Jump to content
choon328

Draft Trade Rumors

Recommended Posts

oakland has no 3rd so we would be looking for their 2nd rounder to move down.  I like the ideas of trading down twice if possible.  Even if not if we walk away with Oliver or Allen and a 2nd rounder it would be a big win.

  • Upvote 3
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, SR24 said:

Were gonna give a division rival the best player in the draft for a few picks our GM will probably whiff on? I was fine with trading with Washington or someone else but wtf is this 

We "survived" Marcel Dareus.. N. Suh... we'll be OK. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JiF said:

That's interesting.  Wonder what else is involved.  If this is legit, who are the Jets targeting?  They're probably comfortable with all of the above; Bosa, Q. Will, Allen, Oliver.  Or, the Raiders want a QB and the Jets are comfortable with 3 of those 4, I'd assume.

 

Would be great if QB was their guy...then let Bills come to 4. We're not that lucky.😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said:

 

For Rodney Hudson.

I’ve been saying this since “missing out” on Paradis. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching humble nice college kids getting interviewed and within 2 or 3 years in the NFL they often become money grubbing petulant aholes.  Same as in basketball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jetsbb said:

We can all thank Bowles for sucking at his job to put us in this position.

If he would have sucked a bit better vs Buffalo we would have had the #1 pick if I recall.  😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Beerfish said:

oakland has no 3rd so we would be looking for their 2nd rounder to move down.  I like the ideas of trading down twice if possible.  Even if not if we walk away with Oliver or Allen and a 2nd rounder it would be a big win.

That's a dream scenario and exactly what i'd do. Trade down again after that if you can and just keep racking up picks. And hopefully a future 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TheGoose said:

For Rodney Hudson.

I’ve been saying this since “missing out” on Paradis. 

Love Hudson but he's 29. Hard pass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A trade with the Raiders should be simple; #3 for #4 and #35.  With that Mac can get the same guy he wanted at #3 and have a very high second round pick.  Or he could package the #4 for the Redskins (#15 and #45) or the Bengals (#11 and #42).  Both trades would have to include a 2020 very high pick.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BettyBoop said:

A trade with the Raiders should be simple; #3 for #4 and #35.  With that Mac can get the same guy he wanted at #3 and have a very high second round pick.  Or he could package the #4 for the Redskins (#15 and #45) or the Bengals (#11 and #42).  Both trades would have to include a 2020 very high pick.

#3 and #68 for #4 and #27 is actually like 30 points off on the value chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sammybighead said:

Love Hudson but he's 29. Hard pass

According to PFF he was the 4th best Center in the NFL, and he has experience playing next to our new LG. 

Mangold retired at 35? And had three pro-bowls from his age 29 season forward. 

This would be a BRILLIANT move!!    

...or If anything, a soft pass. Saying it’s a “hard pass”?!

Lol....he’s not in a wheelchair, he doesn’t drug or DV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Paradis said:

We "survived" Marcel Dareus.. N. Suh... we'll be OK. 

I just can’t get on board with it. Hopefully we find a better deal

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SR24 said:

#3 and #68 for #4 and #27 is actually like 30 points off on the value chart

I would sign off on that one!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, JiF said:

That's interesting.  Wonder what else is involved.  If this is legit, who are the Jets targeting?  They're probably comfortable with all of the above; Bosa, Q. Will, Allen, Oliver.  Or, the Raiders want a QB and the Jets are comfortable with 3 of those 4, I'd assume.

 

Or that's just the first trade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, BettyBoop said:

A trade with the Raiders should be simple; #3 for #4 and #35.  With that Mac can get the same guy he wanted at #3 and have a very high second round pick.  Or he could package the #4 for the Redskins (#15 and #45) or the Bengals (#11 and #42).  Both trades would have to include a 2020 very high pick.

horrible, you cant trade out of 3 without a first rounder next year plus this year. 

  • Confused 2
  • Butt Fumble 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, choon328 said:

Or that's just the first trade

Now we're just giving Mac too much credit! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, TheGoose said:

For Rodney Hudson.

I’ve been saying this since “missing out” on Paradis. 

In a lot of ways @Paradis has always been with us.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, JiF said:

That's interesting.  Wonder what else is involved.  If this is legit, who are the Jets targeting?  They're probably comfortable with all of the above; Bosa, Q. Will, Allen, Oliver.  Or, the Raiders want a QB and the Jets are comfortable with 3 of those 4, I'd assume.

 

Why would they dump down one spot for minimal return to allow the Raiders to secure a QB that other teams are trying to trade up for, which would allow the Raiders to then trade Derek Carr for a haul? The Jets would look like fools and for what? A measly two? **** that. If they’re trading 3, it better be for a massive return of picks.

  • Upvote 2
  • Butt Fumble 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

Why would they dump down one spot for minimal return to allow the Raiders to secure a QB that other teams are trying to trade up for, which would allow the Raiders to then trade Derek Carr for a haul? The Jets would look like fools and for what? A measly two? **** that. If they’re trading 3, it better be for a massive return of picks.

Who cares? If we pick up an extra pick and still get the guy we want, that's the best case. I couldn't give a damn what the raiders do after that.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Paradis said:

We "survived" Marcel Dareus.. N. Suh... we'll be OK. 

Q could knock the heads off the Pats and Dolphins QBs as well... not just ours. A win win. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

Why would they dump down one spot for minimal return to allow the Raiders to secure a QB that other teams are trying to trade up for, which would allow the Raiders to then trade Derek Carr for a haul? The Jets would look like fools and for what? A measly two? **** that. If they’re trading 3, it better be for a massive return of picks.

If the Bills rumors are true and they want Quinnen. The only way I trade with Oakland is if they're taking a QB which would leave Quinnen on the board at #4. The same trade can be made with the Bills or Bengals, who I also think want Quinnen, at 4. If Macc got that done I would be a happy man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sammybighead said:

Who cares? If we pick up an extra pick and still get the guy we want, that's the best case. I couldn't give a damn what the raiders do after that.

Agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

Why would they dump down one spot for minimal return to allow the Raiders to secure a QB that other teams are trying to trade up for, which would allow the Raiders to then trade Derek Carr for a haul? The Jets would look like fools and for what? A measly two? **** that. If they’re trading 3, it better be for a massive return of picks.

Fools? They would be getting a top of the second round pick for basically nothing. They could go ahead and pick one of the blue chippers or trade down again. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sammybighead said:

Who cares? If we pick up an extra pick and still get the guy we want, that's the best case. I couldn't give a damn what the raiders do after that.

I think the Jets want to accumulate picks so a trade with the Raiders would just be the beginning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, choon328 said:

If the Bills rumors are true and they want Quinnen. The only way I trade with Oakland is if they're taking a QB which would leave Quinnen on the board at #4. The same trade can be made with the Bills or Bengals, who I also think want Quinnen, at 4. If Macc got that done I would be a happy man

That’d be a lot to expect of Maccagnan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

That’d be a lot to expect of Maccagnan.

I have a feeling that's the plan. We'll see though

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

Why would they dump down one spot for minimal return to allow the Raiders to secure a QB that other teams are trying to trade up for, which would allow the Raiders to then trade Derek Carr for a haul? The Jets would look like fools and for what? A measly two? **** that. If they’re trading 3, it better be for a massive return of picks.

You would think they're getting better offers, for sure.  

Though, I wouldnt hate the idea of Ed Oliver at 4 and getting their 2.35 l and maybe they're 4.100.  Just the 2.35 would be hard to swallow.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...