Warfish Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 39 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: So you want to force 2nd/3rd round talent into our pick in the first, and your justification for that is, let me guess, the draft is a crapshoot and who knows how they'll turn out? People keep using the word "force", I don't think it means in this context what you think it means. We'll do it one more time: I want to trade down. i.e. I wish to exchange the #3 pick for a slightly lower first round pick and a number of other picks, including at least one decent 2nd Rounder and one decent 3rd rounder in 2019 and a 2020 pick. A reasonable haul depending on how it plays out. With the newfound picks, I want to select the TE Hockenson (1st). The Center Bradbury (2nd). And more in the 3rd (I can be flexible here). Hockenson is a legitimate upper 1st round talent. Bradbury is a vital need and a legitimate 2nd round talent. There are not Hackenberg or Shepard type reach picks. I believe Hockenson + Bradbury + a 3rd Round Pick + A Pick in 2020 > Picking any of the single three Defenders at #3 If you think this is "forcing" something, so be it, we can agree to disagree. I don't see the problem. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Lonelyhearts Posted April 25, 2019 Share Posted April 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Warfish said: Hockenson is a legitimate upper 1st round talent. Bradbury is a vital need and a legitimate 2nd round talent. There are not Hackenberg or Shepard type reach picks. Off in the wrong direction. I have Hockenson 6 and Bradbury 22. I don't think you're getting those two and two picks for 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.