Sam Darnold leading the Jets into the future. There is clearly NO reason to be optimistic about this team and it's future. Why can't more posters be depressingly pessimistic? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...