Jump to content

Well here is a mock most of you will like


More Cowbell

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, More Cowbell said:

Link

Don't agree the second pick would go this way if this was to happen. I think we would go WR. 

That's a real surplus of Williams.  Hiring a Gregg, already having a Leo, drafting a Jonah.  Why not be greedy and get a CB I guess?!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gastineau Lives said:

I haven't clicked the link yet, is it a mock draft where we trade down a few dozen times and draft the entire sixth round? Guessing by thread title here...

First Round mock only.  Trade down with Giants to get their two 1st rounders.

I would absolutely do that....but not getting an Edge Rusher with either pick is complete Fail to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them getting back our 3rd and 4th rounder for their 2 firsts and our first (Giants get Nos. 3, 68 and 105). No, not a good trade at all. We can't have the whole draft blown up to get a LT and CB still leaving more major holes at Edge rusher and Center that we likely then would not get in this draft with that trade. If Mac makes that trade he definitely wants to get fired.

Heck we gave three 2nd rounders and our 6th overall pick to get a QB and they can give equal. We get their 6th, 17th and 2nd rounders all this year for them to move up 3 spots. As it is moving down to 6 will be we lose out on all three blue chip defenders since 5 spots in front of us with 2 QBs coming off the board 99% chance likely means that Bosa, Willians, and Allen, will all be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the mock but I don't see the Giants trading up. Just like the Jets had a list of QBs they would of taken at 3 I see the Giants having a list that also includes Josh Rosen and one of their guys will be available at 6. No need to trade up. Hope Im wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants have a million needs and literally no one seems to think Haskins is all that good. I’m of the belief that they’d trade their second for Rosen and let Eli have his retirement run this year, then roll into 2020 with Rosen and Barkley, which could be fine depending on how they fill in around them in this draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lith said:

So, they have us trading back, but coming away with even fewer picks than we have now. 

3 for 6 & 17 I would do.  But not adding our 3rd and 4th rounders.

Agreed....sure the points work out, 2,534 given up by the Jets vs. 2,550 given back by the Giants.

But you pay a PREMIUM to move up and grab a QB, especially, under this scenario, the Giants want Haskins and think the Raiders are going to take him at the #4 spot. 

If the Giants want to move up, they better give up both 1st rounders and not expect anything back.

Or, I'll take the #6 pick, the Giants 2nd rounder, throw in a 4th or a 5th and next years 2nd rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, T0mShane said:

Giants have a million needs and literally no one seems to think Haskins is all that good. I’m of the belief that they’d trade their second for Rosen and let Eli have his retirement run this year, then roll into 2020 with Rosen and Barkley, which could be fine depending on how they fill in around them in this draft

There's no way the giants pass on Darnold to draft a RB. Never gonna happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, T0mShane said:

Giants have a million needs and literally no one seems to think Haskins is all that good. I’m of the belief that they’d trade their second for Rosen and let Eli have his retirement run this year, then roll into 2020 with Rosen and Barkley, which could be fine depending on how they fill in around them in this draft

I think this is what's going to happen as well if for no other reason than to ensure that Giants get to retaliate against the Jets fans who mocked them for taking Barkley by saying - "SEE?????  We took Barkley instead of a QB and got the best damn QB. in that draft anyway!"   

The football Gods (anti-Jets fans for sure) will make this so.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said:

I haven't clicked the link yet, is it a mock draft where we trade down a few dozen times and draft the entire sixth round? Guessing by thread title here...

Edit: Oh no, it's worse.

 

22 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

First Round mock only.  Trade down with Giants to get their two 1st rounders.

I would absolutely do that....but not getting an Edge Rusher with either pick is complete Fail to me.

 

21 minutes ago, UnknownJetFan said:

Them getting back our 3rd and 4th rounder for their 2 firsts and our first (Giants get Nos. 3, 68 and 105). No, not a good trade at all. We can't have the whole draft blown up to get a LT and CB still leaving more major holes at Edge rusher and Center that we likely then would not get in this draft with that trade. If Mac makes that trade he definitely wants to get fired.

 

16 minutes ago, BroadwayRay said:

I don't like it. I would have taken Brian Burns with pick #17.

 

16 minutes ago, Lith said:

So, they have us trading back, but coming away with even fewer picks than we have now. 

3 for 6 & 17 I would do.  But not adding our 3rd and 4th rounders.

 

8 minutes ago, CanadaSteve said:

First off, that is one of the WORSE trade proposals I have ever seen.  If anything we would get the other 1st outright for the trade up, not including our picks.

Second, the two picks in the first: no thanks.

 

8 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said:

In this draft we could have taken Q and Dillard. 

 

8 minutes ago, IndianaJet said:

Agreed....sure the points work out, 2,534 given up by the Jets vs. 2,550 given back by the Giants.

But you pay a PREMIUM to move up and grab a QB, especially, under this scenario, the Giants want Haskins and think the Raiders are going to take him at the #4 spot. 

If the Giants want to move up, they better give up both 1st rounders and not expect anything back.

Or, I'll take the #6 pick, the Giants 2nd rounder, throw in a 4th or a 5th and next years 2nd rounder.

 

7 minutes ago, FlightBoyz said:

Stand pat and draft Josh Allen. This guy will be stud in GWs system. 

 

Someone needs to change the thread title to "Well here is a mock none of you will like".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Beachum is that bad, to the point we have to reach for a LT, who half the scouts say would be better suited to be a guard. We can wait a year to address the LT position. Failing to draft an impact rusher in this draft, especially, would be unforgivable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ChuckkieB said:

I think this is what's going to happen as well if for no other reason than to ensure that Giants get to retaliate against the Jets fans who mocked them for taking Barkley by saying - "SEE?????  We took Barkley instead of a QB and got the best damn QB. in that draft anyway!"   

The football Gods (anti-Jets fans for sure) will make this so.  

 

I agree.  I almost want the giants to NOT get Haskins as much as I want Jets to get Bosa/Allen.  Them getting Haskins AND still having Saquon?  MY God, we'd never hear the end of it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MindOverMatter said:

Selecting Jonah Williams after trading back to 6 would be legit but not with Quinnen still on the board, I'd even take Oliver and than Dillard or Ford @ 17.

The Jets traded back from 3 to 6 and got another 1st Round pick.  I like that.  But...

- Leaving the best player on the board in Q. Williams

- Not getting an Edge Rusher with either pick

- Taking an OT who some people believe will be an OG (and leaving a true LT like Jawaan Taylor on the board)

....those are potentially crippling decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said:

In this draft we could have taken Q and Dillard. 

I think the trade value is horrible.  Why are we throwing picks into the deal?  I'd take the Giants' two #1s, but no way I'm throwing extra picks into the deal from our end.

Plus, if the board fell the way it does in this mock, I'd go Quinnen Williams (or possibly Jawaan Taylor) with the first pick, and Brian Burns with the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Our first mock trade. The Giants send the No. 6 and No. 17 (which they got in the OBJ trade) to the Jets for Nos. 3, 68 and 105. They then beat the Raiders to the punch by taking Dwayne Haskins, filling the budgets for New York newspaper editors for the next eight months.

Crap deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

The Jets traded back from 3 to 6 and got another 1st Round pick.  I like that.  But...

- Leaving the best player on the board in Q. Williams

- Not getting an Edge Rusher with either pick

- Taking an OT who some people believe will be an OG (and leaving a true LT like Jawaan Taylor on the board)

....those are potentially crippling decisions.

Agreed. But I can see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on how this Draft fell the Jets could have also done any of the following....

1.  BPA in Quinnen Williams at 6,  LT Andre Dillard at 17

2. LT Jawaan Taylor at 6,  Edge Rusher Brian Burns at 17

3. Full DEFENSE ->  Quinnen Williams and Greedy Williams

4. Full OFFENSE ->  Jawaan Taylor and WR N'Keal Harry

5. Trade back again from #6 for a huge haul given that the #1 player on many team's Draft Boards (Q. Williams) is still there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...