Jet Nut Posted May 13, 2019 Author Share Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, jamesr said: Not necessarily. There's a great quote from The Producers that sums this one up, for me at least: You can actually do your best to fail and still end up succeeding, Not suggesting Macc is doing this on purpose, but if it works does it become a blueprint for other teams to follow? Sounds good except I was answering someone who said if they go 9-7 it's because of the players. The players that were drafted by Macc. The situation doesn't fit. I would bet against the idea that if the Jets go 9-7, 10-6, 11-4 that Macc and Gase don't get tons of props and no one is saying Macc had nothing to do with it. Especially try to make it out to be a situation where he did his best to fail and somehow found. success. 9-7, 10-6, 11-4 and I could care less who doesn't give either credit. There will be some that whine even with any of those win totals for 2019. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 13, 2019 Author Share Posted May 13, 2019 51 minutes ago, playtowinthegame said: 10 wins and no playoffs = 2015 Sorry, I'm NOT celebrating another season without the Jets making the playoffs. It likely means the Jets didn't have a good enough record in their division and their conference for them to not get a wild card spot with 10 wins. Still, you go ahead and pat the Jets on the back for 10 wins and no playoffs after you finished watching the Bills with nothing to play for beat the Jets in week 17. Groundhogs Day! Who cares about 2015. Has nothing to do with it. We go from 4 wins to 10 and you're whining that we didn't make the playoffs you'll sound clueless. It's not a fluke trip to the playoffs, it's how they play. Are they improving and the talent there and developing. To get all that worked up about playoffs and make fun of anyone who's ok with the 10 wins. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 22 hours ago, Jet Nut said: Or both? Both, macc put a talented team together and Gase for coaching them up. Remember, macc didn't hire Bowles so while we have plenty to complain about now he gets a chance to have his players coaches by a competent HC. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Cowbell Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 I don't see a clear answer here. If we win because Darnold is lighting it up and Bell is running wild, Mac and Gase would both get the credit. If we are winning because the D is suffocating the other teams, Mac and CJ get credit for bringing in William's. If we are winning purely on smart play design by getting the most out of players like Anderson, Q, Herndon, or anyone that doesn't normally play a major role, then Gase gets the credit It all depends how we win these games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 13, 2019 Author Share Posted May 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, More Cowbell said: I don't see a clear answer here. If we win because Darnold is lighting it up and Bell is running wild, Mac and Gase would both get the credit. If we are winning because the D is suffocating the other teams, Mac and CJ get credit for bringing in William's. If we are winning purely on smart play design by getting the most out of players like Anderson, Q, Herndon, or anyone that doesn't normally play a major role, then Gase gets the credit It all depends how we win these games. Anderson, Q, Herndon were brought in by who? Two of them are already favorites. How do you not give Macc at least a part of the credit for the players who he brought in and were contributors to the teams success? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 No vote because the credit or blame lies with who is between the lines when the ball snaps This is PRO football, not Pop Warner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playtowinthegame Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 23 minutes ago, Jet Nut said: Who cares about 2015. Has nothing to do with it. We go from 4 wins to 10 and you're whining that we didn't make the playoffs you'll sound clueless. It's not a fluke trip to the playoffs, it's how they play. Are they improving and the talent there and developing. To get all that worked up about playoffs and make fun of anyone who's ok with the 10 wins. You're a fool for calling me clueless because I won't give credit for another 10 win season without the playoffs. The reason the 2015 season has relevance is because it was the Mac's first season as the Jets GM and just before the 2015 season Mac went on a free agency spending spree just like he recently did this off-season. The only difference is a young Sam Darnold instead of the journeyman Ryan Fitzpatrick. So unless Darnold steps up and takes a Goff like jump in his second year in the league the 2019 would/could be reminiscent to 2015 if the Jets won 10 games without making the playoffs in the first season with a new coach...even more similar with a loss to the Bill in week 17 with the playoffs on the line again and the Jets quarterback having a poor game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
playtowinthegame Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 48 minutes ago, Jet Nut said: I could care less who doesn't give either credit. You care, hence you created this thread genius. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Cowbell Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Jet Nut said: Anderson, Q, Herndon were brought in by who? Two of them are already favorites. How do you not give Macc at least a part of the credit for the players who he brought in and were contributors to the teams success? All they did was flash so far. If we get a solid year of production, Gase plays a larger role in that by putting them in a position to succeed. Herndon possibly could be a player who succeeds no matter who he plays for in the same way Gates or Gonzo were but I would say Q and Anderson need help fromnthebscheme and play calling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 13, 2019 Author Share Posted May 13, 2019 23 hours ago, playtowinthegame said: You're a fool for calling me clueless because I won't give credit for another 10 win season without the playoffs. The reason the 2015 season has relevance is because it was the Mac's first season as the Jets GM and just before the 2015 season Mac went on a free agency spending spree just like he recently did this off-season. The only difference is a young Sam Darnold instead of the journeyman Ryan Fitzpatrick. So unless Darnold steps up and takes a Goff like jump in his second year in the league the 2019 would/could be reminiscent to 2015 if the Jets won 10 games without making the playoffs in the first season with a new coach...even more similar with a loss to the Bill in week 17 with the playoffs on the line again and the Jets quarterback having a poor game. They win 10, id bet they make the playoffs. If they don't to complain would be silly.. To complain that they went from 4 wins to 10 and it wasn't enough would be ridiculous. Just as comparing a young team with a 2nd year QB to a team of vets led by Fitz is totally different situation. Darnold leads them to 10 wins I'll be happy. Being in a playoff hunt for 17 weeks, each game having playoff implications and watching the team win 10 games would be great and mean were moving forward. Im not complaining if that happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joenamathwouldn'tcry Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 20 hours ago, 14 in Green said: Wait... we started ANOTHER rebuild? It seems everyone heard about this but me.... Ah... I did not know that! Yup. New coaching staff, new players, new rebuild. Started the day after "Toilet" left town. Sorry that you and @Jetsfan80 missed the press release.,,,? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebuzzardman Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 20 hours ago, CanadaSteve said: It's called playing a team sport. You win together, you lose together. You sort of missed the joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 PoliteSent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 14, 2019 Author Share Posted May 14, 2019 On 5/12/2019 at 8:51 PM, Jetsplayer21 said: Some Mac fan boys will blame darnold if he doesn’t have a great season, without factoring in he had one of the worst time to throw protection in nfl ?♂️That would obviously be 100% macs fault Top half in the NFL for pass protection, top ten in fewest hits. Where do you get this from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 On 5/12/2019 at 10:31 AM, T0mShane said: Gase. If they do it while six or seven players go to the Pro Bowl? Then Macc gets the apology agree with this. mac will get credit if there are a bunch of pro bowlers from this group. if they just go 9-7 without much fanfare then gase gets the nod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BettyBoop Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 On 5/12/2019 at 12:13 PM, Jet_Engine1 said: 9 wins would be amazing. This team has won 14 games in 3 seasons. Possible? Sure. But in reality unlikely 8-8 would be a huge success, doubling last years win total would be big. Totally agree. It's remarkable how many "playoffs or they're fired" rants there are. I think the key is not only going 8-8, but we need to see a few of the young guys step up to fill roles/backups. For example, if Eli McGuire and Parry Nickerson get playing time and prove they will be ready to take over starting roles in two seasons, that would be a huge step forward. If Sheppard and/or Fotukasi prove they can provide depth on the DL, that would be huge. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardTodd27 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 I want to see how Q, Polite & Edoga look this year. If they look legit, Macc deserves credit and the right to keep his job (even if the Jets go 8-8) 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 14, 2019 Author Share Posted May 14, 2019 29 minutes ago, BettyBoop said: Totally agree. It's remarkable how many "playoffs or they're fired" rants there are. I think the key is not only going 8-8, but we need to see a few of the young guys step up to fill roles/backups. For example, if Eli McGuire and Parry Nickerson get playing time and prove they will be ready to take over starting roles in two seasons, that would be a huge step forward. If Sheppard and/or Fotukasi prove they can provide depth on the DL, that would be huge. Someone said that if they win 10 and dont make the playoffs should be firings, disappointment. After 4 wins, 10 isnt enough, LOL 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BettyBoop Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 57 minutes ago, RichardTodd27 said: I want to see how Q, Polite & Edoga look this year. If they look legit, Macc deserves credit and the right to keep his job (even if the Jets go 8-8) Agreed Richard. I would add to that previous years picks, such as McGuire and Nickerson. For sixth round picks, I think they performed admirably. Especially when you consider the OL and lack of receivers (when Anderson and Q were out) and a rookie QB, I think McGuire showed something. Same with Derrick Jones who may be Mac's best late round pick. I'm also not so quick to write off Sheppard and Fotukasi. They were rookies, albeit one was a 25 year old rook! Most posters say it takes three years to evaluate a draft class but want to write off second year guys immediately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsplayer21 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Jet Nut said: Top half in the NFL for pass protection, top ten in fewest hits. Where do you get this from? Did you leave out sacks for a reason ? Everywhere I look we are near bottom. Sure would like to see what your looking at. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-2018-nfl-offensive-line-rankings-all-32-teams-units-after-week-17 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 14, 2019 Author Share Posted May 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, Jetsplayer21 said: Did you leave out sacks for a reason ? Everywhere I look we are near bottom. Sure would like to see what your looking at. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-2018-nfl-offensive-line-rankings-all-32-teams-units-after-week-17 They were ranked in the top half of all OLs in the NFL. From the site you linked to. The 115 hurries was pretty good. 5th fewest hurries according to their numbers. Not the run for your life scenario some keep crying over and repeating in any and every OL conversation. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-by-pass-blocking-efficiency T-14. NEW YORK JETS 2018 pass-blocking efficiency: 85.5 Heading into 2018, the Jets’ offensive line was correctly pegged as an underwhelming unit that was made up of average-level veterans. At the end of 2018, they met expectations. They allowed 17 sacks, 19 hits, and 115 hurries from their 581 passing plays in 2018. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joenamathwouldn'tcry Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, Jetsplayer21 said: Did you leave out sacks for a reason ? Everywhere I look we are near bottom. Sure would like to see what your looking at. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-2018-nfl-offensive-line-rankings-all-32-teams-units-after-week-17 Granted the line was garbage last year, but giving up sacks was the least of their problems. Actually "protecting" the quarterback was a bright spot. They were tied for twentieth in the league in sacks allowed, not a bad statistic. Whether it was Sam's agility and ability to avoid the rush or the result of adequate protection, he wasn't "running for his life" as much as many others in the league. RK TEAM ATT COMP PCT YDS YDS/A LONG TD INT SACK YDSL RATE YDS/G 1 Houston 506 345 68.2 3781 8.2 73 26 9 62 384 102.9 236 2 Dallas 527 356 67.6 3538 7.4 90 22 8 56 347 96.7 221 3 Green Bay 640 392 61.3 4238 7.2 75 25 4 53 391 93.7 265 Jacksonville 536 329 61.4 3109 6.4 80 15 13 53 322 79.1 194 5 Oakland 556 382 68.7 3751 7.3 66 19 10 52 306 93.6 234 Miami 455 292 64.2 2900 7.3 75 26 13 52 409 93.0 181 Arizona 495 283 57.2 2523 5.8 75 15 18 52 361 69.0 158 8 Seattle 427 280 65.6 3093 8.1 66 35 7 51 355 110.9 193 9 San Francisco 532 331 62.2 3867 8.0 85 26 20 48 380 87.8 242 10 Tennessee 437 293 67.0 2975 7.4 66 16 12 47 280 89.8 186 NY Giants 583 382 65.5 4047 7.6 58 23 12 47 358 92.7 253 12 Washington 509 311 61.1 3021 6.5 79 16 15 44 266 78.1 189 13 Atlanta 617 428 69.4 4653 8.0 75 36 7 42 296 108.0 291 14 Buffalo 499 271 54.3 2794 6.2 75 13 23 41 288 62.6 175 Detroit 574 375 65.3 3576 6.7 67 22 12 41 268 88.5 224 Tampa Bay 625 408 65.3 5125 8.6 75 36 26 41 233 94.1 320 17 Minnesota 606 425 70.1 4036 7.1 75 30 10 40 262 99.7 252 Philadelphia 599 422 70.5 4275 7.6 83 29 11 40 249 100.8 267 19 Cleveland 574 353 61.5 4007 7.4 71 29 17 38 254 88.8 250 20 Cincinnati 542 331 61.1 3290 6.6 49 27 13 37 279 87.0 206 NY Jets 524 299 57.1 3165 6.5 76 18 19 37 239 73.0 198 22 Denver 588 367 62.4 3695 6.7 64 19 15 34 235 82.1 231 LA Chargers 512 348 68.0 4089 8.4 75 32 12 34 227 104.9 256 24 Chicago 512 344 67.2 3564 7.3 70 28 14 33 183 95.4 223 LA Rams 568 368 64.8 4507 8.3 70 32 12 33 223 100.7 282 26 Carolina 563 378 67.1 3836 7.2 82 28 16 32 235 92.9 240 Baltimore 556 334 60.1 3558 6.7 74 18 9 32 150 84.0 222 28 Kansas City 583 385 66.0 4955 8.8 89 50 12 26 171 113.8 310 29 Pittsburgh 689 459 66.6 5008 7.5 97 35 17 24 166 95.5 313 30 New England 574 378 65.9 4258 7.7 63 29 11 21 147 97.8 266 31 New Orleans 519 381 73.4 4042 8.0 72 33 7 20 132 112.3 253 32 Indianapolis 644 432 67.1 4461 7.1 68 39 15 18 134 98.2 279 http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/passing/sort/sacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsplayer21 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, Jet Nut said: They were ranked in the top half of all OLs in the NFL. From the site you linked to. The 115 hurries was pretty good. 5th fewest hurries according to their numbers. Not the run for your life scenario some keep crying over and repeating in any and every OL conversation. https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-offensive-lines-by-pass-blocking-efficiency T-14. NEW YORK JETS 2018 pass-blocking efficiency: 85.5 Heading into 2018, the Jets’ offensive line was correctly pegged as an underwhelming unit that was made up of average-level veterans. At the end of 2018, they met expectations. They allowed 17 sacks, 19 hits, and 115 hurries from their 581 passing plays in 2018. lol ok. I don’t see why some fans accept a average at best OL, with not much youth at all. Darnold’s agility and ability to escape the pocket is a major reason why the O didn’t look that bad. If we had a statue like Eli, it may have been Ranked the worse. Point is, I think darnold will be a better qb not always being pushed out of the pocket.. Just providing the bare minimum for him is not the best idea to build a franchise qb 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 14, 2019 Author Share Posted May 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, Jetsplayer21 said: lol ok. I don’t see why some fans accept a average at best OL, with not much youth at all. Darnold’s agility and ability to escape the pocket is a major reason why the O didn’t look that bad. If we had a statue like Eli, it may have been Ranked the worse. Point is, I think darnold will be a better qb not always being pushed out of the pocket.. Just providing the bare minimum for him is not the best idea to build a franchise qb New point, new direction. No one said they were happy or accepting of average. Actually from your site theyre better than average. Theyre not particularly old. The point was he wasn't running for his life. Keep hearing how he was and he wasnt. 115 hurries left him around 4th or 5th least hurried QB. Not hit, hurried. Agility isnt in the equation. Plus McCown played 4 games. I get it, we all do, no pressure is the goal, 115 hurries isnt a fire drill though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesr Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Need an option for "whoever the new GM is"! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.